Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tables are turned on (non-union) factory workers; must pay company $2 million in damages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:12 AM
Original message
Tables are turned on (non-union) factory workers; must pay company $2 million in damages

No link.

Copyright 2007 North Jersey Media Group Inc.,
All Rights Reserved

Herald News (Passaic County, NJ)
March 25, 2007 Sunday
All Editions
OUR TOWNS; Pg. B01
946 words
Tables are turned on factory workers;
Court has awarded business more than $2M in damages
By JOHN PETRICK, Special to the Herald News, North Jersey Media Group

Greg Jachts says he believes workers of the old Melard factory in Passaic who tell him about the blue dye they'd see when blowing their noses. The hearing loss they've experienced from loud machinery. The pulmonary problems they're experiencing to this day.

What he can't believe is the irony in a recent federal default judgment that orders the workers ? not the factory owner ? to pay more than $2 million in damages. The company sued the workers, claiming they banded together to fake their ailments and file fraudulent workers' compensation claims. The workers didn't put up a fight, apparently because they didn't know or understand they were being sued. As a result, the company won its case by default.

"This is an attempt to bully them from going forward," says Jachts, a court-appointed attorney representing 84 factory employees in their state workers' comp cases. "I think there's going to be a big effect. There are other employers that are going to try and do this. ... The chilling effect is there."

The workers filed their claims after being laid off from the Melard plant ? which manufactured plastic bathroom parts and packaged other items ? in 2002. In 2004, Bath Unlimited, Melard's owners, sued the workers and a law firm then representing them under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. It accused both the workers and their lawyers of conspiring to defraud the company by making false injury claims. While the lawyers settled their part of the case with the company in a sealed agreement, the workers — now without attorneys — did not respond in the federal case.

"These people are factory workers. Most of them are immigrants. Most are Hispanic. They aren't sophisticated," says Jachts, saying they simply didn't know or understand what was happening. Many of the workers, Jachts said, made around $17,000 a year. The workers didn't file any kind of legal response to the case and didn't have legal representation to do so.

As a result, U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler signed a default judgment last week against the 84 former factory workers, finding them liable to repay the company's attorneys' fees, costs, compensatory damages and workers compensation awards that two of the workers have obtained since the layoffs. The total judgment comes to $2.26 million.

In a statement reacting to the case's outcome, Masco, the Michigan-based parent company of Bath, said: "We wholeheartedly agree with the court's decision and the important principles that it underscores. The workers' compensation system, and its goal of compensating workers who suffer legitimate worker-related injuries, is far too important to be subjected to abuse and fraud."

But Jachts, a Paterson attorney, and other observers worry that the message the federal judgment sends is one that will make people with legitimate injuries afraid to file workers' comp claims, for fear of being sued.

"People are going to be hesitant to be involved in any occupational case because, quite frankly, to get sued in federal court is very expensive, even if you've done nothing wrong," Jachts says.

The state appointed Jachts to represent the workers in February 2006 because their previous lawyers — then a target in the federal case — could no longer represent them. Jachts says he will continue to litigate the remaining pending cases. The outcome of the federal suit doesn't automatically make those cases go away, but he's prepared to fight if Bath makes a motion to dismiss them in light of what's happened.

"It's possible some people don't have any injuries. But there is a mechanism for dealing with that and it shouldn't be by default and it shouldn't be in a situation where these people can't defend themselves," he says.

Because he's handling the state cases, Jachts can't get involved in the federal one. But he said there are a number of attorneys who are considering taking it over and filling a motion to dismiss the judgment. If it were to stand, Jachts says the court could place liens on workers' homes or garnish their wages to collect the money.

About 38,000 to 40,000 cases are filed annually in state Workers' Compensation Court, according to Kevin Smith, spokesman for the state Department of Labor.

The concept of suing a group of workers as a racketeering enterprise in this kind of case appears unique ? and puzzling, says Barry Cohen, managing partner of Gelman and Gelman, Wiskow and McCarthy of Elmwood Park. The law firm has handled numerous workers' comp cases over the years. Cohen noted that it isn't unusual for workers to wait until they're laid off to file claims because of fear that suing while employed could jeopardize their jobs. A large group filing claims under the same law firm is hardly conspiratorial, he says. "If a number of people come to a law firm with the same complaint, arising from the same employer, it wouldn't be unusual for the attorney to then see if others are experiencing the same disability," he says.

He and Jachts both also note that there are only a handful of doctors in the state who do workers' compensation examinations. Thus, any suggestion that people picked their own sympathetic doctors to exaggerate ailments doesn't wash, they say. The kinds of tests conducted for workers' comp claims ? such as pulmonary tests — can't be fudged, Cohen says.

"It isn't like whiplash, where you say it hurts but nothing shows up on a screen," he says.

"These people appear to be victims. They don't know the comp system well enough to commit this kind of fraud," says Cohen. As for a chilling effect locally, Cohen says there aren't many more big manufacturing plants left in the area so there's not much left to chill.
March 26, 2007

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is This A Joke?
I mean, if they sued the workers rather than each one individually, how would they collect the settlement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Little people again - I hope they can 'unscrew' this. Is this Judge
a political appointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. but of course
*Bush is the one who nominated him and I doubt any one here at DU is surprised?


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020123-19.html

The President intends to nominate Stanley E. Chesler to be a United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This needs an avalanche of publicity after getting all sides of the
story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. B/c it was a default judgment, the new atty can move to vacate the judgment
and demand a trial. This isn't the last word on this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. This can be appealed, right? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC