Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Bush's "Free Speech" corrals legal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:15 PM
Original message
Are Bush's "Free Speech" corrals legal?
In lieu of the law that was overturned in Palm Beach, Florida today which created a safe zone around abortion clinics, wouldn't Bush's Free Speech corrals also be determined to be illegal?

Judge overturns West Palm's clinic buffer law
By Thomas Collins
Tuesday, April 18, 2006

WEST PALM BEACH — A federal judge has ruled that a city law imposing a buffer zone on abortion protesters violates free-speech rights and has ordered the city not to enforce it.

The law — enacted in October after someone set fire to the Presidential Women's Center, the last clinic in Palm Beach County where abortions are done — created a 20-foot buffer around entrances and other public areas outside health-care facilities.

U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks ruled that the city didn't prove the existence of problems that it said the law addressed: restricted patient access and a threat to public safety. Even if it had, the law is too strict, he ruled.

"Freedom of speech is rarely an issue when everyone agrees," Middlebrooks wrote. "Perhaps more than at any other place and any other time, in cases such as this, speech guaranteed by the First Amendment must be protected."

Middlebrooks ruled that the city probably would lose its case at trial, so the law cannot remain in effect until a trial takes place.



http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/local_news/epaper/2006/04/18/s1a_buffer_0418.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about the Free Speech Zone
Its good enough for those who disagree with junior. Should be good enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. No.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hate to burst your bubble,
but "free speech zones" started under Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, no you don't. Clinton never used the free speech zones the
way Bush did. Clinton wasn't afraid to face his critics the way Bush is.

And, my point is a simple one. If the free speech zones for Bush are allowed, why can't the Protest buffers be legal for abortion clinics? There should be some consistency here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I just did a Google search and can find no news story (just blogs and
forums) that verify what the gentleman in your link says. I will agree that there was such a thing at the 2004 Democratic Convention. I went to see Bill Clinton three times while he was President and never came across an area for his protestors. In fact, I actually stood side by side with a group of College Republicans protesting at one of his speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And are popular on some college campuses as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Clinton started those to protect the safety of people
exercising their constitutional rights.

Bush uses them to shield himself from "we the people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC