Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WORSE NOW than under Saddam Hussein. FACT.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:17 PM
Original message
WORSE NOW than under Saddam Hussein. FACT.
Iraqi women's plight worsens
A new poll of leaders of Iraqi women's-rights groups finds that women were treated better and their civil rights were more secure under deposed President Saddam Hussein than under the faltering and increasingly sectarian U.S.-installed government.
http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=ERBE-04-17-06

Iraq's basic services worse now than before war, GAO says
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001968744_gao30.html

Iraq Economy Worse Than Under Hussein
https://registration.ft.com/registration/barrier?referer=&location=http%3A//news.ft.com/cms/s/ecf74b6c-9f15-11da-ba48-0000779e2340.html

Better or worse? Iraqis ponder life after Saddam;
"If the percentage of the good life was one percent before, it is zero percent now,"

"Before the war, life was better because all Iraqis, including Kurds, shared the same enemy," television anchorwoman Sara Abdul Wahid, 36, from the Kurdish city of Dohuk, said of Saddam. "Now there is more than one and we can't differentiate between friend and foe."
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/COL541735.htm

Iraqis Endure Worse Conditions Than Under Saddam
http://www.health-now.org/site/article.php?menuId=14&articleId=446

Iraqis now 58 times more likely to die
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Iraq2i child malnutrition rate doubles;
Almost twice as many Iraqi children are suffering from malnutrition since the U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-03-30-un-iraq-malnutrition_x.htm

Iraq Worse Off Now Than With Saddam
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0406-01.htm

Iraq health care 'in deep crisis'
Iraq's health system is in a far worse condition than before the war.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4054105.stm

“Torture, abuses worse than under Saddam”
http://middleeastinfo.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8724

Iraqis polled: War did more harm than good
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-04/29/content_327216.htm

Human Rights Abuses Worse Now Than Under Saddam
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/03/02/fmr-un-official-human-_n_16668.html

US Occupation is Worse Than Hussein
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/us-occupation-is-worse-_b_11455.html

Iraqi women worse off under US-led occupation
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/619/619p8b.htm

Amnesty: Iraqi Women No Better Off Post-Saddam
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0222-08.htm

Iraqi standard of living worse now
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-01-25-dean-iraq-today_x.htm

We are ALL worse off now because of BUSH's war of aggression against the people of Iraq;

Terrorism threat worse in wake of Iraq war
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s1543486.htm

Iraq War Blamed for Increased Terrorist Threat
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/11107

Iraq War Increased Terror Threat: Global Poll
Most people in 33 out of 35 countries worldwide believe that the US-led invasion of Iraq has increased the threat of terrorism,
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805227.php

Iraq war may have made terror threat worse
http://www.upi.com/member/login.php

Iraq war could create a new bin Laden
http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060118-050321-6448r

US Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/26/AR2005042601623.html

United States: Losing the War on Terror
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/terrorwar/analysis/2004/aprilharder.htm

Evidence that the US May Be Losing the Global War on Terror
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1501

US: Three Years On, War on Terrorism Looks Like a Loser
http://ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=25437

”We have a stronger jihadi presence in Iraq today than in March 2003,” noted Roger Cressey, the former director for Transnational Threats in Bush's National Security Council at a briefing at the libertarian Cato Institute earlier this week.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0911-01.htm

The 'War on Terrorism': Winning or Losing? Losing.
http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/winningorlosing.htm

Terror threat to US called 'significant'
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/04/27/terror.report /

Global terror attacks triple in 2004
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0428/dailyUpdate.html

Worldwide terrorism-related deaths on the rise
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5889435%20 /

US Losing the War on Terror in Iraq; The invasion of Iraq has increased, not decreased, the threat of terrorist attack
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article2629.html

Occupation Made World Less Safe, Pro-War Institute Says
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/terrorwar/analysis/2004/0526iissreport.htm

Iraq Invasion Hurt War on Terror
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0719-10.htm

Musharraf: World more dangerous because of Iraq War
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/25/03544/7945

Blix Says Iraq War May Have Worsened Terror Threat
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0319-02.htm

Poll: Aussies, Brits, Italians say Iraq war increased terrorism
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1576/5027215.html

Iraq intervention increased threat of terrorism ("intervention"??? What exactly was being "intervened"???)
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0409/S00127.htm

UK Government; Iraq war 'increased terror threat'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3451239.stm

Iraq war has swollen ranks of al Qaeda
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1063717,00.html

US State Department Corrects Report to Show Rise in Terrorism
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5264512 /

Iraq has become a terrorist spawning ground, CIA admits
http://www.smh.com.au/news/After-Saddam/Iraq-a-terrorist-spawning-ground-CIA-admits/2005/02/17/1108609349394.html?oneclick=true

Iraq Conflict Feeds International Terror Threat
http://www.skyhen.org/Focus/iraqcoverage/cia_iraq_conflict_feeds_international_terror_threat.php

But a clear majority of Americans KNEW this would be the result; we are all LESS SAFE NOW BECAUSE OF BUSH;

62 percent thought that the threat of terror would increase if the U.S. takes military action against Iraq.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/07/opinion/meyer/main539846.shtml

"One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. If I have a chance to invade….if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency."
-george w. bush, 1999

2376.
http://icasualties.org/oif/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Awesome post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks!
Death. Destruction. WORSE than Saddam Hussein.

Way to go, bush! You're going down in history, alright.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. please add it to your journal
Thanks :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. And to the research forum! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. And this is all good news to "conservatives"
Human rights abuses, the abuse of women, torture, slaughter, mayhem, muslims suffering. All great news to "conservative" Americans. The killing of American Soldiers is of no concern to "conservatives." To die is their job and they volunteered to serve their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Humanity is of no concern to "conservatives".
No souls. No hearts.

And for sure no BRAINS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not to be seen as a advocate of this war, this is interesting
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/166.php?nid=&id=&pnt=166&lb=

Iraqis overall have a positive view of the toppling of Saddam Hussein. Asked, “Thinking about any hardships you might have suffered since the US-Britain invasion, do you personally think that ousting Saddam Hussein was worth it or not?” 77% say it was worth it, while 22% say it was not.

However, here again, the ethnic divisions are very sharp. Ninety-eight percent of Shia and 91% of Kurds say the hardships were worth it, while 83% of Sunnis say they were not.


Mind you, it just goes to show the potential for continued ethnic strife, and the hazards of going to war without considering the repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'd like to have a cross-section of Iraqi people in that poll....
...I bet a lot more people would say it wasn't worth it if they felt there would be no repurcussions for saying so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. 47% say they approve of “attacks on US-led forces"
A substantial portion of Iraqis support attacks on US led-forces, but not attacks on Iraqi government security forces or Iraqi civilians. Ethnic groups varied sharply on these questions.

Overall, 47% say they approve of “attacks on US-led forces” (23% strongly). There are huge differences between ethnic groups. An extraordinary 88% of Sunnis approve, with 77% approving strongly. Forty-one percent of Shia approve as well, but just 9% strongly. Even 16% of Kurds approve (8% strongly).


If they were under duress, why would they admit this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And so many Iraqi polls say the opposite.
"the hazards of going to war without considering the repercussions"

You mean such as using a big pile of LIES to INVADE and OCCUPY and SLAUGHTER hundreds of thousands of people in a nation that had been doing NOT ONE DAMN THING to us or to anyone else? Yeah, I guess such a "supreme crime" (Nuremburg Tribunal) as a war of aggression bush is waging against the people of Iraq would entail "hazards" and "repercussions".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush's mission was accomplished: Exec Order 13303, May 2003
Edited on Mon Apr-17-06 02:30 PM by Dr. Jones
Just after Bush declared Mission Accomplished in May of 2003, he signed Executive Order 13303 handing over Iraq's oil reserves to American companies and shielding these companes from legal prosecution in the United States.

Bush's mission was accomplished to steal Iraq's oil. He didn't care about the outcome. It's just too bad he send our troops into war for a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Send it to Holy Joe so he'll have heart palpitation and drop
out of the senate race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Where's Wolfowitz and Perle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Perle's busy being surprised about no bush statue in Baghdad;
Wolfowitz is busy licking his comb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That did leave an indelible image, his licking the comb and then
smiling about it, freakishly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. eeeesh
That was something else...

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Boy when you present your evidence
you come on strong girl. :kick: and :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Missy Lynn
Ain't no fuckin' lightweight! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. I believe "worse" is the Bush Admin goal for Iraq. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. But better for BushCo, the oil, permanent bases, and all the
corrupt pockets full of defense dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And to bushCo, that is, of course, all that matters.
Why should they bother their beautiful minds about We the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. But of course, the peons don't matter at all.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC