Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Leaker-in-Chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:07 PM
Original message
The Leaker-in-Chief
Is there not some chosen curse,
Some hidden thunder in the stores of heaven,
Red with uncommon wrath, to blast the man
Who owes his greatness to his country's ruin?

- Joseph Addison


"I don't know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information," said George W. Bush on September 30, 2003. "If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action."

"If someone leaked classified information," said White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan on October 7, 2003, "the President wants to know. If someone in this administration leaked classified information, they will no longer be a part of this administration, because that's not the way this White House operates, that's not the way this President expects people in his administration to conduct their business."

"I'd like to know if somebody in my White House did leak sensitive information," said Bush on October 28, 2003. On this same day, Bush said, "I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is, partially because, in all due respect to your profession, you do a very good job of protecting the leakers."

On Thursday, we found out who the leaker is.

Truthout investigative reporter Jason Leopold wrote in the first of two reports that, "Attorneys and current and former White House officials close to the investigation into the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson said Thursday that President Bush gave Vice President Dick Cheney the authorization in mid-June 2003 to disclose a portion of the highly sensitive National Intelligence Estimate to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and former New York Times reporter Judith Miller."

In the second of Leopold's reports, he writes, "Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald stated in a court filing late Wednesday in the CIA leak case that his investigators have obtained evidence during the course of the two-year-old probe that proves several White House officials conspired to discredit former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a critic of the administration's pre-war Iraq intelligence. This is the first time the special counsel has acknowledged that White House officials are alleged to have engaged in a coordinated effort to undercut the former ambassador's credibility by disseminating classified intelligence information that would have contradicted Wilson's public statements."

So there it is. We have Bush authorizing the disclosure of classified information, and we have that disclosure taking place for no other reason than to discredit an administration critic. Bush is often fond of defending his wildly inappropriate and often illegal activities by claiming that he has every right to do whatever he wants because America is "at war."

Never mind that no war has actually been declared. If we take his premise that we are in fact at war, than the disclosure of classified information for political gain must be defined simply and directly.

It is treason.

Representative Jane Harman, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, made the following statement on Thursday. "Leaking classified information to the press when you want to get your side out or silence your critics is not appropriate. The reason we classify things is to protect our sources - those who risk their lives to give us secrets. Who knows how many sources were burned by giving Libby this 'license to leak'? If I had leaked the information, I'd be in jail. Why should the President be above the law?"

"The President has the legal authority to declassify information," continued Harman, "but there are normal channels for doing so. Telling an aide to leak classified information to the New York Times is not a normal channel. A normal declassification procedure would involve going back to the originating agency, such as the CIA, and then putting out a public, declassified version of the document. I am stunned that the President won't tell the full the Intelligence Committee about the NSA program because he's allegedly concerned about leaks, when it turns out that he is the Leaker-in-Chief."

We can even take this a step further. The name of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame was all over the classified National Intelligence Estimate Bush ordered to be leaked. The pertinent text of the 1947 National Security Act reads as follows:

SEC. 601. (50 U.S.C. 421) (a) Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(b) Whoever, as a result of having authorized access to classified information, learns the identity of a covert agent and intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(c) Whoever, in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, discloses any information that identifies an individual as a covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such individual and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such individual's classified intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than three years or both.


George W. Bush and his people lied with their bare faces hanging out about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

They lied about connections between al Qaeda and the Iraqi government, lied about Iraqi connections to September 11, and further lied about the threat to America posed by Iraq.

They made a decision to invade that had nothing to do with those weapons, and even conspired with their British counterparts to goad Hussein into a war regardless of whether the weapons were there or not.

They used September 11 against the American people to frighten them into a fearfully subservient acceptance of the invasion.

They bypassed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in order to spy illegally on thousands of American citizens.

They leaked classified intelligence information in order to destroy a political foe, and in the process annihilated an intelligence network run by Valerie Plame. That network, it should be noted, was dedicated to tracking any person, nation or group that would deliver weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

Every time they broke the law, their cronies in congress manipulated those laws to make the actions taken legal.

Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians are dead. Tens of thousands more have been maimed. Millions live with the wretched deprivations caused by this war. The new Shia-dominated government wants no part of American involvement in this, and their so-called armed forces are in truth death squads masquerading as police and soldiers.

2,345 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq, with 17 of those deaths coming in the first six days of April alone. Tens of thousands more have been grievously wounded; nearly two thirds of all injuries suffered by American soldiers in Iraq are brain injuries, and amount to permanent debilitation.

We will be generations digging out from under the vomitous refuse left behind by this administration. From this day forward, any politician who claims that censure is not appropriate and impeachment is a waste of time should have their head examined by a whole team of medical experts. Bush and his people have committed treason, and did so for the lowest of reasons: personal gain and political protection.

"The dead cannot cry out for justice," said Lois McMaster Bujold. "It is a duty of the living to do so for them." So very many have died at the hands of this administration, its lies, and its crimes. If there is to be no reckoning for this, even after all this time, there will never again be a man in America who can speak of justice while keeping a straight face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Awesome Work!
Great job putting all together, bud! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. And as Guy James asked today on his show...
..."What are we going to DO about it?"

If this were the ONLY affront, the only "blemish," the only ATROCITY in the Bush White House, it would be DAMNING...

...but it's not.

And today, Junior got to do victory laps over his guest worker program...Vicente Fox presented a list of demands, and Bush delivered them ALL.

SO...other than continuing to hand Bush EVERYTHING HE WANTS, "What are we going to DO about it?" I appreciate your post, but with a Republican majority in the House and Senate, how does this translate into justice?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've said it before, I'll say it again...
The Bush Family plot will have to be unmarked because of the amount of human stool and urine left upon it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Cheney's too:


Would you look at that line?!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. It never ceases to amaze me...
...how quickly you put one of these pieces together. Excellent work and I'm sure will be emailed like crazy tomorrow. Bravo! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. "vomitous refuse" -- Wow! an utterly perfect description. Best paragraph:
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 08:28 PM by BigBearJohn
We will be generations digging out from under the vomitous refuse left behind by this administration. From this day forward,

any politician who claims that censure is not appropriate and impeachment is a waste of time should have their head examined by a whole team of medical experts

. Bush and his people have committed treason, and did so for the lowest of reasons: personal gain and political protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. not to be pessimistic
and I did feel today a major "gotchya" moment , I am still loathed to feel the apologist Gonzales' grip on controling the judiciary. That coupled with the stranglehold on the legislature.

Do we have any recourse anyway? With the voting machines and all?

I just feel that redemption won't happen through traditional or linear ways exclusively alone. That's why I've been writing my ass off every day since November. Will continue doing so.

best to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scylla and Charybdis.
He is now caught between the political consequences of being a proven liar, and the criminal consequences of having been untruthful in his testimony to the special counsel.


It's just a matter of time now.

Thanks for another great piece, at this pivotal moment, Will.

:thumbup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jane Harman is very has a very cautious and subdued style
this is pretty big for her to say this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Congressperson Harman must have got the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. very cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. uncommon wrath - that is good n/t
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. kr........ very good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Will, if opportunism never worked for you before, it certainly will now.
hump all over that open ho and spread it around.

x( sorry for being so crude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent!
Says it all. "Vomitous refuse left behind." Shew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Jane Harman is my congressperson
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good look-up on the United States Code
I want the NIE with Valerie Plames-Wilson's name on it. I can't find it anywhere. I want the President gone (mainly because he has authorized torture), but proof needs to be forwarded. I think the President would be a goner by now if her name had been on the pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Excellent work, Will.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Great as always, Mr. Pitt and a question to anyone.....
I just got up and my head is full of all I heard, saw and read yesterday. Forgive me if this 53 year old sounds naive this morning.......

Is this it?
Will this sorry excuse of an administration who has (almost) ruined our country and gotten away with all manner of crimes here, Iraq and elsewhere be held accountable?
Do we dare hope to see America as she was "pre-Bush" and hope she can be better for it due to lessons learned?
Can we overcome the current attitude of the world about us and once again be citizens of this world who offer a helping hand to less fortunates, not feared and hated as invaders and liars?

So much good has been undone, so much more needs to be fixed.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. William Rivers Pitt: "Bush and his people have committed treason, and ...
... did so for the lowest of reasons: personal gain and political protection.

"The dead cannot cry out for justice," said Lois McMaster Bujold. "It is a duty of the living to do so for them." So very many have died at the hands of this administration, its lies, and its crimes. If there is to be no reckoning for this, even after all this time, there will never again be a man in America who can speak of justice while keeping a straight face.

Link:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040706J.shtml


Your The Leaker-in-Chief is the best of everything I've read written by you, Mr. Pitt.


Always Remember My Fellow Americans: "The President of the United States willfully violated National Security to cover-up his willful launch of a war of aggression."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Great read - am bookmarking n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. Link to final
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let me play Devil's advocate
1. Bush did not order the leak of sensitive classified information. He declassified it first, then ordered it leaked.

2. The United States Constitution (link:www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A3Sec3.html|Article 3, Section 3]) defines only one crime, Treason:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

It would seem that under this definition, for one to be guilty of treason, one should be collaborating with the enemy (in this case, al Qaida). Yet I know of no one in the junta who collaborated with al Qaida. Therefore, reserving judgment of the legality for unmasking Ms. Plame, it was not treason.

I'm putting these forward in anticipation of right wing talking points. Look for a memo from Ken Mehlman soon.

Now, evil DUers, pick them apart. Red meat. Go for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. " He declassified it first, then ordered it leaked"
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 05:38 PM by Warren Stupidity
Then the executive office can produce the appropriately dated Declassification Guide that will establish that the NIE was first declassified and then leaked. Or not, in which case everyone involved should be trying on orange jumpsuits.

Oh - also I agree it isn't treason. However fraudulently taking the nation to war certainly qualifies as a high crime and misdemeanor.

Henry Waxman lays out the case:
"http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040706Z.shtml"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. If I followed the WH press briefing correctly yesterday,
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 11:17 AM by in_cog_ni_to
the documents were leaked FIRST and THEN the declassifying came weeks later...to cover their asses, I suspect. I THINK that was what the reporters were saying yesterday and Snotty said he would have to look up exactly when they were declassified...he couldn't remember.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Beelzeshrub is Gawd's chosen bullshitter...
sent to rule the fools!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. "I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is,..."
Liar.
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I think * needs a few of these.


Apparently Luvs are guaranteed to stop leaks. If * has been using them all this time, then he'd better ask for a refund.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. Exactly.
Bush said, "I have no idea whether we'll find out who the leaker is, partially because, in all due respect to your profession, you do a very good job of protecting the leakers."

I think he felt he could get away with it because the press doesn't reveal it's sources and he could always claim that he declassified it.

We are back to "It's not the crime, it's the cover up." Maybe everything done was done in the correct order and there is no crime to be prosecuted.

Still, he lied to the public when he pretended to not know the leaker. The population doesn't like to be lied to. Maybe some of the sheeple will wake up on this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. Looks like they underestimated Mr. Fitzgerald.
He got right to the bottom of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. sounds like he's been at the bottom of it for almost two years
patiently excavating the foundation out from under them. I do believe he'll make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is the reason....
you write and I read.

Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. From Incompetent President to Incontinent President in 72 hours.
Tear him up Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. you just made my bladder gladder ... oh, that's a very good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. Well put, and whether we're at war or not, they have waged war on America
on the rule of law, on our Constitution, on the integrity of our intelligence and military, on our ability to have credible, orderly government.

Boy, Jane Harman must really be pissed:

Representative Jane Harman, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, made the following statement on Thursday. "Leaking classified information to the press when you want to get your side out or silence your critics is not appropriate. The reason we classify things is to protect our sources - those who risk their lives to give us secrets. Who knows how many sources were burned by giving Libby this 'license to leak'? If I had leaked the information, I'd be in jail. Why should the President be above the law?"

"The President has the legal authority to declassify information," continued Harman, "but there are normal channels for doing so. Telling an aide to leak classified information to the New York Times is not a normal channel. A normal declassification procedure would involve going back to the originating agency, such as the CIA, and then putting out a public, declassified version of the document. I am stunned that the President won't tell the full the Intelligence Committee about the NSA program because he's allegedly concerned about leaks, when it turns out that he is the Leaker-in-Chief."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkham House Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. God bless you, Will
No one has spoken truth to power more consistently and fearlessly over these past five years in the wasteland than you. This is one of your finest pieces. I cannot believe--literally, I *cannot* believe, despite everything--that we could have a US President sink this low, then just lie about it so blithely. Anything about this man, about this regime, is believable, LIHOP, MIHOP, anything. We'll be spending decades figuring all this out, but we know one thing: this "administration" is the greatest disgrace in our national history, bar none...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. Excellent
Good to see a good Pitt article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Never Forget Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
35. The time is now.
This is it. I just know it. Bush and his band of merry thieves are finally going to get what's coming to them. Next week should be very interesting indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Fabulous Quotation!
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 01:33 PM by Demeter
so apropos!


Here's another Addison Quote (look him up, folks, he's a Founding Father's founding father!)

"No oppression is so heavy or lasting as that which is inflicted by the perversion and exorbitance of legal authority. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
40. Plame's name was in the NIE?
We can even take this a step further. The name of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame was all over the classified National Intelligence Estimate Bush ordered to be leaked.

I haven't read this anywhere else. Am I just hopelessly behind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I think this may be an unsubstantiated claim
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 07:53 PM by worldgonekrazy
Levey says in this thread you linked to that Plame's name was in the NIE. But he doesn't provide anything to back that up and I haven't seen that claim anywhere else.

And, even if Plame's name was in the NIE, it has also not been established that it was in the selective portions that were actually leaked.

Sorry to be a stickler, but this is an important point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
44. I have always agreed with this premise
Is there not some chosen curse,
Some hidden thunder in the stores of heaven,
Red with uncommon wrath, to blast the man
Who owes his greatness to his country's ruin?

Always..

A country can not be torn in two but must be mended. If left to good people it will find a way to resolve itself.

I would like to count myself among them.

Long week much accomplished much learned


I have indeed been on a tall ship in Boston Harbor, it was a beautiful view of the city.
Which reminds me me of inland sailer I had.

It was a 28 foot E scow a beautiful thing, Melgas 417. In a transition to the modern age, this was the scow Buddy Melgas made his first Fiberglass cast form (or so is the scuttlebutt). Fiberglas made a much faster ship, less drag. She was wood ship fast and true and could point in the wind like nobody's business. I could never find a crew to sale her with ( takes at least three, one to run the boards one to work the jib and a skipper. so I sold it for what I paid for it 700.00 dollars was the figure. There are so many things in life we regret doing which can not be returned to only learned from.

I'd like to come back to Boston to your port of call some day and buy you a beer and perhaps you could buy me one too. Bolski's looks like a good Tavern, I think I'd fit in.

ASS-whole,

A mellower,
Mark

and the kittie's say hello.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
45. I have always agreed with this premise
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 11:34 AM by btmlndfrmr
Is there not some chosen curse,
Some hidden thunder in the stores of heaven,
Red with uncommon wrath, to blast the man
Who owes his greatness to his country's ruin?

Always..

A country can not be torn in two but must be mended. If left to good people it will find a way to resolve itself.



I have indeed been on a tall ship in Boston Harbor, it was a beautiful view of the city.
Which reminds me me of inland sailer I had.

It was a 28 foot E scow a beautiful thing, Melgas 417. In a transition to the modern age, this was the scow Buddy Melgas made his first Fiberglass cast form (or so is the scuttlebutt). Fiberglas made a much faster ship, less drag. She was wood ship fast and true and could point in the wind like nobody's business. I could never find a crew to sale her with ( takes at least three, one to run the boards one to work the jib and a skipper. so I sold it for what I paid for it 700.00 dollars was the figure. There are so many things in life we regret doing which can not be returned to only learned from.

I'd like to come back to Boston to your port of call some day and buy you a beer. Bolski's looks like a good Tavern.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC