Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A FEW KEY 'YES' VOTES"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:10 PM
Original message
"A FEW KEY 'YES' VOTES"
.... When Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) announced this morning that he will support the health care reform bill, it gave reform proponents a helpful boost. But, while Kucinich is the first "no" vote to switch, there were a few other key "yes" vote announcements today.

"Representative Dale Kildee, Democrat of Michigan and a strong opponent of abortion, announced on Wednesday that he was satisfied with the provisions in the Senate-passed health care bill that seek to limit the use of federal money for insurance coverage of abortion.

The announcement by Mr. Kildee that he would support the health care legislation and would not oppose it based on the abortion issue gave a huge lift to House Democratic leaders, who have been working to assure abortion opponents that a vote for the bill would not reflect any change in policy on abortion, including the law known as the Hyde amendment, which prohibits the use of federal money for abortion in most cases."


In a statement, Kildee emphasized the fact that he "spent six years studying to be a priest and was willing to devote my life to God." He added, "I am convinced that the Senate language maintains the Hyde amendment, which states that no federal money can be used for abortion.... We must not lose sight of what is at stake here -- the lives of 31 million American children, adults, and seniors who don't have health insurance. There is nothing more pro-life than protecting the lives of 31 million Americans."

Kildee has been a close ally of Rep. Bart Stupak, suggesting the Michigan Democrat is struggling to keep his bloc together. (For the record, Stupak never identified exactly which members were/are part of his alleged dozen.)

Kildee's announcement came on the heels of a statement from Rep. James Oberstar (D-Minn.), another pro-life Dem believed to be an ally of Stupak's. Oberstar, who said he only supported the reform bill in November because of the Stupak language, said today that he will back the final reform legislation. "I wanted to see the language, understand it better, have conversations with Sen. Nelson," Oberstar said this morning. "On balance, it does what we need to do."

Now, with Kildee and Oberstar, the reform bill is keeping "yes" votes, rather than gaining "no" votes. But this is every bit as necessary in getting to 216."


—Steve Benen 4:25 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (14)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

I know this has been reported but it doesn't hurt to keep it front and center as a reminder of what's being acknowledged by those who previously thought they couldn't vote for the Bill bc of stupak's persuasion.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep the news flowing - thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You're right..in fact I used
your word "flowing" just now in a GD repost of this piece by Steve Benen.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'll have to venture over that way
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 08:10 PM by goclark
and see how the water is today.

I wish I could be a fly on the wall in some of their discussion sessions.

Bet the #### words are flowing today.

When will the vote be -- I am on pins and nedles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stupak is an idiot.
He has been told -- and he has been shown -- that the language in the bill does not allow for federal funding of abortions.

There is no there there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, it's important to show that although
stupak has shown a good voting record in other progressive areas..this is one issue that's way over his head..willfully or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Every time I get an email to do so
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 07:30 PM by get the red out
I call my weak-kneed blue dog's office and super-politely and with a tone of intelligence request that he support the bill. I am trying to be more impressive than the droves of Earl Pitts sounding turds that are turning down Rush and putting out their cigarettes to dial him up on their cell in the Rally's drive through.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You brought that image to life
very vividly, get the red out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That image is my world
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC