Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official NSA Spy Hearing Thread # 4

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:55 AM
Original message
Official NSA Spy Hearing Thread # 4
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 11:56 AM by liveoaktx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Spector is the only Senator present?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wish Feingold was there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I just love to look at him
aren't I a bad girl? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Specter is interrupting this guy which is so rude
This guy is fighting back. Thank god for CAFP :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Is Spector going to let this witness be a witness
or will he keep flapping his jaws????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Halperin/Specter- Taking AG certification?
No, Administration must inform fully what program is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. ohhh...conflict from the get-go!
They keep talking about "the program". Let's talk about spying without a warrant. (period emphasized)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Halperin- President cannot do survill UNLESS he goes to FISA
to get a warrant first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Halperin- Govt would argue that Congress has authorized this new
program IF it meets the standard in your legislation ... by its wording.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Specter said this part was going to be short
Looks like he's shutting it down from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Halperin going over the fine points of his bill- AG needs to certify
how relevant the people being spied on are, which looks like authorization of NSA spying program
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Specter is Mr. Interruption all of a sudden.
I wish he had cut off some of those bloviating judges when they were putting me to sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. where are you guys watching this??
i have c-span and c-span 2 -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. CSPAN 3 live feed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Online link.......... Here it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:07 PM
Original message
Thanks for the link, what is Time Warner CEO doing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:17 PM
Original message
From what I understand
they use some type of communications involving TW in wiretapping???? Maybe someone can enlighten further....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. cspan 3 streaming video Real player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tying in the Hamdan case. very relevant point
By Congress providing for judicial review of a program, the gov't argues, Congress is implicitly authorizing that program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. someone saying Specter bill actually authorizing the new PROGRAM
but Specter is dismissing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Interesting isn't it? Is he trying to sneak this by the public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:02 PM
Original message
Undoubtedly, and the Hamdan case will have a big impact on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. well, if he is, the public now knows, but who in power will notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Well, those of us watching on Cspan... and not just on Cspan but on
the computer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Halp. Focus on what the AG has presented-WHY IS FISA NOT SUFFICIENT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. If it's a time issue, give him additional time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:04 PM
Original message
Halp. Telephone companies wanted clear guidance (FISA)
otherwise FBI, NSA, etc in jeopardy of civil liberty violations and you also get LEAKS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Hal. is basically saying what Kennedy said earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Important point about WHY the people leaked, because they
believed the President was illegally spying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. The initial reason we got FISA is that a Pres. was illegally spying. GOT
IT. Mr. Specter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Looks like Biden's up next
Hope he asks concise questions.

Please, Joe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Pray for brevity :grin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Have to leave for work. Will check the threads later
I hope they replay this later too.

thanks for taking notes for those of us that can't be here ...

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. bai sydnie
:hi: take care :hi:
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. KRIS- (Telecomm) believes NSA program violates the law!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Kris(Time Warner) Consider legislation to authorize and regulate NSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh! Surprise! Time Warner guy testifying as an individual - on our side!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. My jaw hit the floor!
Constitutional crisis; Pres broke law; spying unconstitutional...

:wow: :wow: :wow: :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. wish I could see his legislation. can't wait to see the details.
And remember, this is a corporate dude. He likely has M-O-N-E-Y.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Time-Warner's bank account is not ambulance chaser level. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wow! That Time-Warner guy sure has some hefty connections
from past government positions.

But wow oh wow!!! He says Pres broke the law and what we're looking at is a Constitutional crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. Witness sees this as a 'constitutional moment"--the separation of powers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I'm pleasantly surprised- wish he'd talk about the technical issues
of this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. will be interesting to see how Senators respond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. this is AMAZING!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Surprised and amazed Specter hasn't cut him off yet.
Oh, but he's throwing kisses to Specter on his bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Somebody tell me -are their TWO bills? Specter's and Dewine's?
Seems to me that Specter doesn't like the congressional oversight to intell committee that Dewine Hatch propose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. I'm still trying to catch up on the "advisory opinion" that
Specter keeps referring to. "Advisory" warrants? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. Apparently there are two
They keep talking about "the other bill".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. I know what Dewine's TRAVESTy seeks to do which is to have
Congress do oversight of the program instead of sending it to a court... only if the INtel committee (and possibly others) decide to forward it IF they think someone has been spied upon wrongly, would it then go to a court. Specter is against this.

So it appears that, despite newspaper accounts, Congress has NOT agreed upon Dewine's bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. Kris- Specter's bill specific and concrete vehicle for extended debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. 'extended debate" is key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
46. Just tuned in for a minute; why isn't something of this
much importance being aired on CSPAN 1 or 2? Jeeze... priorities...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Republicans control the cameras
Not sure if they also control the programming, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. I imagine it will be played again tonight on regular tv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. I think cspan has a contractural obligation to cover the House &
Senate while they are in session, so 1 & 2 are committed. I suspect you might see this hearing reaired on one of them either tonight or later in the week. They do that a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. Specter-Congress would authorize FISA to review Bush's program
not authorizing the program per se, not about to authorize it, don't know what it is. IMO not the function of the Intel subcommittee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
52. Biden to Specter..."Keep going!"
Hunh! That's a first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
53. Biden won't let Specter weasel out of difficult position
Mahahaha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
55. Going to make a 5th thread-link in a moment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
56. Good start, Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
57. Halperin has isolated the issue perfectly
Regardless of what legislation is passed: if the President argues he has powers above and beyond it, it is useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. Biden: thinks Intel Committee should be censured. thinks Congress
is not doing its job and is retreating from the "battlefield" and not holding admin to oversight despite its utter lack of credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
60. Locking
Please continue in thread 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC