cnn now Gonzalas interviewed--internet porn

[rodeodance]

[rodeodance]

1. to cnn credit--she said the Outcome of new proposed law would turn

over all addresses of all people. not limited to porn.

[rodeodance]

2. IP's would be penalized if not agree.

[rodeodance]

3. noble cause (stop child porn), but I do not trust Gonzalas.

[unblock]

5. effective cover is more like it.

i don't trust ANY of 'em.

[unblock]

4. more info please? are they monitoring ALL traffic??

:scared:

[maveric]

6. I was surprised that she asked an actual hard question.

Give credit where credit is due.
This is a "What about the Children" smokescreen to allow the Govt to obtain info on internet users and regulation of the Web.

[pacalo]

7. In other words, let's make internet porn & steroids the focus

to take everyone's minds off of what really matters. We hardly ever see this creep & that's what he comes out of his hole to talk about? For starters, if adequate-paying jobs & good health care for the average American are in peril, porn won't matter anymore.

The porn we should be concerned about is what this administration is doing to this country.

[plcdude]

8. child pornography

was the subject which is totally appropriate but the * administration keeps trying to use this disgusting phenomena to access and control individuals internet activity by creating wide-ranging laws that will not pass the constitution test. They can continue to catch child porn with adequate monitoring but it will remain a moving target. Control is and always has been the neocon agenda.