Chris Matthews and David Corn smack around Bush Iraq War shill Frank Gaffney

[Wetzelbill]

Run time: 05:08 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ2_FVCYTiE   Posted on YouTube: December 17, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: December 17, 2008 By DU Member: Wetzelbill Views on DU: 1455

 
Very good work here!

[Selatius]

1. Methinks he won't be on Matthews anytime in the near future, or perhaps ever. nt

[Wetzelbill]

4. no, he didn't look like he enjoyed that too much

lol.

[underpants]

2. 10 seconds in notice Gaffney's gesture when Mathews mentions the people's "wisdom"

that is pure neo-con Straussian philosophy exhibited by Gaffney

[Wetzelbill]

3. I saw that too

He looked like he had some serious contempt and disdain. That's what happens these guys think they are sooooo smart, when really they're just arrogant sociopaths who think "war first" on everything. To them people are stupid to not want war, to the rest of us normal people these guys are just nuts.

[spiritual_gunfighter]

5. 4000 people had to die?

Over a lie, it's just too bad it wasn't you Frank.

[Atman]

6. Great, but when will ONE SINGLE PERSON be brought up on charges?

All of these criminals will walk free, with the billions of dollars they've looted safely nestled away in offshore banks, or converted to warehouses full of gold.

Matthews shouldn't throw so many stones. Remember Chris "Codpiece" Matthews fawning over W's manly package, and swooning like a little girl over the most embarrassing, dangerous failure of president in our nation's history. Now he's all "oooh, Frank! You sold us a bill of goods!" Actually, Mr. Matthews, Frank Gaffney did his job for his bosses. Just as you are doing yours. It wasn't Frank Gaffney's job to tell you truth back then, it was your job to ask questions and investigate, not cheerlead.

Oh well. At least when Chris chooses sides, he does it with passion. He always supports the winning team.

.

[navarth]

7. ding ding ding!

CORRECT

[rurallib]

8. Gaffney brings up the chemical and biological weapons

From day 1 I was wondering what kind of crazy loony leader would send his troops directly into battle against an enemy that we had described as having this vast array of chemical and biological weapons and a leader who we characterized as more than willing to use them. (is that confusing). In other words, according to his own rhetoric, Bush was more than willing to send our troops to certain death and an agonizing death at that.
Ergo he was totally lying or totally nuts. In either case certainly not someone to follow unquestioningly.

[CitizenPatriot]

9. his justification is that they posed a "mortal threat" to America...

It's raining irony.

[bdamomma]

10. these neo cons should smacked down every chance we have.

bastards all of them. they will never accept blame or responsible for killing all those troops or Iraqi civilians we all know it was for the oil period.