Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN Breaking 3:36 - Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss Censure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:47 PM
Original message
CNN Breaking 3:36 - Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss Censure
they are going to investigate the Feingold's resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Judiciary ummmmm.. Isn't that Roberts?? I think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. that's Specter, Roberts is Intel Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Specter
...is the chair of the judiciary committee. His history tells me he would be the most likely to investigate the issue. To what length of course, remains a mystery...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. *** Here is who is on the committee: ***
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 03:52 PM by FLDem5
http://judiciary.senate.gov/members.cfm

Arlen Specter - CHAIRMAN, PENNSYLVANIA

Orrin G. Hatch UTAH

Patrick J. Leahy - RANKING DEMOCRATIC MEMBER, VERMONT
Charles E. Grassley - IOWA
Edward M. Kennedy - MASSACHUSETTS
Jon Kyl - ARIZONA
Joseph R. Biden, Jr. - DELAWARE
Mike DeWine - OHIO
Herbert Kohl - WISCONSIN
Jeff Sessions - ALABAMA
Dianne Feinstein - CALIFORNIA
Lindsey Graham - SOUTH CAROLINA
Russell D. Feingold - WISCONSIN
John Cornyn - TEXAS
Charles E. Schumer - NEW YORK
Sam Brownback - KANSAS
Richard J. Durbin - ILLINOIS
Tom Coburn - OKLAHOMA








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If there is a vote to consider censure...
And Specter is in favor of it, what Republican is most likely to break the tie for the Censure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. As anyone watched the John Roberts/Scalito hearings will tell you
The Judiciary Committee Republicans are the biggest ass-kissin Shrub-lovers in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Lindsey Graham
...seemed to become swayed by the wiretapping forums and if there were a vote to start investigations, he would have went for it. As I understand, he was quite slandered during the 2000 primaries that recently, he really isn't the biggest fan of the president. Not as much as most pubs are at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. I agree about the butt kissing, But!
Specter is pissed at the WH. This might just work, and we may get the investigation we wanted. I'm staying optimistic about this one, for some reason i believe Specter wants to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. From the look of this mess of Repubs, NONE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Biden?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. thanks, Russ Feingold is a member. yippe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Coburn, Brownback, Cornyn. Whackjob alert. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not Roberts
Specter, not that it makes a big difference. Both are lapdogs for Bush!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. sorry, my mistake, Roberts/Rockerfeller are the Intell committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing on the AP yet - anyone hear anything else??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. MSNBC; to take place next Friday. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
56. It's not on the Committee schedule yet... but this is....
Tuesday, Mar. 28, 2006

9:30 a.m.
Judiciary
To resume hearings to examine war time executive
power and the FISA Court.
SH-219

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't Cantwell on that committee?
I plagued her over the censure. Maybe she'll be supportive? I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. see post 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Thanks
What a cast of characters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting.
Hmmm...is this something that Specter wants to sweep under the rug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. to get a grasp on the Judiciary Committee - think about
the Supreme Court hearings before the vote went to the floor for debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He's been very vocal lately
...about the wiretapping issue. He hasn't really done much, but this action certainly is encouraging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. KO said that Specter's been "drinking truth serum by the gallon"
Or something like that, I'm not sure of the exact wording, but I know that I sat up a little straighter and thought "Oh, goodie."

I thought it was a very encouraging comment from somebody who pays attention to the news for a living. I'd thought of Specter as being a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing--making outraged noises and then pooping out when it came down to taking real action about wiretapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Specter'sbeen using some very unflattering descriptions of the Admin
...after Gonzalez had spoken to them, he said the Bush Administration was "smoking Dutch clenser." What makes me wonder is who's really smoking the dutch cleanser if it's clear the president broke the law and the chariman of the judiciary comittee doesn't do anything. Quite frankly I believe that if Specter does something too drastic, his colleagues will smear the crap out of him and he will soon lose his chairmanship. It's possible that his very slow, gradual progression could lead to somethign big. Either that or he's just having too much fun with his dutch cleanser and friends.

Let's hope latter's wrong...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Specter is old, sick and dying - this will be his legacy - do the right
thing or do a cover up - this is the only thing that he'll be remembered for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I think you're right
Hecertainly has morality on his side this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. Specter's job is to make it all go away.
He's already held hearings on the spying, and they were literally nothing more than a collective fraud.

Specter's star witness, Chimp Gonzales, agreed only to testify about things that could arguably linked to al Qaeda. So, whenever he was asked about the crimes committed by Chimp Bush, he said, without saying, "That's a whole different program. I ain't talking 'bout that."

Specter is an enemy of this country. He will hopefully die in prison, with the Chimp people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. This has got to be a scam
someone post what it is when it gets figured out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I thought they would let this die a slow death
one of two things are moving this forward:

1. Frist and Co. have decided they want a fast vote to get votes on record to embarass Feingold and the Democrats because they have discovered the votes are few.

2. They truly want to have a conversation about this to help distance themselves from Bush.

..I think #1 is more likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. #1
Frist announced that he wanted it out of committee and to a full Senate vote by next week. I am afraid he got HIS wish.

Has Reid said anything? Will he.........grrrrrr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. Intereting timing
Just a few hours after the news broke that Bush tacked on another "signing statement" when he signed the Patriot Act.

Maybe he pissed off Spector?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. OH! please please please please PLEASE let this be a good thing!
P-L-E-A-S-E!!!! :hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. nothing on cnn tag runners either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. maybe Wolf will have something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Well, if they think the threat of a censure will energize their base
they are doing the right thing.

I am interested in the fact that Reid has not released a statement yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Truth is our most powerful weapon.
Come on you rat bastards...DO YOUR JOB!!!!!!!

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Any links?
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 04:01 PM by pstans
I can't find anything on CNN, MSNBC, or Yahoo. :shrug:

Abrams on MSNBC is opening his show talking about the police chief in Aruba and Natalee Holloway. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. It was a "breaking news" on the t.v.
I am googling and website searching like crazy - AP, Dems, Knight Ridder, CNN, MSNBC - nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I heard Wolfie just talk about it on CNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Move-On had an action alert yesterday....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. Wolf saying sceduled a hearing only--Repugs may vote it down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. that is possible.
very possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. the meeting next Friday is to discuss IF invest. is necessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. It was an opening teaser. maybe wil have a segment later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. so when does the call-in campaign begin?!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. ...which is by certain a good start!
...If it goes through.

But let's see if it will go further, yeah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
52. "May vote it down". The understatement of the year.
They will jump on it, stomp it, pulverize and kill it at warp speed. "Them truthful documents can be lots of truble fer Bush. We'd best kill that thang fore it hurts somebody."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. Discuss Censure is one thing - Censuring Bush is another I'm..............
......I'm waiting for the final decision before getting excited about this.:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Before the final decision comes though
...there's gotta be somethign to incite it. Specter certainly seems like he's doing his best(despite possible threats by Republicans and so).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Spector is still neocon so don't hold your breath any time soon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. WOOT WOOT WOOT for Russ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. I don't like how this is going.....
Hearings on March 31st.....they end up voting NOT to censure....and then Bush will smell clean again to the unfortunate non-thinking mass called the voting public. If they end up voting TO censure.....Bush gets his hands spanked....and it's on with the show!

By way prior to mid-term election, the whole NSA spying issue is off the table, and Bush gets away, again.....even if it's with a miniature public spanking (which I don't think will win during a vote).

The American public have a very lousy memory.....and this censure will not turn out as we kinda of wanted it to.


That's how I see from here, anyways.....

I Hope I'm wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. They will break speed records throwing this resolution under
the rug. Feingold will complain bitterly. The Republicans will dismiss that as anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. Whoah!!!
Its about freakin time!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
55. PEOPLE THIS IS A FUCKING SETUP!!!
The Senate Judiciary is not going to investigate ANYTHING. They want to set Feingold up because he has been making inroads in the press the last couple of weeks. And they know that once you get the ass-kissing all-stars on the committee like Hatch and that fucking Jeff Sessions and that Texas ass-licker Cornyn going, the Democrats on the committee will NOT come to Feingold's aid. Is Biden gonna help him? Is Schumer? They wouldn't even come out when he made the call for censure and haven't since. When its over, the Rethugs will be able to prance out of the fucking room after dancing all over Feingold's corpse and proclaim to all the world that, "well, at least we had a hearing!!!!" And they will proclaim it all the way to November. THIS THING IS BEING SET UP BECAUSE SPECTER WANTS TO SLAP FEINGOLD IN THE MOUTH. Arlen Specter is not on your side. Don't ever think a republican is on your side. Ever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. the longer they got to deny it, the better...
so russ takes one for the team, so what :shrug:

give'm hell Russ :toast:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC