|
There is a difference between being a sober conservative and being a right wing moron. Conservative positions are a belief in free enterprise, personal rights and the accompanying responsibilities and small government. What we have had in the last several years is crony capitalism, eroding civil liberties in the name of national security, no accounting for crimes committed in the name of national security and a belief in an overarching, dictatorial presidency with a large federal bureaucracy to support endless wars and intrusion into the private lives of individual citizens.
The right wing isn't interested in facts. A conservative believes that taxes should be low, but presented with a difficult situation, a least he will entertain the idea of raising them. In the parallel universe of the far right, a large national security state doesn't need to raise revenue to support itself and it is possible for a free enterprise system to sustain itself without paying workers to make products and expect them to be able to buy them. Now that's voodoo economics.
Of course, what really defines the right from left is that the left believes in a natural democracy in which all human beings have equal rights before the law and society while the right believes in a natural hierarchy in which some men have the right to rule over others. Slavery and imperialism are examples of right wing institutions. Racism is by definition right wing, whether it comes from Adolf Hitler or Louis Farrakahn. The ideology of neoconsevatism and modern right wing economics beliefs hold that a rich man (or nation) is successful (even if he's just inherited his wealth and doesn't know what to do with it), he is successful because he is smarter and therefore society is better off if his interests are placed above the others. If the wealthy are superior, then Dan Quayle and George W. Bush are the zenith of human evolution. Try defending that thesis.
The right, and even some conservatives, believe that wealth should not be redistributed, either by government or by labor unions, because that would just make the common people lazy and "dependent" on government. Wars are necessary to subjugate economically undeveloped but resource rich nations so that they will turn over their natural resources to those with a proven record of turning raw materials into wealth.
Far from a capitalist utopia, voodoo economics has brought us a ruinous financial meltdown. But the witchdoctor Rush Limbaugh is still there to preach to the choir and tell those who need no real facts to convince them that it's all the fault of liberals.
|