Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Bush just sign his own death warrant (figuratively speaking)?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:13 PM
Original message
Did Bush just sign his own death warrant (figuratively speaking)?
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 09:26 PM by FatDave
Seems like blaming the media may not have been such a wise move. Up until now the press had handled him and his little war with kid gloves (to put it mildly), seemingly always afraid to report anything negative against him. Today we've been hearing things like "actually, the Iraqis say we're not showing how bad it really is". Olberman's going off, which is to be expected, but I've seen others setting the record straight, even on the Today show this morning. Are we seeing the beginnings of a huge media backlash? Will they now start doing their jobs and nail this SOB and his cronies to the wall?

Edit: changed subject to be less inflamatory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, the polls help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. From your lips to God's ears...
We can hope. It is all we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. We can hope. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bushco will try anything at this point to get those poll numbers back up
you know the ones he doesn't pay attention to? This week--the media, next week--the liberals--week after that--polar bears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I dunno theres still that pesky 30 percent that support the party...
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 09:18 PM by DanCa
come hell or high water. Hell if a Dem had screwed up this much there would be mobs carrying torches in front of the white wash house by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, Dave, I'm wondering if you might want to
change that to "political death warrant" in your header. I'm not an mod, but it caught my attention because it looked like a literal deal, not a figurative one.

But a worthy question to ask, about him pissing off the media. funny, he and Rove and the rest of them have always believed that perception created reality, and that was a driving force in haivng more beholden corporations owning media. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. OK, OK...
Changed it. But now I feel like a total pussy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Well, I would never think that about you...
I suppose you are normally a risk taker. I've seen the mods jump all over posts with the A-word. I guess sometimes it pays not to draw attention to oneself. I think it would totally suck if DUers were hauled in for questioning over a misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. So what took them so long.
They've been blaming the "liberal" media ever since his unelected self took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Well, they've been harping on the "liberal media" since Clinton
But does anybody outside of the far-right nutjobs actually believe that? If the media now starts reporting every gory detail (maybe by picking up footage from Al Jazeera?) then it could only be interpreted one of two ways by the viewing public: Either they were glossing over it before (which is the truth) or things have suddenly gotten much worse in Iraq (not necessarily the truth, but a perception that still damages the Bush admin).

Wasn't the news coverage of Vietnam one of the main things that caused public lack of support? If they now start doing what they should be doing, it's going to be really hard for the right to spin it positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Seems like blaming the media may not have been such a wise move"
It's a Perfect move.

The bush and the right wing spin is the media is treating bush unfairly and not reporting any "good" news, blaming the media!

It presents the media as bias and not trustworthy. Everything must be taken with a grain of salt.

Are we seeing the beginnings of a huge media backlash?


For the public to accept this, they need to trust the media, which as of right now it is about as trustworthy as a used car salesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Helen Thomas on KO, said she feels the reporters are coming out of their
coma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Make sure the media gets bombarded with the story
about the Memo on war crimes.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4863599/site/newsweek/

It is up to you to be the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ha... NO
Please the only thing that will get rid of Bush is a sex scandal or an out and out revolution. He's already broken the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Their meaness will lose the faith of American people
Laura Ingraham smearing the journalists in Iraq saying that they stand on balconies and
just photograph people getting blown up by IED's. Funny all the footage that I have seen
are shots from the ground. Also 70 journalists have been killed in Iraq, 3 are kidnapped
and still being held. I don't think that happened while they were standing on balconies,
do you? (I heard those stats on NBC Nightly News last night). I heard a reporter on
Jim Lehrer tonight say that it is even worse than what you see on Tv. People are so
scared that they are fleeing, they are too scared even to go home to their neighborhoods
to get their things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The irony in that
Is that journalists ought not be able to stand on any balcony and photograph anything blowing up. That's actually an indictment, that journalists can't even find a safe place to stay. What a twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I heard a Bushbot on Jim Lehrer the other night
He said that the journalists should be very careful what they put in the news because it
can have negative impact. Instead of writing stories about casualties; they should write
stories about the heroes fighting over there. Upbeat stories are okay, but the reporting
must be objective, we must know what is going on. The news in this country can not
become a propaganda machine for the ruling party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Hell hath no fury like the media scorned..."
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 09:34 PM by KansDem
The question is: Will W and the Corporate Media whores kiss and make up?

edited to add word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. There was backlash after Katrina but it didn't seem to last long.
I don't think the focus on the war will last long either. It is getting a lot of attention this week because of the anniversary but they will soon turn their focus on something else I am afraid. It seemed that not too long ago, there was no reporting about what is really going on in Iraq. Something is better than nothing I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. the real problem with the media is its corporatization...
...and the motives of corporations don't change no matter what anyone SAYS about them. The only thing that will cause the media to turn on Bush in any significant way is a threat to the profitability of media corporations. Stoking controversy hardly seems likely to do that, IMO, and while individual working journalists and such might feel stung by Bush's remarks, the media at large serves their accounting offices, not their newsrooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC