|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:23 PM Original message |
Anyone notice the D.C. Madame case dropped right out of the MSM... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. John Stossel took care of that very neatly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. maybe because of the gag order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. That list will never see the light of day. At least, not an uncensored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yeah, just like the Gannon thingy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Rumors on the internets: Cheney PLUS DC JOURNALISTS on Madam's list! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The gall of CorpMedia... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Journalists are competitive by nature, must be some heavy pressure to stifle this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Who pays these journalists salaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ToeBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, sexual indiscretions are an impeachable offense, nevermind the high crimes and misdemeanors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. yep, around the time that rumors about Cheney began circulating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-31-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Wouldn't it be nice if all we were dealing with was a BJ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC