Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IRAQ HEARINGS: Sen. Clinton Questions Gen. Petraeus...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 05:22 PM
Original message
IRAQ HEARINGS: Sen. Clinton Questions Gen. Petraeus...
 
Run time: 09:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41hvHYKmjQ8
 
Posted on YouTube: September 12, 2007
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: September 14, 2007
By DU Member: bridgit
Views on DU: 1474
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. of course no one will give her credit
for taking patraeus to task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I will. She was good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralphmich3 Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. The problems with Hillary
Hillary Clinton whole-heartedly and vehemently supporting George Bush's stupid war in Iraq in 2003. and explaining her support of the war at length:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYATbsu2cP8


Giuliani ad on HIllary's support of Bush's stupid war in Iraq:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L63Ff_mGzs


Hillary's campaign financing - the PAC's money (haven't gotten around to Hsu yet):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSfabjRW1eg


Hillary's history of scandal which the rightwing will use:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0P0rOLCALo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. She ought to be tough....
She has a lot to do to make up for supporting this horrible war from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R! Well done, Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the Senator Clinton we should expect to see -- great job!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. WTF!?! Did we see the same video?
I have been severely disappointed with the performance of our Democratic representatives on the committee. They blather on in pointless monologues, using up the handful minutes they have allocated for questions, and then ask stupid questions. All I saw was that repeated here. Clinton spent almost all of her time reciting facts EVERYBODY ALREADY KNOWS, and has already been repeated by other members of the committee! She then asks a "Gotcha!" question of Petreus, which doesn't give us any insight into plans, strategy, or anything even having to do with other than Petreus said things which might be vaguely contradictory. Then a pointless question to the Ambassador: "Should we act diplomatically with the Iraqi neighbors?" Well, duh. How do you think the guy would respond?

At least she took the time to ask two lame questions. That embarrassing fool Boxer used up all her time without asking one damn question!

Just terrible performances. Its sad when Republican hacks like Hagel ask more direct and enlightening questions than our own people. Just terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. She was fooled into by war by *.
And admits to it! We can't expect her to come up with pointed questions NOW after she lead us into this mess with her support for the occupation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wasn't the Congress mislead...not given the real intelligence reports?
The vote was to allow Bu$h Co. authorization to pursue all diplomatic efforts first, wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. dont let facts stand in the way of fanaticism
its a buzz kill man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I stated a fact that you two don't like...
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 06:34 PM by iaviate1
And in reality, you're the fanatic with your support for somebody who was fooled by Bush into war. I'm familiar with the tactics of attacking the messenger instead of the issue... the Bush administration does it well. I shouldn't have to expect it on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. And she trusted * to do that?
Another stupid mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralphmich3 Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hillary's support of the Iraq War - 23 voted Nay
23 Senators voted against the authorization of force in 2002 - Hillary did not. Hillary continued to support the war in Iraq up until the November 2006 election. After that election, her position, conveniently, began to change. By this time Rumsfeld had been dumped and the war was still going badly.

My short video on Hillary's problems:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUO8ZxcxOiI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. are you expecting honest answers out of these people?
they've controlled the debate for 6 years and its about time our people had their say. SO yes im glad they spend the majority of their allocation driving home points that wouldnt be heard by these people otherwise. They certainly arent talking to us lowly citizens and they damn sure wont pay attention to the media. This is the only time they can be told the truth about the frustration this country feels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. I would have liked to have had her for my lawyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC