John Kerry Was Right About EVERYTHING!

[Pryderi]

Run time: 08:36 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U-VXKlA4Fk   Posted on YouTube: May 04, 2011 By YouTube Member: MoxNewsDotCom Views on YouTube: 581   Posted on DU: May 04, 2011 By DU Member: Pryderi Views on DU: 5550

 
Can you imagine what our country would've been like if Bush lost in '04?

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

1. Not blm?

My bad.

[MessiahRp]

15. Maybe not but blm should revel in these pronouncements

as all of us who worked our asses off and truly admire Kerry (I count myself as one of these) should. The man was dead right. Imagine how much better off we'd be right now if Ohio wasn't stolen in 2004.

Rp

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

36. "Revel" "Admire" "Imagine"

You're certainly on-board.

[lutherj]

35. BLM? Bureau of Land Management?

[Blue Owl]

2. He was also the elected president in 2004

Because Bu$h and the GOP steal every election they possibly can.

[Democrafty]

3. We know.

But thanks, Mr. O'Donnell :)

[YvonneCa]

18. ...

...:7 :hi:

[aquart]

4. Yes.

Unfortunately that is rarely good enough for Americans.

[RaleighNCDUer]

5. kick

to watch later

[knixphan]

6. Superkick!

[BigD_95]

7. I love his show.

I think he has the best show on MSNBC now.

[Pryderi]

11. It's a toss up for me, between

him and Rachel.

[bulloney]

8. Regarding the replay of one of Bush's remarks:

Bush commented that bin Laden had at one time run a country. What country was that? Was he referring to Afghanistan? Was he getting the Taliban and al Quaeda mixed up, or does he think they're one in the same?

It's been my understanding that bin Laden was the leader of a terrorist group, al Quaeda. He was never a leader of a nation, either officially or by proxy.

[Enthusiast]

22. Of course you know that Bush isn't too bright.

And he is poorly informed on most every issue.

[beachmom]

28. Actually, Bush was correct there. OBL was supplying the Taliban with funds.

He was a "client" of the Afghanistan government. He was highly influential in Afghanistan at the time. But the Taliban are more complex than that today, especially given that there is an Afghan and a Pakistani Taliban, two completely different organizations.

[thereismore]

9. This was so good! nt

[Sparkly]

10. Excellent.

:kick:

[ejbr]

12. Bush did lose in '04

funny machines, 8 hour lines in Democratic districts and the purging of voter roles gave him "victory"

[INdemo]

17. Hell yes he lost..just as he lost in 2000

Bush was a puppet for the corporations.He was their path toward illegal banking practices and Wall St fraud.And now the damn Republicans are/were able to shift the economic failures of the Bush puppet years to the Democrats and they succeeded.
...Yes Kerry won ..But for us Kerry supporters we were labeled a bunch of whiners even among Democrats..So how did they get away with it?

[YvonneCa]

19. EXCELLENT...

...question. How did they?

[Enthusiast]

23. Kasich plans to do the same in 2012.

And he will get away with it.

[zbdent]

26. and, if I recall correctly, a weather anamoly in a RED voting station in Ohio

which, for some odd reason, absolutely no other area near that station had any idea occurred ...

it closed the station, keeping it from reporting results for several hours ...

[Marblehead]

13. Bush,Cheney

screwed us so bad we will never recover from it. They did everything OBL wanted.

[garthranzz]

14. 2 points

Ever notice how Bush smirks when he's lying? Every time.

Why can't the Democrats learn to counter the weak and obvious tactics used in that ad? rhetoric 101, people.

[spicegal]

16. We mustn't allow Americans to forget WHO was serious

about going after terrorist and who was NOT. Clinton understood the threat and warned the Bush administration, who in turn made it a low priority and ignored the warnings. Then along came 9/11. Bush then invaded a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 while allowing the mastermind to escape. Democrats needs to pledge from this day forward to dispel the myth that Republicans are more capable on matters of national security. It just aint so.

[YvonneCa]

20. And that IS the question. Why...

...did they USE 9/11 to invade Iraq? Are we finally going to ask THAT question?

[Enthusiast]

24. While I agree with your assessment

, your version of reality is not allowed to be heard. Maybe Rachel Maddow and Ed will say it but they are the only ones.

The rest of the media continues to paint Bush as a sort of hero for doing nothing good that I can see. Hell, even Rudy Giuliani was held up as some sort of hero leading up to the primary season. All they did was stick their face in front of a camera after 9/11 -instant hero.

[valerief]

21. But the American people always get everything they want. The top 1% American people, that is. nt

[Enthusiast]

25. Bush is so fucking stupid.

His followers are also stupid so it just doesn't matter.

[beachmom]

27. Wow. Awesome. nt

[felix_numinous]

29. John Kerry wasn't elected

because he didn't want to use 911 to empower the MIC corporate empire domestically and overseas. I am convinced anyone who wishes to be elected in this country has to get a pass from them.

K&R- I agree this election was stolen also!

[rosesaylavee]

30. that certainly was cathartic.

thanks for posting

[maddiemom]

31. Bush/Kerry

How great to read, again, the common sense from the Kerry choir. I agree with and have supported John Kerry for years. This doesn't begin to negate the teaming hoards of Fox infused know-nothings who will parrot negative talking points about scary left wing "socialists" (should we ever be so fortunate as to have a real one) until their last breath. In my own every-day life, the numbers of these idiots seem to be dwindling, so maybe there's hope.

[NewJeffCT]

32. The worst things about Bush's second term

Imagine if these two far right justices were replaced with reliable Democrats/left of center votes? Heck, even moderates would have been a huge improvement.

[DFW]

34. Even moderate conservatives would have been an improvement

Roberts and Alito have proven themselves as far right crusading activists, concerned about preserving NOTHING
good in our country. They would do away with the rights of the individual (what is conservative about THAT?)
and preserve only the rights of corporations and control freaks posing as religious "leaders." What is
conservative about that? Radical rightists they are. Conservatives? Roberts and Alito are conservative
like Cheney and Bush were "compassionate."

Roberts and Alito are conservative like Tomás de Torquemada was conservative, and if they had their way,
would have our country follow de Torquemada's example: power concentrated in the hands of a few control
freaks and the money that finances their power buys all privileges. Peasants need not apply--just obey.

[Pryderi]

37. You just made me physically ill. :( n/t

[blackbart99]

33. Nice to hear thre retro-defense of John Kery...

The President is getting swiftboated right now(actually for the last 3 years).

Well done sir....:yourock: :headbang: Mr. O'Donnell.

[politicasista]

38. Kick. Apologies

for the mean stuff I wrote about Senator Kerry a day ago. He is good and Obama sounds like he is listening to the right people.

:kick: :patriot: