Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan: All About The Pipeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:54 PM
Original message
Afghanistan: All About The Pipeline
 
Run time: 05:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGMzfWvpB0E
 
Posted on YouTube: November 15, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 02, 2009
By DU Member: Joanne98
Views on DU: 898
 

If you want to seize control of the massive natural gas deposits in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, but you can't run a pipeline through Iran or Russia (because leaders there aren't US puppets), what do you do?

Easy. You invade Afghanistan, install your puppet president, have your troops guard the pipeline route, create the extremely lucrative side business of supplying the illegal occupation, announce that the whole charade is part of "The Global War on Terror," then change the name to "Overseas Contingency Operation," just to keep things fresh for all the people who actually trust what their TV tells them.



And THIS is why we can't get a public option. Because it would take away OUR tax dollars from the richest people in the world who are apparently TOO CHEAP to pay for their own EVIL crimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Pipeline destroyed the world trade center.....
evil pipeline. When are DUers going to boycott gas, oil, electricity and anything that it is used to make! IF you are serious boycott it all and lets see actual sacrifice. Right now the only sacrifice I see are from our military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh yeah We can just boycott energy. That will work!

How about giving us some of our OWN tax money to build alternative energy with?

We're sick of funding rich peoples crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And the 15 of the 19 were Saudi Arabian.
And they have Taliban style Sharia law in place over there too. But they're Bush pals and have dutifully supplied us with oil for a long time now.

ONE TRILLION DOLLARS SPENT SO FAR ON THE BUSH WARS.

ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

Nebulous War on Terror can run past one trillion dollars in LESS THAN A DECADE. And still not be done.

But freedom from medical terror, national health security for the American people must be Revenue Neutral.

What a deranged country we have become.

The American People have sacrificed a lot by letting our Congress pour more into the military budget than the rest of the world COMBINED does-- we've given up national health insurance, free high-quality education through college, better social security, day care at the work place, independent alternate energy sources, etc. etc. etc.

The Bush Gang let OBL go twice-- why do you suppose they would do that? The first time suits their imperial executive power concept-- you can't tell us we gotta produce evidence to try OBL. But the second time, when we were all excited that he had been cornered in Afghanistan-- why would the Bush Gang just let him go and turn to Iraq ? Had to be something bigger than catching AMerica's Greatest Enemy. Operation Iraqi Liberation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. right on the mark (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Arghh. I accidentally
unrec'd this. I'm sorry. Kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. evening kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sure was convenient for Junior and the Dick that 9/11 happened when it did.
Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's this too...
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 02:58 PM by Skink
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/business/energy-environment/03greenjobs.html?ref=us


S.GREENHOUSE
Published: December 2, 2009
The Great Green Hope for lifting America’s economy is not looking so robust.


Alex Brandon/Associated Press
Barack Obama, when he was seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, visited a wind turbine being built in Pennsylvania.

President Obama, both during his campaign and in his first year in office, has promoted the promise of new jobs in cutting-edge, nonpolluting industries, and such green jobs will be a major issue at his jobs “summit” meeting Thursday.

But, increasingly, skeptics who point to the need for more jobs are wondering why he is not doing more to create green jobs faster.

Growth in clean energy industries and in green jobs has been considerably slower and bumpier than anticipated, industry experts say.

But rather than giving up on its green jobs mantra, the White House will rededicate itself to promoting green industries at the jobs meeting, which will bring together business and labor leaders, politicians and economists.

The initial promise of green jobs was based on governments around the world declaring the fight against global warming to be a priority. The theory was that jobs in environmentally minded companies would grow rapidly as a result. But instead, some green-industry companies have been shedding jobs in the United States, and in some cases moving them to China.

Last week, the Gamesa wind turbine plant in western Pennsylvania announced it was laying off nearly half its 280 workers. Last month, General Electric said it would close a solar panel factory in Delaware, while Evergreen Solar, which received $58 million in state aid to build a 900-employee plant northwest of Boston, said it would move some assembly to China, costing 250 jobs.

There are myriad reasons why green jobs have grown more slowly than hoped. The clean energy component of the $787 billion stimulus package has only recently started to kick in. Energy experts say that banks, which have been reluctant to lend generally, have been especially loath to lend for alternative energy projects.

And renewable-energy companies are hesitating to invest in new plants and equipment before Congress enacts new environmental mandates, like cap and trade, to limit carbon emissions. In addition, the long recession (along with correspondingly slack energy demand) caused the clean-energy industry to delay expansion plans.

As a result, the United States is likely to install just one-eighth as much new solar power this year as Germany does, and China is expected to surpass the United States this year as the leader in adding new wind energy capacity.

“The renewable energy industry in the U.S. is an underdeveloped developing industry,” said Michael Peck, director of external affairs for Gamesa USA, a Spanish-owned company that has two wind turbine factories in Pennsylvania. “Manufacturers, developers, utilities, financiers — they don’t see the legislative pieces that they’re all hoping for to help the industry move forward.”

Recently, the Obama administration has taken several steps it says will soon produce thousands of green jobs. In August, it announced $2.3 billion in tax credits that will go to manufacturers of clean energy technologies. It has also allocated $6 billion for loan guarantees that could, in turn, generate $60 billion in investments.

The administration notes that Solyndra, a company that makes solar photovoltaic panels in Fremont Calif., received a $535 million loan guarantee to finance a manufacturing plant, creating 3,000 construction jobs and 1,000 permanent jobs.

In addition, the government’s $11 billion program to modernize the nation’s power grid — to make it easier to absorb electricity generated by wind and solar power — is just getting off the ground, officials say. They say the weatherization part of the stimulus package has already put many people to work in California, Ohio, Georgia and other states, and that number is expected to more than double this winter and spring.

While many green industry executives and environmental experts applaud these efforts, they say more needs to be done. Some note that even with the administration’s recent moves, it has spent less than one-fourth of the $80 billion clean energy component of the stimulus package.

Administration officials boast that the $80 billion figure is by far the largest amount ever committed to renewable energy.

Within industry and the environmental movement, there are recurring calls for Congress to require the nation to generate 15 percent or 20 percent of its energy through renewable sources by a specific year, say 2020. General Electric, which has 10,000 wind turbines in the United States, says that to encourage growth in the wind industry, the nation should adopt a target of obtaining 12 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2012.

“The clean energy market is gigantic and growing,” said Phyllis Cuttino, a director of the Pew Charitable Trusts’ Environmental Group. “The U.S. has a rich manufacturing base, a well educated work force and we are an innovation center. But if we don’t have the policies in place to make investment here a sure thing, then we could potentially lose to other countries. Other countries are jumping in. They have policies to take a lot of projects to scale, and that’s what’s missing in the United States.”

Nathaniel Bullard, a solar analyst at the research firm New Energy Finance, added, “In the U.S. there are problems arranging the project financing that is driving growth in countries like Spain.” Spain ranks second behind Germany and ahead of the United States in adding annual solar capacity.


A blog about energy, the environment and the bottom line.

Even so, many wind and solar companies are expanding in the United States, often in states with renewable energy standards. First Solar is starting a fourth production line at its photovoltaic cell factory in Perrysburg, Ohio, adding 140 jobs to the 560 there. First Solar also hopes to use federal loan guarantees to build a 30-megawatt generating facility in Cimarron, N.M., creating 200 construction jobs.

A Dow Corning joint venture in Midland, Mich., is building a plant to make silicon wafers for photovoltaic cells. In a surprise to many, Suntech, the giant Chinese solar manufacturer, is building a factory in the Phoenix area — to expand in the American market and deflect protectionist pressures.

These modern factories are forcing some older, less efficient factories to close, especially with China’s surge in solar panel production pushing down prices by 30 percent.

Rhone Resch, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said there would be more such investment in the United States if it had incentives like those in China, Malaysia or South Korea.

“In China, 80 percent of the entire cost of a factory and worker training is paid for by the government,” Mr. Resch said. “Malaysia will give you a 10- or 20-year tax holiday.”

He praised Mr. Obama’s $2.3 billion tax credit program, but said its 30 percent credits were not nearly as generous as China’s.

Mr. Resch said it was important to remember that for every solar manufacturing job there are 8 to 10 jobs installing solar panels. That is hardly reassuring to advocates of American manufacturing who argue that the renewable energy industry needs to have lots of $20-an-hour factory jobs and not just $10-an-hour installation jobs.

“As a country we need to make a decision that we do or don’t want to be a leader in this area,” said Cathy Calfo, executive director of the Apollo Alliance, a coalition of business, environmental, labor and community groups pushing for clean energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC