Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TYT: Why Did President Obama Rephrase The Marijuana Question?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:44 PM
Original message
TYT: Why Did President Obama Rephrase The Marijuana Question?
 
Run time: 05:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etYrAZxCAKU
 
Posted on YouTube: March 27, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: March 27, 2009
By DU Member: ihavenobias
Views on DU: 2516
 


Also, Check Out These 5 Clips You May Have Missed:

1)-

2)-

3)-

4)-

5)-

PS---There are Also, you can Download the first hour of The Young Turks (M-F) free on Itunes. Also, if you haven't already, join the .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent video, K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, I was very annoyed by his brush-off of the issue in general.
Like Cenk said it was a top question.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Some have said that he *technically* didn't say he wasn't against legalization.
Rather, he said he didn't think legalization would help the economy. But I think that's an incredibly generous interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, well, I didn't see that at all.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. agricultural hemp would be immediately a 1/4 Trillion dollar industry, before it frees us from
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 05:08 PM by sam sarrha
foreign oil, THAT IS WHY IT IS ILLEGAL.. !! BEST, CLEANEST RENEWABLE BIO-DIESEL THERE IS. then there is the building materials, textiles, animal feed, human food, fiber for clothes, non acid paper..

http://www.jackherer.com/chapters.html

http://www.jackherer.com.html

my admiration for Obama went down the toilet... he isn't honest, he isn't progressive, no guts no balls, he wouldn't let the question be given.. worst sort of censorship..because he twisted the truth, then lied, i'll never watch him again.. it's over. just another dick weed Fascist politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Lest we forget the soy lobby and how it would be very hurt by industrial hempseed.
Soy has very little nutritional value as compared to hempseed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. 3 little peas in a pod... that taste like shit... compared to.... but i do like Tofu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldenuff Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yes...
I wish I could say that I don't agree with your statement...but I can't.

In my mind...He FLIPPED US OFF...and that doesn't set well with me,and I have a long memory.
My opinion of him just dropped like Larry Craigs trousers in a public restroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drexel dave Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. disgusting
how everyone in the audience (Obama included) just laughed about it.

How out of touch, not to mention downright sickening considering how many people are languishing in prison for a crime against nobody.

Same old, same old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Agree with Cenk
This was very disappointing. The war on drugs has been a huge failure. Our jails are filled to capacity with people whose only crime is having weed on them. I am friends with a guy that councils people in the county jail. He tells me that a lot of these inmates are people who got busted with weed with no priors. Is this a legacy Obama wants to attach himself to by reframing a legit question about the war on drugs. I think Obama is a smart guy and it is very disappointing and frankly surprising that he handled the question in such a manner. I am all for the legalization of marijuana, and no I don't smoke weed or have any desire to. But I don't think it should be illegal if someone else wants to. Wouldn't this help to eliminate the narco-gangs almost overnight? Sure they would find something else to sell but I think this would be a step in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freemarketer6 Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have a prescription for cannibis, and I can just go buy it without
hassle, except picking it out from so many different kinds. Still, Obama nonplussed me with his lame answer. That nonplussed state could be aided if Holder would fire the DEA head in SF for the medical marijuana bust last week. Obama appears much more political then I thought he would be. Maybe he has to be. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. On the money, as usual. Obama did all a dis-service.
By dumbing down the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, what a complete recharacterization of the original question!
Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. This isn't change we can believe in
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 08:20 PM by rollingrock
just more of the same old crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. KICK & R Mate! n/t
Edited on Fri Mar-27-09 09:20 PM by axollot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. I agree with Cenk, the question was totally distorted ....
why ask people to create an account and vote on questions if the number one question is treated this way.

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not a big Cenk fan, but he's right on with this critique.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Cenk said it perfectly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Politically untenable. I have to agree there. At least for now. I just don't see a majority of this country being behind it, even if it is the right thing to do.

It was voted up there. He could have addressed it with the gravity the most voted on issue deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. This country is so damn reactionary.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Agree with Cenk. Obama ducked. He sees himself more vulnerable than we do.
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 04:30 PM by Piewhacket
We should make sure Obama knows he has our solid support, but
that we expect a government responsive to the people.

The war on drugs (aka war on americans), like the war on
terror (aka war on america), is hurting AMERICA and must be
brought back from excess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrimReefa Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. I have no problem with Obama not trying to legalize weed
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 08:57 PM by GrimReefa
None whatsoever. What I DO have a problem with is "I don't know what does this says about our on-line audience."

Well, first of all, it says that we could grow up to be President. Obama himself has admitted to COCAINE use, which is something I have never tried nor do I want to ever try. It is addictive, it kills, and I have no reason to believe that it's use wouldn't plummet if marijuana were made a legal alternative.

But what really irks me is that the on-line audience is largely compromised of the very people who are responsible for his having his current vocation. It was just over one year ago that Obama lost the New Hampshire primary and the very next day broke his one day fundraising record, thanks to donations from largely of the VERY SAME PEOPLE who participate in these e-events his Administration is so proud of. We gave him the money and the volunteers he needed to compete nationwide in Super Tuesday, which was supposed to be Hillary's coup de grace, and set him up for his magical run through February and ulitmately to the White House. Now, we watch his weekly addresses, we get his e-mails, we act on behalf of his agenda. And yes, a lot of us think that this Drug War prosecuted by the Baby Boomers was a really bad idea, and we want to take the steps necessary to put it to an end. If Obama polled the coalition of people who voted for him - and more importantly, people who donated their time/money to helping his campaign - young people and minorities, I doubt he would still want to laugh this question off.

He doesn't want to spend the political capital it would take to legalize marijuana at this point in his administration - that's fine. Maybe, as a parent with two young daughters, he really doesn't want it legalized at ANY point. Given his personal history, that makes him a bit of a hypocrite, but that's ok, too. But he should show the people who are largely responsible for his being President a little more respect than that.

I mean, I'm assuming he'll want more of our time and money in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC