Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman calls Ft. Hood attack most destructive terrorist act on American soil since 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:26 PM
Original message
Lieberman calls Ft. Hood attack most destructive terrorist act on American soil since 9/11
 
Run time: 03:29
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl3qFCiaClM
 
Posted on YouTube: November 08, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: November 08, 2009
By DU Member: Amerigo Vespucci
Views on DU: 2196
 
"...but we don't know."

Sets the whole 9/11 thing up nicely, wrapping it in caveats like "it's too soon to tell."

Whatta piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Terrorism is aimed at civilians
So whatever it is, it is not really terrorism, even if it was a politically motivated mass murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Good catch
I'm not even completely convinced it was politically motivated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Good point!
I'm not completely convinced the so-called victims actually were killed or wounded, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. So..people were killed, the shooter's a Muslim
therefor it's so obvious the guy's a terrorist sleeper cell you don't even need the
:sarcasm: thingy? Is that what Pox News is telling you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Every good liberal knows that no Muslim would ever hurt a fly.
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 10:10 PM by burning rain
You're obviously the Fox-watching bigot. No doubt the same CIA agents who invented false stories of fanatical statements by Hasan cooked up a hoax of people killed and wounded, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. It doesn't really matter if he's OBL himself incognito...
it still doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Well, being rather strict with the meanings of words, I'm inclined to agree.
At the same time, though, language changes with mass usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. It's hard enough to get a universal definition of the word in the first place
The only thing most seem to agree on is the intentional targeting of civilians for political purposes.

Of course the exception is Faux news. A local firing mortar shells in the green zone or someone who sets off an IED under a humvee is a terrorist per their definition. So it kinda makes Lieberman's ignorance a bit easier to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. True, the real warhawks call it terrorism....
when irregular forces in Iraq (for example) take up arms and attack US forces. That's a very stupid corruption of the meaning of terrorism. Much as I hate to see US forces killed, I recognize that our forces in Iraq are unwelcome occupiers in the eyes of most Iraqis, and it doesn't pay to define our perspective as the only legitimate one for Iraqis. That's just thick, but what can you expect of warmongers. But, when you're dealing with an attack on US forces on US soil--unarmed and cooling their heels in a troop center, to boot--that's something that I'll bet most Americans will regard as terrorism if politically motivated, and an area where accepted usage will likely change, or at least be seriously disputed--and not just by warhawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Exactly. The problem comes in when you start calling everyone a terrorist
...and you have morans like Bush declaring a war on terrorism. So are we now at war with every potentially psychotic idiot who might someday wake up and decide to go shoot up a military base? As if we ever had a chance of winning a war against an asymmetric strategy (which was a stupid idea to begin with), now we must also win it against every dipshit who licks the wrong toad, picks up a gun, and goes off the farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. The likes of Bush never intended to fight a comprehensive war on terror.
That would have had us fighting not just al-Qaida, but Hamas, Hezbollah--hell!--the Tamil Tigers, various and sundry Maoists, any senescent survivors of the Baader-Meinhof Gang or Italy's Red Brigades that got a wild hair up their ass. In practical terms, the War on Terror rhetoric served to put us on a war footing against whatever predominantly Muslim country the war party wanted to move against (in the event, Iraq, and McCain certainly would have taken us to war with Iran had he won), besides keeping the US citizenry hyped up, and creating a milieu in which critics and opponents of war could be lambasted for caving or "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy. I really wouldn't be surprised if some of the more inveterate and demagogic warmongers slandered the president's plans for drawing down the Iraq War as a shameful and cowardly cave to Maj. Hasan's foul act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I agree. It was really more of a political experiment
Terrorism has been used as a tool by America from its inception all the way to modern times. Bush's dad even used his political capital to rescue known terrorists from Argentina who bombed an airliner full of women and children and they still walk the streets in America free to this very day.

With every new presidential administration, there has to be political payoffs made to the base who got them there. Shrub's political payoff to the neocons was fufilling their dream of exporting democracy by force. Terrorism, or at least the irrational fear of it, was the trojan horse that allowed them to do it. It's pretty evil if you think about it much, but to the GOPhers, it was just business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. interesting
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 06:32 PM by tomm2thumbs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Inciting fear and anger among the citizens before any investigation
has been complete. Of course, the Hawks have to keep the
Terra thing going. War, War, War. There is a terrorist
behind every tree--War War War. Check under your bed, there
may be a terrorist there. Get those 40,000 troops to Afghanistan.

I respect the fact that there is a serious problem with terrorists.
It has been commented on by many knowledgeable people that the
Paranoia in WH during last administration led us down the wrong
path. There is a difference between rational concern and paranoia.

Keeping Americans all roiled up does no one a service.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lieberman is a terrorist.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. When I try to remember something good about bush stealing the presidency in 2000
I consider that it prevented this piece o shit from being a heartbeat away from the office.

WTF was Al Gore thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I have asked myself that 100 times
WTF was Gore thinking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I've always thoght it was part of a deal
There is no way that Gore would have picked him without a lot of pressure.

I think the fix was in from the beginning ~ LIEman was taking secrets back to the Republicans and the votes were fixed from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bring on 2010 when he will no longer count and we can count him as a Republican , which he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. and non of the other soldiers throughout the decade were terrorists
lovely. single out the Muslim's. That won't sit well. Lets increase the amount of racism Joe go ahead.


:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why does this look staged or choreographed by Lieberman?
My wife says it sounds like propaganda.

If we aren't careful, Joe Lieberman is going to end up with more power and we are going to have a lot more fellow Americans terrorized by people like Lieberman and the fox "patriots".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. I assume that Lieberman wants us to use this
incident to justify bombing Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. How many people were shot dead during the looting in New Orleans?
These were civilians, some were looting, others were trying to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Umm, anthrax?
Total disruption of the postal service? How soon Lieberman forgets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Roger that. Congress and the media threatened. Postal Service on alert.
Guess that doesn't rise to the level of terror to Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Think ya know what it's all about ?
Lieberman called the Fort Hood massacre an act of "Islamist extremism" - even as top Army brass warned Sunday against guessing at a motive, fearing backlash against Muslim soldiers.

An Army chaplain asked worshipers at Fort Hood to pray for the victims of the tragedy - and also for Hasan and his family.

"Lord, all those around us search for motive, search for meaning, search for something, someone to blame. That is so frustrating," Col. Frank Jackson told a group of about 120 people gathered at the post's chapel.

"Lord, teach us to love and pray for those who rise up against us and pray for those who do us harm. We pray for Maj. Hasan."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/11/08/2009-11-08_top_army_official_fears_retaliation_on_muslim_soldiers_in_wake_of_ft_hood_massac.html

FOX Interviews Major Malik Hasan's Cousin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ91hn_f6yU

Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also INTO YOU....What did the Major know? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv_I5VcgPcY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. don`t look now joe but
your hatred of the arabs and islam is showing.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Lieberman is a terrorist, a traitor, the worst of the worst. What should be done with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. No connection to terror groups or conspirators
A preliminary review of the computer of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the accused shooter in Thursday's rampage at Fort Hood in which 13 people were killed, has revealed no evidence of any connection to terror groups or conspirators, according to law enforcement officials.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/08/national/main5578580.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. I guess VA Tech doesn't count
Or the 45,000 people A YEAR who die because of not having health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManicZen Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sounds like .....
Someone who was under an extraordinary amount of pressure from the nature of his job, as well as the victim of constant harassment. My guess is that he is far less a zealot than someone who turned to negativity as an outlet for his helplessness. Strikes me as similar to the reaction of a student bullied who ultimately snaps. To label this as a terrorist attack is opportunistic and irresponsible.

I certainly do not condone his actions, and my heart goes out to all the victims and their families. Unfortunately as many try to understand and work to prevent occurrences like this there are many who will seize upon this to advance their own agenda. The truth is of course not relevant.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Which state do we bomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. He's shown himself over and over again
to be as stupid as Bush and McCain. He's a paid shill who holds no love for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. When President Obama advised not to jump to conclusions
He was apparently referring to kneejerk idiots such as Joe Lieberman, which is pretty much like talking to the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Lieberman is a hateful little man...
He should always go on Fox News to show people where his allegiance lies. (keyword: Lies)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. (I) for Imbecile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. When this happened I knew that ClusterFox couldn't wait
To put a terrorism label on it, their still pissed 9/11 happened on Bush's watch. Isn't that sick, seriously, if you think about it Fox actually wants a terrorist act to happen on Obama's watch so much that they won't even wait for a final conclusion, just already giving it a label of terrorism. They want to be able to point fingers. Effin heartless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. He must have forgotten about the "Beltway sniper attacks?"
Strip that SOB of his chairmanship and let him follow his new party to their proverbial graves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. I think Lieberman may be the presedential candidate in 2012 for the Republicans
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 02:39 PM by reggie the dog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. Hasan Lawyer: 'Going to Protect All His Rights'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. Oy. What a total jackass.
Why do we have to be THAT much of a "big tent"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC