Dana Perino 'We Did Not Have A Terrorist Attack During Bush's Term'

[tomm2thumbs]

Run time: 01:03 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kpfhGxJbLc   Posted on YouTube: November 25, 2009 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: November 25, 2009 By DU Member: tomm2thumbs Views on DU: 6747

 

Right after Perino talks about facing up to things and calling things for what they are, she immediately denies there was ever any terrorist attack on America during Bush's term.

This idiot is so deep in stupidity she could hang posters.

[liberal N proud]

1. Where was she in 2001?

Of course she was on the all propaganda channel FAUX

[damonm]

2. Apparently, that was Al Gore's term...

[Farzan]

56. I just thought of a defense for the Gitmo guys....

"What terrorist attack your honer!? Never happened!"

[icee2]

3. She's right. 9/11 was an inside job. n/t

[go west young man]

4. If Bush and company did it they would be domestic terrorists.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

43. they just hire patsies

[ScottLand]

5. I must have missed something.

Is this an admission of complicity? Maybe she's having a Rumsfeld moment like when he accidentally mentioned the guys who "shot down the plane over Pennsylvania".

[jamesofthecommons]

79. 911-false Flag

No Scottland,you have not missed anything.The truth will not be repressed forever.

Because the cabal behind 911 felt they were actualy doing what was ''best'' for corporate American interests,if we listen closly to what these elites say, we will find that they gradualy let the truth be known.These are an arrogant and head strong people who by and large have accomplished the goals which 911 was meant to facilitate.People with the audacity to play god can not for long contain their arrogance.Many of the details of 911 are currently classified,''supposedly for national security reasons'' I would look for that information to gradualy be made public at a pace dependent upon the elites need to show their prowerness and the publics acceptance of the premise that the powers that be have the right to decide who lives and who dies for the sake of corporate globalism.

[BOSSHOG]

6. And bush was a war hero in the 70's

not a drunken frat boy who deserted his Champaign Unit to avoid a drug test.

[Jack Rabbit]

7. On Hannity's program, no less

Let's revise history, Stalinist style.

Let's see . . . what would make these reprobates happy?

On September 11, 2001, under the incompetent watch of Bill Clinton who was more interested in getting some than protecting the American people, the United States was attacked by al Qaida, operatives of which had hijacked airplanes and crashed them into the world trade center and the Pentagon. Clinton had ignored warnings of an al Qaida attack, including a CIA briefing giving to him on August 6 while he was fucking an intern in the Oval Office, that actually gave the flight numbers and the seats assigned to the highkackers. And still Clinton did nothing.

Fortunately for America, the presidency was taken over the very next day by the dashing, handsome and decisive George W. Bush, who quickly discovered that the hijackers were under the direct command of Saddam Hussein, the evil Iraqi dictator who was in league with Satan, like all Islamic fundamentalists. So, the heroic Bush told Saddam to get rid of his weapons of mass destruction (he had built the biggest stockpile of nukes since the fall of the evil empire, the Soviet Union). When Saddam laughed (he had a laugh that sounded like Jabba the Hutt), the swashbuckling Bush flew to Iraq and, under the protectiion of God, commanded a whirlwind to destroy Saddam and his weapons. And the world lived happily, prosperously and peacefully for the rest of the Blessed Bush's days in power.

[robo50]

12. Hillarious...That's really how it was, according to some Palin supporters.

They have that little knowledge of the last 10 years of history.

[SkyIsGrey]

75. They have little knowledge...

n.t.

[winyanstaz]

17. haha...yes that is how they would love to rewrite history.....

[Beartracks]

35. Really, on Hannity? Did Sean call her on her mistake?

Or did he just sort of agree, like: "Yeah, it does seem like the attack was the result of Democratic policies, so you might as well blame it on Clinton..."? Or some kind of cover-up like that. :puke:

[alp227]

45. K&R!!!!! +1!!!!!!

:rofl:

But seriously, if you want the truth, replace "Bill Clinton" with "chimp"...erhm sorry "George W. Bush", "getting some" with "vacationing in his Texas ranch", "he was fucking an intern" with "golfing", remove the references to the flight numbers (if I'm not mistaken), remove the "very next day" phrase. Still overall some funny stuff.

Oh yeah, need I not mention that the US Supreme Court voted for Bush, but the people voted for Clinton's second-in-order, Al Gore? Imagine what'd happen if everything in August happened before 9/11, but Gore was in office and did the same damn things as Bush did. Could you imagine how much liberal-bashing would be going on in the "liberally biased media"? How much investigation would go on revealing how Al Gore was partying instead of taking his job seriously? He'd get impeached and convicted, since the Republicans would take over Congress in 2002 prior to the impeachment vote. Ouch. (It took all the way for July 2008 for a representative to even submit articles for impeachment of Bush, and the Democrat-controlled House just did nothing.)

[BobTheSubgenius]

57. Un-f'ing-believable.

How does she not fall down more?

[spiritual_gunfighter]

8. Dana "what the fuck is the Cuban Missle Crisis" Perino:

my favorite Republican appointed to a post by the Obama administration!

[FarLeftFist]

9. Wait. What!?

[Joanne98]

10. Like all conservative women, Perino is a pathological LIAR!

[ejpoeta]

11. and of course the main talking head on the show corrected her.

[rhiannon55]

38. Nope. No one corrected her. nt

[ejpoeta]

80. i know.

[janedum]

13. So, WHY did Obama just appoint her to the Broadcasting Board of Governors?

[winyanstaz]

18. I am getting to the point where I think he is one of the far right now.....

[debbierlus]

31. Did he? I know she was a candidate. Well, that is the least of his crimes

[still_one]

67. Because Obama isn't that good as many of us thought he was going to be

Yes, compared to mccain, and the republicans, that was the only choice, but not the best

From the Cuban missile crisis to inane comments like this, you don't just appoint an idiot to fill a bipartisan post, you find someone who is competent

[driver8]

14. Unbefuckinglievable...

Just when I think that these asshole can't sink any lower...they sink lower.

[Cha]

15. Well, she just digs her own grave with a stupid

stick.

[hypocrisyandlies]

16. Someone contact Fox...

Doesn't this fall under their new "Zero Tolerance" policy? Or is that only for the poor interns and other lowly employees that get blamed for "mistakes" like using the wrong footage?


Edited to put mistakes in quote marks...

[proReality]

20. That's for the few Democrats they interview. n/t

[proReality]

19. I swear she has early onset Alzheimer's.

And what's with the two stooges who know better not correcting her?

[PghTiny]

21. Buffy the truth slayer strikes again!

[ljm2002]

26. "Buffy the truth slayer"!!!

OMG that is perfect, that's what I'm calling her from now on!

[Hulk]

22. this idiot has always been "clueless"...

Honestly...that's why they hired this clueless bitch. Put a dense little blond in front of the hungry press, and you can just play stupid and cute for awhile. It worked.

She is so far from having any real measurable intelligence. You have to remember...she came in on the heals of a "squealer" and "tony snow the right wing hack". They had played out all their cards.

[AlbertCat]

23. C'mon! We all know she means after "the late unpleasantness" of 9/11/01

And of course, Why would the terrorists attack us again after the phenomenal success of 9/11? It's STILL working for them!

Thanks Bush! (How do you say that in Farsi?)

[DumbBassRepublicans]

58. Before 9/11, After 9/11......

In bush's mind, he didn't become president UNTIL 9/11.
Before that, he was a know-nothing, do-nothing, P.O.S.
Kind of like he was, AFTER 9/11, and kind of like he is
NOW....
:)
LOL...!!!!!

[tridim]

24. By 2012 they'll be claiming that Bush killed Bin Laden.

I just listened to 5 minutes of Limbaugh and he's doing the same thing. They're all trying to muddy up the waters of actual history. It's easy when 99% of your audience is dirt stupid.

[dhpgetsit]

25. What, does she think New York, Washington DC and Shanksville PA are part of the UK???

I think she's been hitting the bottle or something.

[BAPhill]

27. This is how....

they re-write history. They will get people to believe it and re-peat it...until it's considered the truth.

[JHB]

28. Right. They absorb the "no attacks after 9/11" meme, then...

...they just forget that inconvenient qualifier. And if you call them on it, they say "Obviously, I meant....", forgetting the anthrax, the attacks in foreign cities, the nearly daily attacks in Iraq, etc.

[Turborama]

37. It won't be long until they try and make their viewers believe 9/11 was Obama's fault

n/t

[NICO9000]

29. I know they love historical revisionism, but this is ridiculous

She's always been a bald-faced liar and a stupid one at that, but this downright scary. And WTF was Obama thinking by appointing her to a board of anything other than one that involves water? Very disappointing.

[suzanner]

30. this poor excuse is not fit for a position above filing

let alone on our dime; anyone got an email address for WH? Please send this video.

[democracy1st]

32. K & R I hope they refuse her butt the position for lying

[SalmonChantedEvening]

33. Nothing quite like a big, steaming bag of Perino Dumb Chow.

:smoke:

[Mithreal]

34. Embarassing and our President hires her.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/obama-has-a-job-for-dana-perino-really/

[go west young man]

73. The article states "upon approval by the senate".

During her Senate confirmation hearings the Dems need to bring this question up to her directly and then kick her ass out of the chmaber. She's a lying sack a doo doo.

[TankLV]

36. Amazing, isn't it!!!

[usregimechange]

39. 911 doesn't count I guess

[ImOnlySleeping]

70. I guess that confirms

It was an inside job :tinfoilhat:

[and-justice-for-all]

40. Why the hell did Obama give the tool a job!?

What the fuck! :mad:

[quakerboy]

51. +1

WTF indeed.

[DailyGrind51]

41. Because Bush wasn't really President, Cheney was! I get it Dana.

[tomm2thumbs]

52. +1 ahh, very observant

so she was technically correct

[defendandprotect]

42. 9/11 MIHOP . . .

[Maestro]

44. The stupid hurts!

:banghead:

[Stumbler]

46. Will Fox "apologize" for this "accidental rewriting of history?" I'm not holding my breath...

[NBachers]

47. Uhh, ya know, every roadside bomb, every attack on troops and civilians

in the theatre of war, every car bomb and trap executed against Americans . . .

Whether it happened here or in another part of the world, it was still an attack on Americans . . .

But I guess the dead troops who can't vote, or the ones permanently maimed or disfigured, I guess they don't matter . . .

oh yeah, wasn't there some other Pearl Harbor-type event during the bush administration? or was that just part of their domestic program . . .

[earcandle]

48. what a fucking dupe just happened right before your eyes. If you can get this level of paradox and

realize what is happening, you can counter. 

If you don't see that she just said that something was true
and false at the same time.

Do you know what that does for selective listening?

Come on guys... get a grip and get a handle.

[underpants]

49. Uh........... Embassy Bombing??? --- aside, obviously, from 9/11

Smoke is seen billowing outside the U.S. embassy in Sanaa September 17, 2008.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1841951,00.html#ixzz0XwAV1kk7

[underpants]

50. 4,000 American citizens dead in Iraq

those weren't terrorist attacks?

[Loki]

53. The DSM IV

should now include Republicanism and conservatism in it's lists of mental illnesses. The absence of reality based thinking is stunning. I have no clue what world these people inhabit.

[Quantess]

54. Did either of those douchebags next to her even hear what she said?

You would think that at least one of those numbskulls would have corrected such an OBVIOUS gaffe.

[Triana]

55. Uh-huh. WHAT PLANET is she referring to? n/t

[LiberalLovinLug]

59. If the Lie is big enough

and told over and over the Bush team proved that you can catapult the propaganda

The Bush team is still intact, with no fear of retribution. Dana is still working the talking points.

By 2020, Clinton will have started the Iraq war and responsible for Bin Laden's crime, Obama will be a recession causing leader, who failed to keep up the fight against terrorism and responsible for every Muslim American's crime which will be always regarded as a terrorist act. Lord help him if an actual highly deadly attack happens during his term.

:hide:

[Loudmxr]

60. Not to mention the ANTHRAX attack or were those oxycontin Cheney was poppin'?

How the privileged got the high dosage antibiotics still rankles me. Heck Dana knows some of these people who were poppin' those pills!!! :smoke:

[Sherman A1]

62. I was wondering if someone was going to mention the

Anthrax attacks and I consider the DC Area Sniper a Terrorist attack as well, so Dana may have missed a few points.......:banghead:

[NewJeffCT]

71. The DC Sniper was also an avowed terrorist, and there were almost monthly

terror attacks on family planning clinics throughout the country.

[SKKY]

61. Really? None? Well, I know some Spaniards, Brits, Malaysian, and Israelis who beg to differ...

...but, since you're framing the discussion for your benefit, sure. We haven't had any terrorist attacks IN THE US since 9/11. But, last time I checked, we still have allies around the world.

[harun]

63. How Orwellian

1984...

Book One, Chapter 3

"If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say this or that even, it never happened—that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death."

"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'"

"Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct; nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary."

[PatrynXX]

64. That was the stupidest thing yet I've heard from these fruits

So 3000 dead is nothing but under 20 dead is a terrorist attack. These things have happened with real white guys. How many high school shootings happened under Bush's watch then?

I do remember they called the ELF/ALF a terrorist group once. Which despite they tend to be a bit too far, I wouldn't call terror. Nobody got killed recently using the ELF.


This was simply a murder scene. Call it what it is. Are the soldiers in Fort Hood going to bow to terror? Are they terrorized? Certainly Dana is a wimp and is terrorized. And she was no where near. The right wing seems to be chickens ever since 9/11. Stand up and be an American you pieces of dung. I heard about this possible war tax... out of all the taxes, that would be one of the better one. I can't go over there and risk my life, now why would I be bitching about taxes to help pay for it. What a bunch of losers these little wimps are.

[onlyadream]

65. We'll be seeing that on the Daily Show - I'm sure. nt

[stlsaxman]

66. "Right Wing Media Barbie" does it again!

[LynneSin]

68. You know I let it slide with the crooked "R" labeled "D" and the wrong protest footage (2 times)

But seriously - how much more bullshit are they going to try and pull on us? Teh Stupid - it BURNS!!!

[LynneSin]

69. and btw although it was a terrorist attack - because anyone gunning down people is a terrorist...

this has nothing to do with Muslims attacking in our country. The reason Obama's administration probably isn't screaming that is because this guy was PTSD to the infinite degree.

[guappo1]

72. Rewriting History!!!!!

I knew that the members of Bush's Administration were not as
smart as most people, but I would never thought that one would
try and rewrite 9/11 history so soon. They have tried in the
past to lay blame on the Clinton Presidency with out effect,
but to make statement like that OMG, Well Bill that finally
laid it all on you.
Ooops I just noticed that she was on Faux News,  Never Mind.

[BeatleBoot]

74. Pathological Liars

pathological liars, these republicans.

And they can say it with a straight face

The only party I know that can look you in the eye and tell you water isn't wet.

Sick.

[MidwestTransplant]

76. She probably believes it too

[DallasNE]

77. Perino Is Right

They did not have "a" terrorist attack during Bush's terms, just as they did not have "a" recession during Bush's terms as "a" implies just one. As we all know, there were more than one of each.

[L. Coyote]

78. REC 40 = UP is DOWN in Idiot Land, my friends.

Idiot Land is like Wonderland, except real people instead of Doormouse get waterboarded by teabaggers instead of at a tea party. :rofl:

[bamacrat]

81. And neither one of the ditto heads mentioned 9/11. I guess they blame that on Clinton.

Even though had we been hit on January 21 it would have been Obamas fault.

[niceypoo]

82. *cough* except that one time *cough*

[CJCRANE]

83. Just another example of "The Republican Mind Trick".

It's like the Jedi Mind Trick (you say something and the other person instantly believes it's true)...
except it only works on conservatives.