by a report that claims only SIXTY-FIVE people have died as the result of Chernobyl. What a deadly load of bollocks! Lynas is also pro-GMO foods.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8108090/What-the-Green-Movement-Got-Wrong-A-turncoat-explains.htmlto quote Lynas----- "the effects of the radioactive contamination on people are much less serious than previously thought. That is what the science says, yet many green groups continue to spread myths about tens of thousands of people dying because of Chernobyl when the actual death toll so far – according to a major UN report published in 2006 – has likely been only around 65."
I am a member of Miljöpartiet de Gröna (The Swedish Green Party), and I can assure you, that we are thriving (we had the biggest gains of any political party in the latest Swedish elections in the fall of 2010, PRE-FUKUSHIMA), and I am proud to say, we remain staunchly anti-nuclear power.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A more accurate figure for Chernobyl would be at least 250,000, possibly up to 1 million deaths over the last 20 to 25 years. (main naysayers of this are the pro-nukers)
The study (From The New York Academy of Sciences) that shows 1 millon deaths:http://www.nyas.org/publications/annals/Detail.aspx?cid=f3f3bd16-51ba-4d7b-a086-753f44b3bfc1 This is a collection of papers translated from the Russian with some revised and updated contributions. Written by leading authorities from Eastern Europe, the volume outlines the history of the health and environmental consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. According to the authors, official discussions from the International Atomic Energy Agency and associated United Nations' agencies (e.g. the Chernobyl Forum reports) have largely downplayed or ignored many of the findings reported in the Eastern European scientific literature and consequently have erred by not including these assessments.
Posted 4/28/2010
NEW YORK—“Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment,” Volume 1181 of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, published online in November 2009, was authored by Alexey V. Yablokov, of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Alexey V. Nesterenko, of the Institute of Radiation Safety (Belarus), and the late Prof. Vassily B. Nesterenko, former director of the Belarussian Nuclear Center. With a foreword by the Chairman of the Ukranian National Commission on Radiation Protection, Dimitro M. Grodzinsky, the 327-page volume is an English translation of a 2007 publication by the same authors. The earlier volume, “Chernobyl,” published in Russian, presented an analysis of the scientific literature, including more than 1,000 titles and more than 5,000 printed and Internet publications mainly in Slavic languages, on the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A review
Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment was published by the New York Academy of Sciences. It is authored by three noted scientists: Russian biologist Dr. Alexey Yablokov, former environmental advisor to the Russian president; Dr. Alexey Nesterenko, a biologist and ecologist in Belarus; and Dr.Vassili Nesterenko, a physicist and at the time of the accident director of the Institute of Nuclear Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Its editor is Dr. Janette Sherman, a physician and toxicologist long-involved in studying the health impacts of radioactivity.
The book is solidly based on health data, radiological surveys and scientific reports — some 5,000 in all.
It concludes that based on records now available, some 985,000 people died, mainly of cancer, as a result of the Chernobyl accident. That is between when the accident occurred in 1986 and 2004. More deaths, it projects, will follow.
snip
Further worsening the situation, she said, has been “the collusive agreement between the IAEA and the World Health Organization in which the WHO is precluded from publishing any research on radiation effects without consultation with the IAEA.” WHO, the public health arm of the UN, has supported the IAEA’s claim that 4,000 will die as a result of the accident.
“How fortunate,” said Ms. Slater, “that independent scientists have now revealed the horrific costs of the Chernobyl accident.”
The book also scores the position of the IAEA, set up through the UN in 1957 “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy,” and its 1959 agreement with WHO. There is a “need to change,” it says, the IAEA-WHO pact. It has muzzled the WHO, providing for the “hiding” from the “public of any information”unwanted” by the nuclear industry.
snip
http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=3146http://www.independentaustralia.net/2011/health/chernobyl-cover-up-study-shows-more-than-a-million-deaths-from-radiation/http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2010/2010-04-26-01.html http://www.alternet.org/environment/146619/book//'s_astounding_allegation%3A_chernobyl_radiation_killed_nearly_one_million_people-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenpeace , in 2006, came out with study showing at least 250,000 cancer cases from Chernobyl as of 2004http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/chernobyl-deaths-180406-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chernobyl also caused a dramatic increase in cancer here in Sweden, especially Norrbotten (the northermost part, where my partner's family is from)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4028729.stm The study :
http://www.liu.se/en/news-and-events/news/1.10658?l=en Increase In Cancer In Sweden Can Be Traced To Chernobyl
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070530080956.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chernobyl in heartbreaking picture essay
http://inmotion.magnumphotos.com/essay/chernobyl
-----------------------------------
65 deaths my arse, and anyone who agrees with this IS a quack or a shill, probably both.