Hardball Discussion on NH Exit Polling

[FourScore]

Run time: 07:24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jo4pwCG23c   Posted on YouTube: January 10, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: January 10, 2008 By DU Member: FourScore Views on DU: 505

 
MATTHEWS: So what accounts for Hillary Clinton's victory in New Hampshire? What we don't know is why the victory is so much different in fact, then the polling ahead of time, including what we call the Exit Polls were telling us. Obama was ahead in those polls by an average of 8 points, and even our own Exit Polls, taken as people came out of voting, showed him ahead. So what's going on here

[Sanity Claws]

1. Why didn't he ask these questions in 2004

when Bush won even though exit polls said Kerry won?

[Bitwit1234]

2. We, with intelligence, know what happened.

The pollesters didn't ask the right people...they looked at Obama and his supporters jumping up and down and said he would win.

The people of this country are so damn mad that the corporate republican MSM is trying to tell us what to do, and who we should vote for, the people said FU** the MSM we're gonna vote for who WE WANT TO ---NOT WHO THE TELL US TO.

[Diane R]

3. How dense can these people be? Have they noticed that Obama won the hand counted precincts?

[ProfessorPlum]

4. this is so f*ing idiotic

Matthews does know that the difference between Clinton and Obama in NH was only 3%, right? And that a swing of only 1.5% of the voters would have thrown it to Obama, right? And that WAY many more than that of the voters were undecided leading up to Tuesday, right? And that Clinton was in the lead for almost a year in NH? And that Clinton still maintains a very big national lead?

What is so unknowable about the front-runner winning a contest? Just because there was a blip in the polling doesn't mean squat. What a shill this guy is.

And Hillary isn't my candidate.