Meg Whitman Won't Pledge to Stop Running Negative Ads

[Hatalles]

Run time: 04:56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hslVp8dc1ys   Posted on YouTube: October 26, 2010 By YouTube Member: JerryBrown2010 Views on YouTube: 305   Posted on DU: October 27, 2010 By DU Member: Hatalles Views on DU: 543

 

[efhmc]

1. Why should she? These ads are working their evil

all over our country to help elect the bigoted, right wing candidates. If they work, why give them up?

[bklyncowgirl]

3. Actually, they're not working all that well--Brown's up 10 points in thepolls

Admittedly he may have better negative ads than she does.

I don't live in California so I haven't been subject to the full onslaught of her $140 million. I imagine after a while people just tune it out.

Brown of course could afford at this point to be gracious and play to the crowd like any good politician would. Meg lost a chance there to show a whole 'nother side of her personality--if of course she has a side of her personality that's flexible, charming and positive.

[efhmc]

5. Good to hear.

[outerSanctum]

2. Virtually every candidate on both sides is using them.

Why would she agree to that?

[herbm]

7. There are negative ads and then there are negative ads. And not everybody is using them. I don't thi

nk using footage of Meg saying the crap she says is negative. Misciting Jerry's record in black and white with monster movie background music IS negative.

[greiner3]

4. "What a maroon, lol, what an Ignaranimus;"

Bugs Bunny

Oh wait, you were referencing Mag. I was referring to Matt.

Never mind.

[herbm]

6. Arnie was sitting closer to Jerry than Meg. Negative is all Meg has.