Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most idiotic story on gas prices EVER on ABC.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:18 PM
Original message
Most idiotic story on gas prices EVER on ABC.
They broke down by % the costs of a gallon of gas - extracting, refining, transporting, taxes, yadayadayada. Then they asked "what about profits?" - they're making *** 29% *** profits!! And they just gave they're CEO a $500 million retirement.


Oh yah - the idiot part: the phrase "price gouging" did not come up ONCE in the 5 minute story.

Evil bastards.

Corporate media indeed.

:puke: :mad: :puke: :mad: :puke: :mad: :puke: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. 29% gross margin? That not really high for retail
The problem is how much we buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Exactly!
The problem is how much we, and now the rest of the world, buy.

The only way we are going to buy less is if the price gets ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. What do retail goods have to do with anything? Oil/gas is a commodity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. We are comparing the profit contained in the retail price at the pump
That includes profit for the refiner, the distributer and the retailer. 29% isn't more than is contained in most retail products.

If you want to look at commodity markup you need to look at the profit contained in the Rack price -which will be only half as much profit on average (about 14% according to the latest senate study I could find.)

Now you can argue 14% is too much profit but that's the number we need to talk about if we want to talk commodity profits.

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:J6-1aIMGq7EJ:www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/042902gasreport/sectionv.pdf++gasoline+rack+price&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. But it's a lie. How does that square with "record profits?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. This is not retail ...

Yes, the problem is how much we buy, but the 29% figure is not the retail profit margin.

Retail profit margin is far lower than 29%. Actually, the price at the pump is typically not even calculated in terms of a percentage rather a standard, flat "cents per gallon" markup, and this changes depending on local market conditions. Some retail centers, typically independently owned convenience stores, barely make enough to pay what it costs to pump the gas, pay the various fees, and pay labor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. 29% profit for a commodity. yeah, we've got a functioning marketplace
ask any economist what the expected return for any commodity should be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Half a b---
Billion dollars? Did you say billion? Retirement?

When the mob does that, it's called racketeering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here are some number to work with
http://www.energy.ca.gov/gasoline/margins/index.html


Distribution Costs $0.03 $0.04 $0.02 $0.04 $0.05 $0.01
Crude Oil Cost $1.43 $1.42 $1.39 $1.48 $1.54 $1.59
Refinery Cost and Profits $0.47 $0.52 $0.66 $0.58 $0.59 $0.63
State and Local Sales Tax $0.18 $0.19 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.21
State Excise Tax $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18
Federal Excise Tax $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18
Retail prices $2.48 $2.53 $2.64 $2.67 $2.74 $2.81
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
46. Interesting - it looks like the refineries increase their prices each year
at about this time. It's now about 30 cents more than the beginning of the year. I suppose that could be partly due to less heating oil being needed now winter has ended, so that gasoline becomes the 'in demand' fraction of crude oil, but looking at this graphic, the amount of oil used for heating rather than transportation is fairly small, so this does look rather like "we put up American prices because we can".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Look up "cartelization"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well ok,
but here is a more pressing point:

Americans need to drive smaller cars, and drive them less often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hey, I have an idea. What about effective, efficient public transportation
systems? Nah, might have to raise billionaires' taxes for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jigarotta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. and we need to cook our hamburger well
so as not to kill our kids and elderly with hamburger disease.
it's always our fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. uh huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wages and CEO packages come out before profits are recorded, duh.
That 29% would be hugely different if the executives were gouging the companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The annual CEO compensation is about 1/10 of 1% of the profit
And a good CEO probably makes several times that much difference in profit for the shareholders so you can see why they pay him that much.

Where the shareholders get a bum deal is huge payouts when the company is losing money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So you're saying that the CEO $500 Mil added with the compensation
of the other executives is ONLY 1/10th of 1%. I am not fully in the know but somehow I doubt this is the case in these oil companies right now. But I would be interested in seeing my opinion proved wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I was talking about his annual compensation - this retirement package
sounds excessive. But since he reversed a sharp decline in company value and added $100 billion to company market cap stockholders may not complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. He brilliantly decided to raise gas prices.
No one else could have thought of it.

He deserves that half-a-billion (sarcasm).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. CEOS get rewarded or punished all the time for market forces...
Look at Internet CEOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Market forces determine if they retire with $100 million or $200 million?
Huge disparities of wealth are inconsistent with democracy.

Concentrate too much wealth, and the result is rule-of-the-rich instead of rule-of-the-people.

If it were up to me, we'd have a 100% tax rate on income above a million/year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The tried 95% in the U.K - it caused a massive recession
as the people had no incentive to be productive once they made a certain amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. The UK has a huge sales tax, called the VAT.
That causes recessions by discouraging consumption by ordinary people.

Not taxes on people paid absurd salaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. right but before that they had a 95% income tax for rich people
The beatles did a song about it The Tax Man.

" Let me tell you how it will be There one for you, nin'teen for me"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. Punished, yeah, like Kenny-Boy Lay was punished. A 50 million
dollar paycheck the year Enron folded. Some punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. The CEO answers to the
board of directors. The directors are elected by the stockholders. The stockholders with the greatest number of shares, the ones who have the most to gain or lose, has the most votes.

It is the board of directors, the ones voted in by the share holders, that determines the CEO's compensation. If you do not like what the CEO makes, take it up with the stock holders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "If you do not like what the CEO makes, take it up with the stock holders"
I agree. Thats how capitalism works. And capitalism is the worst system of economics in the world except for all the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. There is no vote in which everyone who owns stock in Exxon
gets to choose the executive compensation board.

CEOs of Fortune 500 companies sit on each other's compensation boards and divvy up the profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. The stockholders elect
the board of directors. It doesn't matter what the directors other job is they are still elected by the stock holders. In essence it is the stock holders that determine CEO pay. The stock holders with the most shares, the ones who could lose or gain the most, get the most votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. And the board of directors appoint CEOs of other companies
to the executive compensation boards, and they say that since every other big company is paying CEOs millions, ours should, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lets face it Bush could have stopped this price gouging two
years ago but his buddies and big campaign contributors wanted their pay back and they got it..John Kennedy was faced with the same delima with the steel companies and price increases and he put a stop to in a hurry and it didn't take any price controls..The Repubs could have passed a windfall profit tax bill (like the Democrats wanted) but no according to Repubs this would have hindered production and refining.......Its bull shit..Not only are these rich buddies of his making money from speculating crude oil but also unleaded gas futures..Insider trading at its best (or worst) which ever .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Higher Prices will drive innovation
It's the only way we will see a reliable alternative emerge in the marketplace.

Above all, the laws of supply and demand still rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Just what this country needs. Another laissez-faire economist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Yes people will innovate by not taking vacations
or spending less on groceries to pay for gas for their commute.

(Now a slow, long term, predictable increase in gas prices might drive conservation, but a sudden jump just takes money out of consumers pockets.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. The supply side feels the crunch as well
Edited on Sun Apr-16-06 09:03 AM by Chico Man
There are many corporations out there trying to blance a demand for higher wages with the rise of prices due to increased fuel prices. Not all corporations are experiencing windfall profits.

I cannot ignore the positive impacts that higher gas prices will have on many facets of our society. If it cuts into peoples vacation time in the short run, oh well. In the long run they will demand higher wages or decrease consumption if they really want that vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. but as the great economist Keynes said
"In the long run we shall all be dead"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. who feels the corrective effect of those higher prices?
not the industry. The people suffer while the industry benefits, unless we tax gas and oil royalties and apply the money to the implemntation and development of realistic alternatives which would offset or replace the fossil fuels.

Laws of supply and demand crush consumers. This is not a luxury market. Fuel means survival to many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. This is exactly why the first to offer a reliable alternative
Edited on Sun Apr-16-06 08:57 AM by Chico Man
Will become very, very rich.

Money motivates, and there is no such thing as a free lunch.

Gas prices are still insanely low compared to the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. that alternative will have to be supported and defended
with a solid commitment of dollars. It has to be real and comprehensive. Piecemeal is fine, progress is good, but there's no substitute for commited national policy that is determined to finally move away from fossil fuels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Then why was gas selling for more than 29% less recently
Did the costs of extracting, refining, transporting, etc. just suddenly balloon?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Lemmee guess: John Stossel is behind this
He's a true People's Champion, standing up for big bad corporate executives against the unwashed masses.

*sigh* he's my HERO :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. ROFL!! I didn't see him....
... but that don't mean he wasn't behind the scenes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
38. .
Edited on Sun Apr-16-06 08:59 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
41. The best part of the story
was the young lady who said the high gas prices were forcing her not to order dessert at the restaurant.Poor poor girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-17-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
45. Don't ya just love Democracy? yak yak yak yak yak yak
By the time anyone gets around doing anything. More people have joined the poverty ranks, if not died because of no money for health care. The rich have gotten richer. And the soccer mon's still drives like hell in the big SUVs.

And the gansters are still in charge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC