Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) Says Congress Threatened with Martial Law If Bailout Bill Is Not Passed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:30 AM
Original message
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) Says Congress Threatened with Martial Law If Bailout Bill Is Not Passed
 
Run time: 00:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaG9d_4zij8
 
Posted on YouTube: October 03, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: October 03, 2008
By DU Member: kpete
Views on DU: 12304
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Holy shit. K&R
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
54. What he said!
Unreal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he just means that they weren't allowed to adjourn for the holiday without voting.
this came up on another thread a few days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No, he clearly said:
Martial law in AMERICA, not in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllHereTruth Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hmm...So should we be mad at the Bushies
Or the leaders in the house and senate?

How bout the 172 YEA votes from our own party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. all of the above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Those jerks fell under the pressure of the DLC Corporatists
You know, the ones that protect Bush, Monsanto, etc..

Too bad Granny Biden is one of them, as they have infiltrated the Obama campaign like a pack of fleas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. DLC?
You mean wkc and hrc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllHereTruth Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. Corporate America, and Corporate Politics.
As time goes on, i am sad to say, i have less and less faith that Obama can, or will, stand up to Corporate Politics.

The influence Corporate America has in our political system is astounding. I have seen only 2 men in Washington today stand up, Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders...Neither of them will to be our next president. Neither of them get national attention or recognition.

Their voices are loud...but whos listening? Not Obama. Not McCain. Not Biden. Not Palin. - Where does that leave you? Me? Your family? My Family?

That is what I am concerned about. This is what our Two Party system gives us. Corporate Dems and Corporate Repubs.

The only difference between Corporate Dems and Corporate Repubs is which Corporation backs which party. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilerbabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #44
56. You really hit the nail on the head here
My brother and I were having this very same discussion and he said something to the effect that why bother having two parties standing for the same things? This country is a mess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
60. There is only one party
The only party at this point is the Republicrat Party and the party affiliation of Republican and Democrat is merely a means to an end in terms of demographics. They will run as either depending on the demographics of a district. Time for people to wake up.

This new party had its foundation laid during the Nixon administration and if you look around in Washington, many of the faces from the Nixon administration are to be found in the Bush administrations. Clinton was the first Republicrat president. The scandals were meant merely to keep him in line. And he was kept in line. And rewarded well.

The Bush and Clinton dynasty. Coming to an unplanned end because of Barack Obama. But the Republicrats will continue on. They now control Congress. So in the end, it may not matter who is president.

I believe the congressman said what someone said to him. The sad reality is we may see martial law anyway. The economy is collapsing. It is like a row of dominoes. And too many have fallen to be able to stop the others from falling. Black Monday in 1929 just happened. There was no real warning. It will most likely happen again. Without warning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. Followed by Black Tuesday
The real crash in 1929 came the day after. Known as Black Tuesday. The day the bankers started selling everything they had invested in order to save their personal fortunes. There is a deja vu about that. Because of course the banks are the focus of this. The focus perhaps should have been on the bankers themselves. Rather than just the banks.

We are headed for bad times. Directed there by a foolish Congress. Although some would say a complicit Congress. Who like the bankers in 1929, are only concerned with saving their own fortunes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. Part of the cause of the Great Depression was deregulated banks
allowed to make risky and bad investments and being too liberal on giving credit to customers. Sound familiar?

Conservatives don't want to talk about that. Instead, they throw out that red herring called the Smoot Hawley tariff, arguing that it was the cause of the GD. Smoot-Hawley passed in June 1930--nine months after the GD started. And you have equal argument as to whether Smoot-Hawley aggravated the GD. But it clearly did not cause the GD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #27
65. Granny? Bizarre choice of words. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. What Rep. Sherman said was clearly not just about Congress
I posted this as I heard him say this live on C-Span the other day, and people tried to tell me "oh, no.
it's just about House rules" .. so I'm glad this got posted so everyone can hear exactly what he said.

"martial law in America".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #45
67. There's no way you can say that this is what he clearly said
Oh, and Congress is in America by the way. Also, even if your interpretation is correct, it's obvious that this type of martial law would be in RESPONSE to other things that happened. It's not like martial law would be declared immediately after the vote failed, which is what many on here are insinuating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. See Bush's NSPD-51
Bush's national security executive order authorizing himself to declare martial law anytime Bush thinks there is a "catastrophic emergency",
defined as ...

... "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, ECONOMY, or government functions.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've been saying for months that the only way BushCo can keep power is to impose Martial Law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You and me, both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick Of Their Lies Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Bush will do it on this date
I say he will do it on Jan 20 2009. He will Nuke Iran then decare Marshall Law. He will not allow Obama to take office,
He may do it if McCain "wins" the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
53. Army deploys combat unit in US for possible civil unrest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
143tbone Donating Member (468 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
75. Rove and Cheney are working closely with Sarah Palin
And pretty much ignoring McCain. It's pretty clear to me that that is how they're going to retain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. The panic administration.
That is one of the things that many of us do not like about this bail-out. It's just another panic. The Bush administration screams panic every time somebody stubs their toe. It's as if since 9/11 when Bush's denial of reality caused him to ignore warnings of criminal conduct that caused a lot of deaths, Bush has been running the country from one nightmare to the next.

Well, this crisis needs to be handled in a quiet, calm manner. Like 9/11, the warning signs have been there for all to see for years. The economic numbers haven't been right since Bush took office. Intervention was needed long, long ago. More regulation and tighter rules should have been applied from the beginning of this administration. Bush did not do that, and now he is running scared.

I remember my doctor in college telling me one time that he could tell he bad students from the good students because the good students get nervous symptoms at the beginning of the term. The bad students all get sick right around finals. Bush was a bad student. Elect a bad student and you get crisis management instead of good management.

Conclusion: The McCain/Palin ticket has two bad students on it. The Obama/Biden ticket? Well we know that Obama graduated magna cum laude from law school and Biden graduated from law school and would not have been able to get in had he not been a pretty good student, so they must have been good students. So, we can expect Obama/Biden to face their nervousness before crises hit them. Another reason to vote Obama/Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bush knew about for months and did nothing much like 9/11.
Then he went with his usual crisis management routine. He ran off to Congress wanting hundreds of billions of dollars or we're all dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. and they had a financial patriot act ready months ago. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
68. I find it hard to believe, but it sounds likeyou haven't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow. That's my congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heliarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
57. Mine too...
He was just on NPR and characterized the Bush administration as holding the economy ransom and not giving it back until it received 700 billion in unmarked bills.

I'm proud to be in his district today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marias23 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. WHO Threatened Marshal Law?
This is a real serious charge Who Threatened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. it's MARTIAL law
see the video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. If this is really the truth then the US government has become the enemy of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Hey, don't hold back, tell us what you really think. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. That guy nailed it drum out a good deal to not bow to pressure. Re-elect him next time Cali.
Edited on Fri Oct-03-08 05:05 PM by barack the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KewlKat Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here's why House Leadership would invoke martial Law
Article from 2006 explaining why House Leadership would invoke martial Law
<http://www.cbpp.org/7-28-06bud-stmt.htm >

House Leadership Invokes “martial Law,” Forcing Members To Vote On Key Bills Without Full Knowledge Of What They Are Voting On

SNIPPET:

Under the martial law procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation — so that Members can learn what they are being asked to vote on — are swept away. Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with tens or hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted into the legislation behind closed doors. This is the procedure that the Leadership intends to use to muscle through important bills in the next two days.

This procedure diminishes democracy. When major legislation is being considered that would add hundreds of billions of dollars to the debt or affect millions of Americans in other ways, Members of Congress should have an opportunity to study the legislation for more than a couple of hours and to know what they are voting on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. He is not talking about "martial law procedure in the house" - he said "in America"
He said that there would be martial law in America -- and he listed it after saying the stock market would drop by thousands of points on successive days - another event that would occur in America, the world outside the U.S. House.

I understand what you mean by "martial law procedure" in the house, but the Congressman is talking about martial law in the streets. You know that the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team is now on call to patrol U.S. streets...

The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.

Now they’re training for the same mission — with a twist — at home.

Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.

It is not the first time an active-duty unit has been tapped to help at home. In August 2005, for example, when Hurricane Katrina unleashed hell in Mississippi and Louisiana, several active-duty units were pulled from various posts and mobilized to those areas.


http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KewlKat Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. my appologies
I didn't watch the video before posting. I thought it was in regards to the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No apology needed - I read your post carefully and watched the video a second
time because I thought you might be the cool head that would prevail. I am startled - and at the same time not surprised - to hear that the threat of martial law was held over the heads of members of Congress. I am saddened and angry to see that they have fallen for it.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
64. And I saw posted somewhere..?
That assigning that Brigade to the "homeland" is constitutionally illegal!
Sorry no link. I am personally under such grave threat that I couldn't even sleep last night. I am 69, it was hard to find a job in my 50's, and I need to find one now to cover extra expenses, for just a normal low fuctioning lifestyle ( car, unpolluted well water)
I may have seen it on HuffPo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. Please reach out for help -- contact your local social services and find out now
about your options for getting assistance paying for heat, electricity, and food. You can keep looking for a job, but also look into your options for getting help from the government or local churches or civic organizations so that you don't make yourself sick worrying. Please.

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. This should be enough to throw that shitbag and his sidekick out of office!
I'll let you guess which one is the sidekick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. WTF did you figure when.....
Posse Comitatus ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act ) was repealed in 2006 (John Warner Defense Authorization Act 2006),
then reinstated in 2008 in a bill which Bush signed with a "signing statement" indicated that the Executive Branch did not feel
bound by the reimposed posse comitatus law.

And then this October surprize came in from armytimes.com ( http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/ )
and that's when I calmly suggested to folks that they should

FREEK OUT!!!!



DID YOU THINK THIS WAS AN AMUSING GAME?????
I dont.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. It's gone. Whatever was at that armytimes link
came in "done" but with "errors on page" -- a blank.

I'm guessing it had to do with military units just back from Iraq on some sort of stand-by alert for crowd suppression/imposition of martial law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundayparsons Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. The armytime link...
article was about the raiders...4,000 I believe was the number and they would be active duty state side effect October 1, 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Here's a good link for it: "Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #37
73. Thats it. Sorry for the bad link. Thanks for the repair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's perfectly consonant with Joe Bageant's latest article, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Joe nailed it.
Worms we be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. I would never doubt the authenticity of this. Never.
Martial Law IS their end-game. Say bye to Democracy that has outlived all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm sure glad those details were published in the media...
We are so screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. There is no democracy here, just a temporary and fading facade of one.
Fascists designed this game from way before 9/11.

What have Dems like Nancy done for us? They cozy with the Nazi-like regime in power, the one that answers to the military-corporate-elite power structure. This is what Jefferson, JFK, even Eisenhower tried to warn us about.

Way back when Jefferson told us this:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

Thomas Jefferson 1802
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. And impeachment is still off the table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Since Nancy didn't impeach these dangerous people,
she must be directly working for them. She always gives them what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. No doubt-- she's a co-criminal
aiding and abetting war-crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
58. And smiles and grins
in all the photo ops, especially the ones with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
71. Beyond that even.
I only see a familial-like admiration between them in the photos. Kind of like you might see between siblings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. I heard this on Wednesday, our elected congress persons literally had a gun held to their heads
...and were held hostage until the Bush Administration got its way. Is this what America has become?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
55. It became exactly what Bush wanted when they caved on every right stealing bill he put before them.
Now there's surprise? He said it when he was running the first time. "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

Now we have Mcfascist talking about how he always aspired to be a dictator. "If I were a dictator which I always aspired to be."

In 2000 people wrote off Wanker's ramblings as a joke and where are we now? We've got spying with no warrants, an army brigade whose job is put down "rioting" here at home. (If you think the RNC stuff was bad imagine what will happen with the Army in charge of it.) Presidential dictates that can declare martial law based on an economic emergency. Blackwater used as a private army (the blackshirts were not government employees) And now we're surprised that the threat of martial law was used to ram through a shitty bailout package? What we're becoming folks is a fascist state.

All these people who think that such dictator comments are jokes, or are funny (obviously not DU folks) would listen. McDickhead, Bush, Cheney, Palin, all of these people are telling you what they are with these jokes. Pay attention will you and listen!

I swear if we still have an election on Nov 4 these fascist idiots have got to be put to pasture otherwise it's going to be a dire time for the rest of us. And a good number of us won't survive four years on the off chance we'll get another chance to vote them off.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedLetterRev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. I immediately wrote my rep
and I'm sitting here a little numb. It's one thing to intuit what was going on. It's quite another to hear it said out loud by a member of the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. Good citizens,
we must hold a suicide watch for this man, he is obviously depressed.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #41
62. What is that supposed to mean?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FraDon Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. Martial law :: a surprise worthy of October !
Now exactly WHO was it again doing the threatening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #42
70. threatening martial law
My question too, who was doing the threatening? I don't know
which democrats to believe either. Can we find what obama has
to say on this subject? I knew there were nasty bastards out
there but this is so low! Can someone tell me who to believe?
I see Michael Moore is against this deal. But does he know
enough to see the consequences of this bill? Can the bill be
undone if necessary ? 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. K and R and bookmarked. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. Has anyone phoned Sherman's office and asked him to expand on this comment?
I'd really love to hear this.

Regardless, I hope the usual suspects at DU send this on to Keith and Rachel and ask them to investigate...

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. amen to that
he didn't specify who had been told and who told it to them.

I'd love to see KO and Rachel look into this one. I know that Thom Hartmann had Naomi Wolf on his show today and they talked quite a bit about it.

It's chilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. He won't reveal 'private' conversations. Bernie Sanders said $35 billion given in bonuses to wall st
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. About 40 extremely weathy families think they own America.The Fascist robbed our treasury
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. No expert economists allowed.Regarless of what majority of America says, it passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. The citizens should have been consulted first. Why the rush..no trusting these people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. We were powerless to stop it and powerless to take it back.Some democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstalberg Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
59. Call Blackwater Security
Blackwater Security can do the job! Call them at (252)435-2488
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
63. 9 minutes which provides insight into why this is happening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
69. And what happened the day right after the bill failed in the house
Oh the stock market went up not down! This was fear mongering at it's worse IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-05-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #69
76. And Where Have All The DU Agitators Gone Arduously Stumping For The Bailout
Inquiring minds would like to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC