Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Censure Hearing Thread # 8- Judiciary Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:22 AM
Original message
Official Censure Hearing Thread # 8- Judiciary Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Specter beating up on the witness, but sucking up to Turner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Turner- Al Capone example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is SOOOOO pre-9/11 thinking! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. what happened to Specter
He was "upset" about this whole program but now hes its #1 defender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Spectre got a visit from Dr. Doom, I'm sure.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe Rove decided to join the gallery. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. honestly, I don't think he likes Feingold, personally.
He has a little sneer in his voice when he speaks of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yes, and he loses no opportunity to snipe at him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. or fears him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Blackmail. He was probably wiretapped and the info obtained from
the wiretap was used to blackmail him. IMCPO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. I just can't STAND it- I WANT THE NSA PROGRAM INVESTIGATED
I want the point of WILL WE ALLOW THIS AND WHAT HAPPENS TO THE DATA AFTER THEY COLLECT IT to be answered, demmit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. hopefully a year from now, it will
Win in November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Turner "its the target that matters"
"I'm told that there is new technology that makes it hard to do FISA."

So FIX FISA - like you couldn't go back and do that. Please. Its been YEARS since 9/11 and Bush has repeatedly INSISTED that he was getting warrants since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. And that's the point- he LIED about getting warrants-if it wasn't
possible to use FISA to do the kind of fishing expedition he was doing, he should have stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. exactly - after 9/11 everyone was so spooked they would have
changed it to be whatever Bush wanted it to be.

This adminstration LIED when they said it didn't need to be fixed, and LIED when they said they were getting warrants. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Original message
What is he talking about????
He's so lying!!! There IS NO delay!!! They can go back and get a warrant you ASS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Makes you wonder who they were between 2003 and Nov 04. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. but he has insisted that those warrants were through the
Patriot Act not because of FISA. They are trying to make it seem that one is different than the other. They are not, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. I would LOVE to find out what steps, and how much effort it
REALLY takes to get a FISA WARRANT! The objectors always make it sound like it's SUCH a burdensome task, it's impossible to use, and the supporters make very light of the requirements.

Is there ANYWHERE we can get the TRUTH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thorandmjolnir Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Original message
The man is an idiot.
"There are people trying to kill us" and "it to cumbersome".

Well, there are people the US, righht now, who are trying to kill other americans (they are called criminals), but we cant spy on them without a court order!

This is BS. This whole National Security crap is a ruse for dictatorial power grab.

Who in their right mind think that a group of people halfway around the world can ever threaten the NATIONAL SECURITY of the United States?

The Soviet Union could do it, but only because on massive nuclear weapons.

Even 9-11 was not a threat to national security. All essential functions of government remained intact and there was NO INVASION.

Absolutely BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wish someone would tell Spector to shut up!
He's talking more than the witnesses. Arrrghhh... I can't stand him!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Feinstein's office number is busy, busy, busy
Either they are getting a boat-load of calls or they took the phone off the hook... All the other calls were busy, they would answer would you hold please, so I know people are calling....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. GOOD!
I hope they're getting slammed by constituents for shirking their duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Keep calling the AWOL Dems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is about all I can stand.
We can't possibly be living in a society that is OK with widespread wiretapping because of fear of some invisible enemy. We can't possibly be that far gone, can we?

:cry: :cry: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. We need to send a strong message to our Democratic
leaders who should of been sitting in session on this panel.... A strong message....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. we are definately there
We attacked a defenseless country because of the same boogieman fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Yes. We can.
They've managed to pick out the piece that makes it okay, and dismiss the rest because the first is in the interest of 'national security'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Turner, the Pres. already has Task Force 121 (now renumbered)
What civilian control of the military is there ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
23. Graham up- after Fein... "This crowd in the White House really believes
this stuff. Will you give them credit for believing what they believe?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. It isn't a matter of CREDIT, ass. The people that believe this are INSANE
my comment, not on the tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. They believe they can lie and they believe they can break the law
so it must be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
53. belief is a conviction unsupported by facts
there is nothing sacred or even evidential about "belief"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LilyLibber Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. Am I wrong here...
or do the existing FISA laws have a provision that if something requires "immediate action," that the NSA could START the wiretaps immediately and had a 30 day "grace period" to get all the approvals? If that's true, his argument is a steaming load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Welcome to DU and it is a load n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Not 30 days, but 72 hours. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LilyLibber Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #42
80. Thanks! I heard the 30-day thing...
on an NPR report a month or so ago, so I can't verify that. Even so, the FISA folks do nothing BUT this, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #80
93. As far as I know that's right.
It's not the complaint that FISA judges are too slow, but that it's too much work for the AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
31. Lindsey Graham is an ASSHOLE of huge proportions
He is not behaving as a Senator.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Original message
Lindsey Graham is an IDIOT. Reviewing history w/Dean
is playing with fire. The Ellsberg break in was done for NATIONAL SECURITY reasons by Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
68. Graham doesn't mention the AUMFs are based upon LIES
in order to give Bush authority to do whatever he wants. War Powers Act of '73 requires 'clarity' and truthful circumstances and situations. Both AUMFs embed the WPAof'73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
33. call these AWOL DEMS NOW.
-31-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
42. Call & ask where our Dems are! phone #s:
Fri Mar
Joe Biden
202-224-5042
state: Wilmington 302-573-6345
state: Milford 302-424-8090

DiFi corrected by a poster (difi is 202-224-3841)
202-22403841
state: LA 310-914-7300
state: San Diego 619-231-9712
state: San Fran 415-393-0707
state: Fresno 559-485-7430

Dick Durbin
202-224-2152
State: springfield 217-492-4062
state: chicago 312-353-4952
state: marion 618-998-8812

Ted Kennedy
202-224-4543
state: boston 617-565-3170

Chuckie
202-224-6542
state: nyc 212-486-4430
state: buffalo 716-846-4111
state: albany 518-431-4070
state: binghamton: 607-772-6792
state: hudson valley 914-285-9741
state: long island 631-753-0978
state: rochester 585-263-5866
state: syracuse 315-423-5471

GO!

Qs: 'Why isn't the Senator attending today's meeting of the Judiciary Committee?"
"Why not?"
"Doesn't he think the testimony important?"
"Doesn't he think the issue worth debating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. the new meme is "robust authority"?
Like a good cup of coffee - "robust flavor"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
36. Kennedy is MIA!!!!!!!!! His office says that "He has had a busy week"
Fuck this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #36
67. Apparently they've changed their answer then
Another poster said his office answered that "Not all Democrats (or Senators?) agree with Senator Feingold". Never mind it's their DUTY to be there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #36
73. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
37. Graham is badgering Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yes he is! What a dick! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. He sure as hell is.
What a bunch of slimy rat bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
38. "you are showing that you don't know that subject very well."
Dean on the closet case.

Ha ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
39. Shut Up Lindsey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
41. Graham doing his Perry Mason tactics
The Prosecutor in Perry Mason shows anyway. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. Graham revisiting Watergate? WTF?nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Original message
The plan is to attack John Dean's credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
49. it appears that way n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SujiwanKenobee Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
44. Idiot Graham playing on the word "Belief" as though this is some kind of
religious revival of opposing denominations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #44
59. As if "belief" is evidence of legality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Original message
So the lesson learned:--If Pres. really really believes in his actions as
doing good. all is well. what a bunch of illogical crapola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
45. te he Dean tell Grahm he does not know his history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. .
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
48. geez, is graham on crack? n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
50. Verbal fistacuffs
Someone go smack Lindsay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
51. Leahy is trying to shut Graham up.
Graham is a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
52. Leahy wants to talk but Sp. says Dean defending himself well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. If this was a court room, Graham would have been shut down for badgering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
54. Oh. Oh. Oh. Now this is good.
He covered it up for national security reasons.

no, he covered up to cover his ass.

UM HOW DO YOU KNOW THE PRES ISN'T DOING THE SAME THING you fucking MORON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. Ummm, Because Bush is a 'good man and a good Christian'?
Just guessing here. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #54
64. Dean should have asked him
if he was trying to make the arguement that because Nixon did it, then B*sh can to?

idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
55. Gramm is badgering the witness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
57. Graham would rather talk about Nixon
instead of wire-tapping of American citizens without a warrant... Does not anyone beside Leahy and Feingold care about the people????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. No. nobody does.
I better write my will because one of these days I will be disappeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
58. Lindsey Graham is an asshole. He's actually defending this bullshit
because the people in the WH believe that what they're doing is RIGHT! What they're doing is OK because they think it's OK? Is that REALLY what he's saying? It's OK because the WH thinks it has all the power to do ANYTHING it wants to do? WTF????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Charles Manson BELIEVED that he was right, too!
What a crock of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #65
90. So did Hitler, the Klan, etc., etc., etc. bastard fuckers!!
A huge steaming crock of shit fooj!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #58
70. Graham is a complete asshole.
Immature asswipe should be chasing ambulances in South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #58
86. Supposed to be okay
because Nixon was a crook. Yeah that makes sense. In the outer limits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
62. This is going to get NASTY. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
63. Graham, that bully, does not want answers
He is a coward and a bully, too bad he can make himself look reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thorandmjolnir Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
75. Please read up on this little A-hole
And what he has done in the Detainee Treatment Act. Falsyfying statement to the Supreme Court. Coordinating with the DOJ about the whole isse.

He is despicable.

Glad to see Dean hand him his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Original message
"Inherent authority vs. plenary authority"-- Leahy
Important issue here on regulating power of Pres !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
66. Leahy the ONLY other Dem there?
Is that true?

Sen. Leahy is the ONLY other Democrat at this committee hearing?

Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #66
74. Ranking member
But at least he's doing his duty...unlike the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #66
89. Sen Kohl is there (at least I saw him earlier)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
69. Was Graham's last statement odd to anyone ??????
Edited on Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM by stop the bleeding
doesn't agree with the WH but does not doubt that they meant well - WTF is that suppose to mean??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Original message
everything he said was all emotion and conjecture
and no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #69
79. Faith based government
Especially when the Exec Branch is controlled by your party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #69
82. I missed it...was reading the thread. What did he say? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #69
84. Graham is rocking in his chair violently...
Like a little brat throwing a hissy fit... He was bitch slpped by Dean and he didn't like it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #84
87. He came unglued during that exchange n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #69
85. GO AHEAD SENATOR LEAHY
HE IS PISSED. THESE DEMS SENS ARE RUNNING SCARED, NOT ONLY THE REPUBS, IT IS OUR TIME TO CALL THESE SENATORS AND GIVE IT TO THEM, AND TAKE US SERIOUSLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
71. >>>>>> THREAD NINE - >>>>>>>> LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
72. Leahy said I am not concerned about the next election
Good man......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
76. Bottom line.Dean's testimony is ALL OVER THE WIRES...
Take that one to the bank you lying mofo's..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
77. Why didn't Graham bring Alito's wife, so she can do some crying
because the Dem's are so mean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #77
83. ROFL!
:thumbsup:

Perry Mason Prosecutor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
78. Leahy--no one is above the law, even the president. yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
81. Dean just made Graham look stupid
for misspeaking about what happened at Watergate. Graham blew into the room, bullied the witnesses, and got egg on his face.

Leahy: I am not concerned about the next election - I have 5 years until my next election. I am concerned about the Constititution.

I LOVE Leahy. At least he is there, and swinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #81
94. given Grahm's behavior today, it did not take much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
88. Graham Feverishly Rocking In His Chair -
nervous Senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #88
92. Graham doesn't know his history.
He is too young to remember. It is worse than just looking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #88
95. LEAHY IS LEAVING WHO DOES THAT LEAVE
JUST FEINGOLD, WHAT A BUNCH OF SHIT, AGAINST THOSE BROWN NOSES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
91. Dean: history is repeating itself because there is no check
as there has been in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. Leahy said he had to leave:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
97. Why does Hatch hate democracy?
n/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
98. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC