I saw this last night.
It was titled then as it is now on the NBC News video site as "Reality Check: Is Iran aiding terrorists?
Now the title (on the Lexis transcript page) is "Proof of Connection between Iraq and Iran"
Before you see that Andrea Mitchell report--- that the Bush claims are just that with no hard evidence to support them I found this
From John "What is the purpose?" Gibson
WHY IS NBC NO LONGER WORRIED ABOUT TERRORISM?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,244319,00.htmlGibson complains that NBC (supplanting ABC's Brian Ross as enemy of the state #1) doesn't have a show just like "24" and that someone at NBC dared question if the show's (conservative) producers were using it for propaganda.
Okay here is the NBC report.
http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100007221&docId=l:565475150&start=8As the civil war in Iraq grows deadlier by the day, the Bush administration is increasingly blaming Iran. What does the US claim? First the ambush in Karbala killing five US troops 11 days ago. US and Iraqi military officials say Iran may have provided money and training for the attack. But what is the evidence? Iraqis say the ambush was so well planned, Iran had to be involved. But tonight a senior US intelligence official tells NBC News "you can't prove it at this point."
Mr. BRUCE RIEDEL (Former Central Intelligence Agency Official): The argument that just because it was sophisticated it couldn't be Iraqis is a little bit tenuous. The Iraqi insurgency has shown a great deal of sophistication over the last four years.
MITCHELL: Another US claim that Iran is providing weapons to Iraqi insurgents and militias, shoulder fired rockets and shaped charges like this one, explosive devices known as EFPs.
General MICHAEL HAYDEN (Central Intelligence Agency Director): (From file footage) The EFPs are coming from Iran. They are--they are being used against our forces.
MITCHELL: What is the evidence? US officials say they found proof on computers seized three weeks ago from an Iranian office in Irbil, but tonight a senior US official tells NBC News, "Even if the weapons are made in Iran, it doesn't mean Iran provided them directly."
Third, what about the US claim that Iran's Revolutionary Guard is helping to target US and Iraqi forces in Iraq. Intelligence analysts say after Saddam fell, Iranian agents did pour into Iraq. But experts say 90 percent of the attack on US forces are from Sunni insurgents or al-Qaeda, not Iran.
So why would the administration want to blame Iran?
Mr. ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI (Former National Security Advisor): A lot of the stories we hear are, in fact, prefaced by the word "allegedly." In some ways it's reminiscent of the hype that was being developed before the war with Iraq.
MITCHELL: Critics say blaming Iran could in part be a useful diversion to deflect criticism from US and Iraqi failures in the war. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, New York.
WILLIAMS: When NIGHTLY NEWS continues in just a moment, the latest airline security tactics. How about giving--getting everybody at the airport to now be on the lookout?