|
to the political, larger economic sphere especially if the person wanting to apply it wants to win wars or build skyscrapers.
We demand huge sacrifices of the men and women who serve in our military -- huge, huge, ultimate sacrifices.
We don't pay most of them very well. We ask them to sacrifice for the good of their country, for their fellow citizens, for their families, their loved ones.
There isn't really much in it for the people who serve.
In WWII, the whole country sacrificed and worked together. Since the Rand phenomenon became the rage in the 1960s, the country has disintegrated into raging, self-interested six foot infants. And our inability to actually prevail in any military endeavor reflects that.
The guys who went in and got Bin Laden just feet from a Pakistani military installation are an exception to this rule. They sacrificed for something -- maybe each other -- maybe for their country and their sweethearts and kids -- but they sure didn't do that for their own selfish interests. Too much risk. It would not make sense.
Those who see themselves as destined to be the architects may delude themselves into thinking that Ayn Rand's philosophy is working for them. But they are wrong. An architect cannot build his creation without the riveter (or the carpenter).
And that little guy, the riveter, the carpenter, is working to put food on his family's table, to help those he cares about. It's the sacrifices of people who are working for an ideal -- family, society, others, that make the architect's dream a reality. The guy at the top thinks he is a hero living only for himself, but he can achieve nothing unless others work for their ideals.
And so, ultimately, sacrifice, idealism, even cooperation win out over objectivism.
Ayn Rand's philosophy is a scourge on our country. No wonder we are in so much trouble.
|