|
Edited on Mon Aug-15-11 11:34 PM by sabrina 1
The same thing that has started so many down through the decades. The police beating and/or killing members of the community and a long history of abuse by the police against the people in poor communities.
15 cops beating up a 16 girl at what was a peaceful demonstration asking for information on the killing of the man, a member of the community, by the police, sparked the initial violence.
In Tunisia, it was a similar incident, not the first by any means, but the straw that broke the camel's back that sparked their revolution also, and for many in Egypt similar incidents of police brutality against the population, were the sparks that finally lit the fires of their revolution.
And as you can see in Syria, the more violent their police become, the more the demonstrations grow.
The same thing is happening in Iraq although we hear little about it here. And in Bahrain, in Yemen and anywhere where the police brutalize the population and the top members of society are corrupt.
It happened in the US, in NY, in LA and in countless other places. But the thread that connects all of them is the relationship between law enforcement and the community. For some it takes a lot longer for the anger to erupt into riots. But sooner or later it happens.
Add to that, and the similarities continue, the Wealthy in Tunisia, in Egypt, in Britain, in the US and in Yemen and elsewhere, finally exposed as corrupt, in Tunisia by Wikileaks eg, and you add the beating to death of a citizen by the police, and the corruption of the government, and riots often begin.
Now that Europe is being forced into third world status, with the obscenely wealthy stealing everything they can while taking more and more from the poor, this is likely to keep happening.
Injustice and corruption at the highest levels and police brutality are a lethal combination that will always end in civil unrest.
Why don't we see riots in wealthy, upscale neighborhoods? Why are the wealthy not angry?
|