Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman Peter DeFazio : "The Republicans Are Sticking It To The American People!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:41 PM
Original message
Congressman Peter DeFazio : "The Republicans Are Sticking It To The American People!"
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 05:04 PM by Turborama
 
Run time: 05:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IR4R_G3N5Io
 
Posted on YouTube: February 13, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: February 13, 2009
By DU Member: Turborama
Views on DU: 2062
 
His homepage: http://www.defazio.house.gov/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. AMEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why isn't there more of this type of resistance against those Senators that
included more tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are no tax cuts for the rich in this bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. because
we have way too many complicit dems. Defazio rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Very STRONG K&R - Now that is what I am talking about -

Bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raystorm7 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. KICKASSREC!
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 05:47 PM by raystorm7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another item making me proud of moving to Oregon and our congressional delegation!

First it was hearing how Wyden helped p*ss off my old Senator from California DiFi with helping recommend Leon Panetta for the CIA leadership position to Obama!

Now DeFazio is doing well too. Heard him also on Hartmann this morning speaking very well on things too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Save the Theatrics. He turned around and voted against the package
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, that's right, he did. In addition to the OP, here's another video of him explaining why...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 06:05 PM by Turborama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEvrIOvvUBM"> DeFazio voted NO: Who's going to lend $800B to spend on Tax Cuts??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Sounds like a cop out. About as bad as the guy who voted present
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 06:11 PM by Thrill
I've always liked him. But he needed to vote with Obama here. Sounds like he's trying to give himself some cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Sounds like a man of principle to me...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 06:36 PM by Turborama
He should have been listened to, just now and in October.

If you look at the comments, you'll see that some of his constituents agrees.

The Progressive Gadfly: DeFazio Explains His 'No' on Stimulus

By Elana Schor - February 13, 2009, 4:07PM

Looking through the vote tally at the seven House Democrats who opposed the final stimulus bill today, you see reliably right-leaning members of the party's Blue Dog Coalition: Reps. Heath Shuler (D-NC), Bobby Bright (D-AL), Walt Minnick (D-ID), Pete DeFazio (D-OR) ... hold on.

DeFazio is a stalwart liberal and member of the Progressive Caucus. Why would he vote against the bill his party and president backed so strongly?

As DeFazio explained following the vote, he believed in the bill's education and transportation goals -- though he has long decried the stimulus' shortchanging of infrastructure relative to highways. "I couldn't justify borrowing money for tax cuts," he said. Tax breaks make up more than 35% of the final stimulus bill.

"Come on, school construction?" he asked, visibly frustrated that money for that goal had been sliced from the bill. "Why did that have to come out for more tax cuts?"

When asked about the need to bridge the gap between the House and Senate bills in order to win over the three GOP votes needed to prevent a filibuster, DeFazio was as blunt as can be: "We all know that's a convenient artifice from the Senate ... do away with the filibuster or have a real filibuster. It's convenient for . It gives them clout to push around the House and the president."

Whether you agree with DeFazio or not, liberal Democrats have rarely felt free to buck their party on major votes in recent years. It remains to be seen how the Obama administration and DeFazio's leadership will view his stance.

From (embedded links within): http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/the-progressive-gadfly-defazio-explains-his-no-on-stimulus.php

-- ---- --

Some interesting comments here, too: http://www.blueoregon.com/2009/02/stimulus-passes-house-defazio-votes-no.html">Blue Oregon: "Stimulus passes House, DeFazio votes no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You do not know what the fuck you are talking about
Just open your piehole and let crap spew out of it.

What Pete told me, one of his constituents, about his reasoning after 1st voting for it in the House:


Dear Victoria:


Thanks for contacting me about our current recession and the best way to stimulate the economy. Despite my skeptism of H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, I voted for the bill.

The economy is in the tank and unfortunately Oregon is in the deep end of the tank. Unemployment in Oregon has reached 9 percent, up from 5.4 percent one year ago. More Oregonians were out of work last month than any time since 1983. Locally, Lane County's unemployment rate rose to 9.5 percent, the county's highest rate in 24 years. Worse yet, Douglas County in one year has seen its unemployment increase by 50 percent to 12.8 percent. Our local economy is suffering from the loss of jobs including forestry and wood products, the semiconductor manufacturer Hynix, and two major RV manufacturers.


I voted in favor of H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, but not because I believe it is the best we can do. I voted in favor of the legislation because I am hopeful the package will be substantially improved by the legislative process and help alleviate the drastic job losses that are already occurring in Oregon. I am reserving my right to vote against the final version of this legislation if it is not substantially improved.



I fought for inclusion of key provisions to make sure Oregon would directly benefit from this stimulus. For example, H.R. 1 makes a $10 billion investment in public lands. After eight years of neglect under the Bush Administration, our public lands face many structural challenges, including a crumbling infrastructure in our National Parks, a large backlog of unused and obsolete Forest Service roads in need of decommissioning, abandoned mines in need of remediation, deferred maintenance work on Bureau of Land Management lands, and an extensive list of unfunded projects at the Bureau of Reclamation.



In rural towns facing severe economic challenges - including many communities in my district and in the state of Oregon - contractors and agencies stand ready to put thousands of people to work immediately to restore our public lands. Using funds to protect our lands, restore habitats, reduce the occurrence of wildfires and to protect homes and property, and to improve our water sources creates jobs immediately, while paying dividends well into the future. Sixty percent of the Forest Service budget is currently spent on fighting forest fires. This is unsustainable and we need to focus on thinning and fuel reduction in our forests. Forest Service and BLM road culverts need to be repaired or removed to prevent erosion and loss of salmon habitat.



I also led the Northwest delegation to secure $3.25 billion in increased borrowing authority for BPA. This will help build critical infrastructure to facilitate renewable and energy efficient projects that the BPA has planned but cannot currently build due to a lack of capital and the frozen credit markets. Under the plan, BPA is required to repay the U.S. Treasury. The increased borrowing authority will directly and immediately create 1,000 construction jobs in Oregon, a sector that has been particularly hard hit, and will eventually create tens of thousands of jobs in the renewable energy industry in the Pacific Northwest.



Many important Oregon programs that help people in dire need will get significant boosts in federal funding. For example, Oregon will receive:



o $445.3 million over two years to fund education

o $305.1 million to fund other state services to protect the state budget.

o $7.2 million for local Head Start programs in Oregon

o $33 million in the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants

o $5 million increase in the COPS program for additional police officers.

o $307 million increase in food stamp benefits which will benefit over 507,000 recipients.

o $800 million for Medicaid to provide a basic level of health services for the unemployed

o $140 million for new education construction and modernization

o $67 million for capitol repair and maintenance of the Oregon University System



Finally, H.R. 1 also boosts unemployment insurance. More than 300,000 Oregonians will see a benefit increase of $25 per week in their unemployment insurance. 52,293 Oregonians are expected to get benefits from the extended coverage.



It is my hope that the final version of the bill will include a significantly greater proportion of spending on proven job creation like infrastructure investment. I firmly believe the best way the federal government can stimulate the economy is to put Americans back to work producing real products made here in America. We need to employ Americans to refurbish and construct public buildings, roads, bridges, and schools. Restoring our depleted infrastructure puts people back to work today and provides public facilities for future generations.



The bill currently includes $30 billion for highways and bridges across the nation ($350 million for Oregon), $9 billion for transit ($85 million for Oregon), $2 billion rail ($15 million for Oregon), almost $6 billion for clean water infrastructure ($65 million for Oregon), and $14 billion for school modernization ($140 million for Oregon). These numbers sound large, but the infrastructure deficit is much larger. We can put a lot of Americans to work filling this gap and greatly improve the long-term viability of our nation. I was pleased that my amendment, to increase transit funding by $3 billion, was included in the bill. The bottom line is that infrastructure spending is good bang for the federal buck. Unfortunately, infrastructure spending was curtailed to make room for a host of other initiatives that are far less effective in stimulating the economy.



H.R. 1 is unfocused and tries to please too many people. Of the $210 billion in tax cuts, $165 billion - for businesses and individuals- will do nothing to stimulate the economy. The past eight years have proven that tax cuts do not stimulate the economy. The only thing to show for the Bush tax cuts are massive federal deficits and a major recession.



The 2008 tax rebates intended to boost consumer spending failed to stimulate the economy because most people saved that money. In the same way, President Obama's "making work pay" $500 tax credit will also fail to stimulate the economy. The federal government spent $78 billion on the tax rebates in the second quarter of last year but consumption only increased by $12 billion in response. For every dollar of tax cuts, the economy gained 15 cents. We can't continue to rely on a borrowed money consumer driven economy to work our way out this recession.



The business tax credits included in the bill have also been tried and tested, with little success. The have been recycled from the Bush Administration years and economic studies have proved their ineffectiveness. One such provision would allow a company with losses in the current year to get a refund from taxes paid in the last five years. This windfall would certainly enhance the bottom line of corporations but do nothing to actually create jobs.



Another provision accelerates the depreciation of capital improvements. Making it easier for corporations to invest with new equipment makes sense, but past experiences have shown this tax cut fails to encourage investment. Earlier this decade, accelerated depreciation was enacted to stimulate the economy but studies found that investment by the 275 of America's largest corporations fell by 15 percent. Remarkably, the 25 corporations that reported the largest tax savings from accelerated depreciation actually reduced their investment more than the other 250 corporations studied.



I believe we must act now to reverse the course of the economy, but I remain skeptical of H.R. 1. I am even more skeptical of continuing the failed Bush tax cuts. I favor spending and targeted tax cuts that will directly create jobs for Americans. If the final bill is more focused on job creation for Americans, I will enthusiastically support it.





Sincerely,

Rep. Peter DeFazio
Fourth District, OREGON

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Blah Blah. Cop Out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. save the theatrics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's a great letter which shows Rep DeFazio knows what's important and...
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 11:40 PM by Turborama
... his heart is in the right place.

Thank-you for sharing it. :fistbump:






(edit to fix typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You're most welcome
W/so many people having a less than progressive rep, I wanted to show that some reps really do care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. "he needed to vote with Obama here"
That worked out real well when the republicans voted in lockstep with bush.
The facts are that this bill isn't what Obama had envisioned, and a Congress which votes unswervingly with the President surrenders it's constitutional role as a check on the executive.
Look, the bill was passing in the House no matter which way he voted anyway and I'm glad he voted against it and then spoke on the floor as to why (thus inserting his objections in the Congressional Record for prosperity), because should this stimulus fail to deliver the republicans are going to attempt to use that failure against us. It needs to be demonstrated early and often that when the stimulus fails it's because of the changes (read "tax cuts") the republicans forced into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. HE can't change Senate rules. Should have voted for it !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. He called 'em "ephemeral tax cuts",
At first I thought he said "a femoral tax cut", which would have been as apt since we're bleeding out from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. DeFAZIO ROCKS!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rec!
Well said, DeFazio!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatInDayton Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. All these "compromises"...
and still NO Republicans on board. Unbelievable. Such cowards--covering their a$$es so they can wait and see. Probably, secretly on ship with Limbaugh, hoping it fails. They're probably already writing their blame lists. I guess they've given up on actually DOING anything. What dead weight. Such cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Go DeFazio!
Fuckin' Republicans. The Republic Party has never been interested in "givin' th' munny back to th' peepul". Where do they get off claiming this was ever so? If anything they've gotten worse- Instead of working for the top 10% as they did in the 80'2 they are now working only for the top 1%.

Wow. Reagan really was the good old days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mt13 Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. i love this man!
stickin' it to the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. And, in case you missed it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. K & R!
I wish we had a couple hundred more just like him up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Love it K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Brain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R for Pete
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 01:04 PM by Left Brain
He's the real deal. Always has been.

Must see TeeVee, thanks Turborama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. i like that guy
and i share his frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. What he said!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. He's right. The Senate rules SUCK. They need to change ! BUT, that's the way it is now, so we got
what we could out of the stimulus bill, and better to have it than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. I wish DeFazio was our rep. Tell it like it is, brother!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUnspeakable Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. BIG K&R-agree with every word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm an idiot. I SWEAR I K & R'd this yesterday, but apparently I forgot.
A belated K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC