Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They picked another idiot to be Miss America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:04 AM
Original message
They picked another idiot to be Miss America
 
Run time: 00:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYa-FiSMJBw
 
Posted on YouTube: January 16, 2011
By YouTube Member: bigbutpretty
Views on YouTube: 33
 
Posted on DU: January 16, 2011
By DU Member: Joanne98
Views on DU: 4363
 

Why do we have to suffer the humilation of ALWAYS have idiots for beauty queens?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. So when will her sex tapes be released?
Or has "the Donald" gotten hold of all the copies already? }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curiousdemo Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. I wonder if she kin to Miss Teen South Carolina?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. "The Donald" owns the Miss Universe pageant, not the Miss America one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't it a pre-requisite? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't that just automatic, given the pool of choices?
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 07:18 AM by Rabrrrrrr
:shrug:

These are women who have devoted most of their free time to wearing swimsuits and parading in front of large groups of people in the hopes of winning the idiotic "biggest pageant winner!!!!" award.

And yes, she's an idiot- that answer she gave was no answer; totally incoherent, and it means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. that has to be one of the most sexist things I've ever read on here
go back and do a bit of research on these young women

Miss New York's platform is gay rights

Miss Delaware's platform is increasing public awareness of alopecia areata-I'm sure you can look it up

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. But notice that the strongest contenders for this pageant
don't come from the mid-Atlantic or New England states...The 'real' contenders come from the mid-west and southwest..and even northwest (Gretchen Carlson who is from Minnesota)...States like Oklahoma do very well in these competitions...Oklahoma has numerous Miss America wins and runners up.

The more ignorant the better they do.

Someone should study regionalism in the US and how it impacts on the culture of gender and competitions such as this. Don't really want to point the finger at the southwest; however, I grew up there..I've seen how this kind of sexism thrives in that part of the world...The southeastern US is similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Well, thanks for that David...I agree that the automatic "she's dumb" response IS sexist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. How can it be sexist? Only women are in the contest. I'm sorry I used "she" and "women".
Next time I'll use "it" and "them".

:eyes:

Just because I say pageant participants are stupid, and it just happens that they're all women, is in absolutely no way saying "women are stupid" or "they're stupid because they're women".

Get real.

And a person's platform has absolutely no correlation to their intelligence or intellectual comprehension of the world. To offer a few platforms up as proof that no pageant contestants are stupid is pure silliness. That kind of logic would never pass muster in a scientific journal. (caveat: I also know that my broadbrush indictment of all pageant participants also wouldn't pass muster, but mine was the crime of laziness in not being more specific, not an outright failure to think)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wait! What ?
Are they actually asking about wikileaks during this, er, thing? WTF?

Yah - she's never read her Benjamin Franklin. On the other hand we can't say definitively that she's stupid. What she said was obviously popular with this society crowd of rich white folks, so perhaps she is cLculating what to say I'm order to win. Of course that would indicate that she is either an authoritarian Nazi type or just lacking any ethical center.

But stupid, not necessarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. When you think about it, isn't she just a better looking Glen Beck?
That's what a lot of these pageant "judges" are probably looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Blech - I just threw up a bit in my mouth.
Beauty may be skin deep, but ugly goes to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. At least she was looking for a map,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. yeah, fuck everyone OUTSIDE our borders
not to mention that it's a joke that we're so safe inside our borders, with all the guns etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gadjitfreek Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, at least now she's...
...qualified to run for Vice President! Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. You know when I have questions about wikileaks I turn to miss america for answers
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Looks like Assange has MIC spooked like it's never been spooked before.
Not just Ms. Nebraska's canned, yet jumbled discourse but also the set-up question served up by the dude in the green beret togs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. she`s 17 but here`s another 17yr old that has italy all abuzz


that`s the pm`s new squeeze...age of consent is 14 in italy but prostitution is`t until 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. That was NOT a stupid reply. Watch again.
That was canned, rehearsed propaganda.
Both the questioner and the bimbo were rehearsed.
Listen to the tone of the guy asking the question and the tone of the blond. Note the cadence and the rhythm.
Notice her sound bite.

You are looking a future Fox newsbroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rtassi Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. It was a stupid and ignorant reply .. well rehearsed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. What I don't understand about the wikileaks thing
Those on the Right are paranoid about government. They're always accusing us of having too much faith in government, and they shake in their boots over their conspiracy theories. So a website comes along and exposes the very corruption they want to clean up, and they want to crucify the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Well, that sounds like a paradox on the surface, for sure, but here's my..
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 12:11 PM by forty6
theory on it.

The righties are more afraid of the expose's of the banks and secret Swiss bank accounts the rich have that might be exposed.

They also know, deep down, the truth, namely that their government has been lying to them and pulling all sorts of tricks and deals in foreign relations ever since the Eisenhower years, but more since Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II...and it makes the good ole USA "look bad".

Also, they really don't want the "IMAGE" of the USA hurt, even tho they hate too much government, which they really don't hate, they like the government services, it's federal taxes they hate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. The leaks don't say what they want, and this sort of exposee is a "liberal" thing...
The Pentagon papers and the intelligence investigations of the 70's are part of the RW narrative that liberals inherently undermine national security and "blame America first" for anything.

Add to that the fact that the Wikileaks revelations don't say what the RWes want them to say (i.e., something like "Iran is three weeks away from a functional nuclear weapon", or memos with George Soros' marching orders to MoveOn and ACORN, Nigerian/Indonesian records on their "Hawaii project", and other assorted wingnut fantasy material); what they do say are things that work against their worldview, things that they spent time showting down liberal critics about but turned out to be true.

They're up in arms about it because it diesn't prove they were right. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
furgee Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Who really watches this shit anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rtassi Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Yipes! the government won't have to take whats left of
our liberties away ... because we are going to hand them over with out a fight ... in fact we will probably demand that they do it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. In What Respect Charlie?
Actually she did a better job than Palin or Bachmann.

If you're going to lie about what you don't know, make it a big lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Actually I take exception to that.
I consider the Miss America thing very degrading and humiliating to women. But I suspect that your motivation for this is the former Miss South Carolina who actually wasn't picked to be Miss America. In the interview which she is famous for she was a deer in the headlights but she isn't an idiot. We are guilty of the same kind of prejudice that the right practices regularly if we assume that she is an idiot. She was a contestant on television show "The Amazing Race" and she showed very clearly that she was not the ditsy person we all assumed she was in her famous question response video.

Sometimes reasonable people get caught in unusual and uncomfortable situations. Are we to always make fun of that? I wish all of the contestants well and I appreciate that these young women are much more than the bathing suit meat that they are paraded around as. Our culture has forced them into a role that is unfortunate but I am not one to make fun of the victimized contestants themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Miss SC wan't in the Miss Americ pageant. She was a Miss Teen America contestant, I believe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's less painful for the rest of us when stupid people are really
good looking. It gives us something fun to think about while pretending to listen to them. When you listen to a stupid person speak, who also is unattractive, then your mind wanders to the honey-do list, problems at work, the upcoming month-long visit by the in-laws - you know, depressing stuff.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. I may have disagreed to some extent but she was cool under pressure for a 17 yr old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Damning with faint praise, I guess.
What "pressure"? She wanted to do this, she loves being looked at, and she answered with nonsense. What's "cool" about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wow.
And you all know, security
Is mortals' chiefest enemy.
– W. Shakespeare, Macbeth (ca. 1606), Act II, scene v, MIT's Moby Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's not the beauty queens' fault.
It's the fault of the people who need beauty queens.

These chicks are just living "up" to their standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. You can't top this one.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. I notice that she uses her mouth the same way Sarah Palin does. I am beginning to think
that jutting jaw-forward lip pressing movement must be in response to the thick, greasy heaviness of the lip gloss or lipstick these women wear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I imagine having one's teeth coated in vaseline makes one's mouth move in weird, uncomfortable ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Oh Sarah, Sarah, ..shakes head.....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. screw you guys! Nebraska RULES
GO BIG RED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raoul Donating Member (666 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. an absolute
f-ing moron again! Oh dear. Is that sexist? Well if this were a Mr. America contest and the dude responded with the same garbage, my response would be identical. Okay? Does that satisfy the sensitive politically correct morons? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Brilliant! She'd make an excellent GOP candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swishyfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
44. Bunch of A-holes here
Seriously? She's 17!
I'm sure all the haters here were fully capable of answering a blind question in front of thousands in the audience and millions at home when you were in High School.

I get it that she doesn't share our views on Wikileaks, but she's 17, cute, and provided an answer no worse than the ENTIRE establishment press.

It's like a bunch of YouTube commenters invaded here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
45. If you're going to call someone an "idiot" and maintain credibility, it's best
to employ correct grammar structure and spelling. The sentence "Why do we have to suffer the humilation of ALWAYS have idiots for beauty queens?" features two such mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. The infiltration to subliminally push their agenda is deep.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC