Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Put Cheney Under Oath & Ask Him About His Actions on 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Put Cheney Under Oath & Ask Him About His Actions on 9/11
 
Run time: 09:41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmu5daHO7ZQ
 
Posted on YouTube: May 21, 2007
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: May 21, 2007
By DU Member: reprehensor
Views on DU: 1844
 
Why? Because he can't seem to stick to one story. He contradicts himself and the 9/11 Commission's final report. So do other eyewitnesses, but the 9/11 Commission decided to just omit those accounts.

Was Cheney colluding with Rumsfeld to roll out "Continuity of Government" or, as researcher Peter Dale Scott calls it in this segment from a recent lecture, "Change of Government"?

Scott calls for the questioning of Cheney, under oath, regarding his actions on the morning of 9/11. He suggests that this could lead to early impeachment.

Were Cheney & Rumsfeld attempting to roll out the Shadow Government in a manner most UN-constitutional... and did they succeed?

Or is the best yet to come?

Full version of this lecture here;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x157046
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney doesn't seem to know what to do...
under oath, now does he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd settle for a look at the guest list and notes from his infamous "energy policy meeting"

Seems likely there's a straight line running from PNAC's "new Pearl Harbor" prattling, through the energy meeting, and right to the deadly quagmire in Iraq at this very moment.

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Throw in Ken Lay and you've got the picture.
Spring 2001 Secret Energy Task Force, Ken Lay, Dabhol, July & August PDBs, July G8 anti-aircraft precautions, sudden August month-long "vacations" for Bush & Cheney, and voila! 9/11 - it was everything they could have wished for and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read the article to your link: yet to come
Edited on Mon May-21-07 10:44 AM by snappyturtle
When I heard of the new presidential directive the president has signed I started looking at all the power this administration has gained through nefarious efforts. The article at the above link came up as did Cheney's orchestrating of events on 9/11. My take on all of this is that the administration is building its power bunker that will protect them when the revolution starts (I'm certain they're well aware of increasing impeachment threats). K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ops CableSplicer, GardenPlot, REX84, Ollie and martial law
all set to go in order to implement 'seizing oil fields', in this case the mothballed DOD plans to seize Saudi fields now 'tweaked' to Iraq's,

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/1973-j06.shtml

(I couldn't get the original Jan '04 NYTimes article by Liz Alvarez)

and in order to implement suppression of legitimate dissent during (contrived) 'wartime', the old FEMA designations for martial law etc were now transferred to Immigration and Customs Enforcment - ICE.

Other sites on the web already list the many Presidential executive orders 'legalizing' the destruction of the Constitution, so I won't go any futher.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. I always wonder about United 93..
what it's target was and how even worse things would have been if the Capitol had been demolished.

That would have been the de facto "Reichstag Fire"*.

I believe the flight being delayed and brought down by the passengers (or missile) saved constitutional govt from the final coup de grace. Of course it may come to pass that it only delayed the inevitable.

(*The twin towers demolition was the spectacle and the Pentagon hit was necessary to provide the casus belli - it being a military installation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I am sure they bungled
Edited on Mon May-21-07 01:03 PM by irislake
If the Capitol had been hit the coup would have been complete. Because they bungled they had to pull the anthrax bit to confuse the press and Dems while they re-thought the plan. Bush looked scared shitless while he waited in that school for all the planes to hit their targets. When the Capitol wasn't taken out he had to stay aloft in Airforce One while they tried to figure out how to deal with the fact that maybe they dare not go through with martial law and install the shadow-government-in-waiting.

I still expect them to take out the Capitol Building and finish off the Dems. Dirty bomb, anybody? Folks that ruthless can't afford to leave office and let all their misdeeds come to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cheney
What I want to know is why Cheney was put in charge of 'Operation Northern Guardian'
A military excercise that happened only on or about 9/11, the only VP in history
that I know of that was ever in charge of a military 'training' excercise....makes you wonder.

Operation Norther Guardian
Plane into building scenario excercise

Thats why on 9/11 you can hear the AF pilots ask the question, "Real World or excercise"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. They were called "Northern Vigilance", "Vigilant Guardian", "Global Guardian" etc
Edited on Mon May-21-07 11:47 AM by CGowen

September 9-11, 2001: NORAD Begins Northern Vigilance Military Operation

NORAD begins Operation Northern Vigilance. For this military operation, it deploys fighters to Alaska and Northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian Arctic and North Pacific Ocean, scheduled for September 10 to September 14. The Russian exercise involves its bombers staging a mock attack against NATO planes that are supposedly planning an assault on Russia. The NORAD fighters are due to stay in Alaska and Canada until the end of the Russian exercise. At some time between 10:32 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. on 9/11, Russian President Vladimir Putin will call the White House to say the Russians are voluntarily halting their exercise.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=operation_northern_vigilance

Lieutenant Colonel Dawne Deskins and other day shift employees at NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) in Rome, NY, start their workday. NORAD is conducting a week-long, large-scale exercise called Vigilant Guardian. Deskins is regional mission crew chief for the Vigilant Guardian exercise. Vigilant Guardian is described as “an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide”; as a “simulated air war”; and as “an air defense exercise simulating an attack on the United States.”


Plane into building was a NRO excercise


An “emergency response exercise” is scheduled to take place at 9 a.m. the morning of 9/11, involving the simulated crash of a small corporate jet plane into a government building. The exercise is to be conducted by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in Chantilly, Virginia—just four miles from Washington Dulles International Airport, from where Flight 77 took off, and 24 miles from the Pentagon.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a900nroexercise#a900nroexercise




NORTHERN GUARDIAN: The details of this exercise are still scant but it is considered to be part of Vigilant Guardian, relating to simulating hijacked planes in the north eastern sector.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ptech's software helps immensely I suppose
Ptech's 'notable clientele' includes the WH DOD and FAA,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptech

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good Find
Things like this just blow the mind

Makes you wonder If these are the people who helped 9/11 happen........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-21-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe, since he seems to like hiding out in a bunker, someone should
slam and lock the door the next time he goes to ground ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R for Peter Dale Scott!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC