Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Campaign Advisor Nicolle Wallace Responds To Palin's Charges Via The Rachel Maddow Show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:16 AM
Original message
Former Campaign Advisor Nicolle Wallace Responds To Palin's Charges Via The Rachel Maddow Show
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 04:15 AM by Turborama
 
Run time: 08:04
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jreaZrrsNe4
 
Posted on YouTube: November 18, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: November 18, 2009
By DU Member: Turborama
Views on DU: 1681
 
I've purposefully avoided posting anything about Palin but I'm intrigued that this latest case of Republican fratricide is now being taken directly to Rachel.



Nov. 17: Rachel Maddow discusses statements by former McCain campaign staffer Nicolle Wallace to The Rachel Maddow Show about Sarah Palin's new book with Ana Marie Cox of Air America Radio.

Statements by Nicolle Wallace to TRMS

Former McCain adviser responds to charges in Sarah Palin's new book

The following quotes were made exclusively to a producer for The Rachel Maddow Show:

On how Couric was chosen to interview Palin:

"The whole notion there was a conversation where I tried to cajole her into a conversation with Katie is fiction.... I am not someone who throws around the word 'self-esteem.' It is a fictional description. Katie Couric was selected because we did evening anchors.... I did not advocate an interview for anyone I am friends with."

On preparation and expectations for the Couric interview:

"We set up this interview on the day of the U.N. General Assembly, with a walk-and-talk in front of the U.N. It was never made as two working gals. It's either rationalization or justification or fiction. That was supposed to be to highlight her foreign policy savvy the U.N. General Assembly. The picture is in front of the U.N. to highlight her expertise and readiness to be Vice President -- it wasn't about two working gals."

On her overall reaction to Palin's book:

"I think she has probably a legitimate complaint that things could have been better conceived and executed. A book about that would have been painful but not entirely unfair. What she gets wrong is this personalization that Schmidt and I were these lone villains -- and that took place entirely in her imagination. Just like the Obama and Clinton campaigns, we were consensus driven.... I think she fixated on me from very early on. She hated me from the beginning. I try not to take it personally, the fact is that she wrote a book based on fabrications. She gave a brilliant convention speech -- other interviews that inspired support. But this book is a bizarre fixation on things that everyone else has moved on from."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34005388/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/


:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow
being called out as a liar from your own party has to sting. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Palin apparently has so many lies in that book, it would TAKE a staff of AP writers to find them all

She is going to be digging ever deeper into the sands of time with this winner -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cox: "After this book- who would ever want to be a campaign staffer of hers?"
Answer: no one with a brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curiousdemo Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let's hook this book up to some....
polygraph wires, so we can see it blow up....Which is a good thing...Gabooom! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe either one of them.
This Nicolle Wallace seems like a shifty character herself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Support your statement with some examples or reasons so we can be
informed or persuaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The sole basis for my distrust of Wallace (founded or not) is...
...the fact that she worked as a spinmeister for the dirty McCain campaign. Don't get me wrong I despise caribou barbie as much as the next guy(or gal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hmorehead Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What don't you believe and how can you believe niether of then???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Sarah is the proven fabricator. She is a total fool. It is sad and scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. she is a professional victim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC