Attention Democrats: Who'll Stand Up for Working Americans?

[Nick_Irving]

Run time: 01:19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB8Ch9mNZ74   Posted on YouTube: January 04, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: January 05, 2008 By DU Member: Nick_Irving Views on DU: 966

 
PROTECT AMERICAN JOBS.

[Bitwit1234]

1. It won't be Obama and I can't believe Kucnich would support him.

Obama is anti-union and anti-labor. He is anti-seniors. And I hope to hell those organizations cream his ass so fast he will learn the lesson that these are what help build the middle class that bush and his minions tore down.

[FREEWILL56]

3. Kucinich is not supporting Obama as what you saw was a

political strategy for 1 state only if DK was not going to get enough of a percentage. DK is still very much running for president so get that notion out of your head and quite assuming. He has NOT conceded or dropped out.

[antigop]

2. It won't be Hillary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhLBSLLIhUs
Hillary pushes for more h1-b visas and outsourcing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLNOSGM2jK4
Lou Dobbs: Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy (part 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgdrh2Bc95M
Lou Dobbs: Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy (part 2)

[ChiciB1]

4. But D.C. Elites & Big Corporations Want Her... They CONTROL America!

And despite Obama's win in Iowa & Kucinich's support for him (which I find preposterous) Obama will CONTINUE to do well because he's right in there with them!

Sorry, but facts speak for themselves... he has received lots of money from the same people Clinton has, and YET he talks about taking on CORPORATE GREED! For me, this sounds like hypocrisy by Obama!

We don't need "glitz" for a president, just as we DIDN'T need a man "you could have a beer with!" QueSera, QueSera (sp)!

[antigop]

5. I share your concerns. n/t

[frog92969]

6. ditto

[bobbolink]

7. I was disappointed 4 years ago to find this in Obama!

I wanted him to be what the Dems had been waiting for.

Instead, he was more of the same.

More kissy-face with the BIG lobbyists.

Nope, don't need more of that.

I couldn't vote for him, or for sHIllary.

[ChiciB1]

8. I Said That Some Time Ago... Since MSM Is Telling Us ALL THE TIME

that a Democrat will win the WH, my vote won't be needed. If possible, I'll write in John Edwards, if not I'll skip down and not vote!

Sorry, folks.... gotta vote my conscience as so many of the Kucinich voters here say they will!!

I'm SICK of Clinton/Obama.... Clinton/Obama.... Clinton/Obama! Almost EVERY single debate, on most of the blogs, John Edwards comes out the winner, and YET MSM pans him! I KNOW why, but it SUCKS!

[antigop]

10. I hear ya, ChiciB1, I hear ya. n/t

[bobbolink]

11. Yeah, we can KNOW why, but that doesn't make it any easier to take.

I'm currently discouraged, after attending a "progressive" event, to find MOST backing Obama.

Edwards was seen as "too negative".

:mad:

I mean, it's only that our country is dying, right? Nothing to be angry about, right?

:wtf:

I seemed to reach one person.... he didn't say much, but was obviously mulling things over. I finally asked him what he was thinking, and he said, "I'm realizing that maybe I haven't been making my decision as well as I could. I've only been considering international issues, and not domestic."

I hope he thinks it over, but... that's just one person.

Image.

The population want IMAGE, when the ship of state is going down.

:nuke:

[DutchLiberal]

9. These 'Attention Democrats' videos really say it all.

Nothing more needs to be added. Why not air these videos on national television?