Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question about memory cards in voting machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:10 PM
Original message
A question about memory cards in voting machines
The ES&S situation has me curious. They are having problems with memory cards (PCMCIA format) that use SRAM with a battery backup. The cards are failing, supposedly because of bad batteries, but some reports are coming in that the battery is not the culprit.

Rack my brain as I might, I cannot come up with any reason for them to use SRAM cards rather than cheaper Flash RAM cards which don't need a battery to store data. Granted they have a finite number of times they can be written to, but given the usage in your average election, this would mean they would fail around the time the Sun begins its final expansion.

Speed can't be an issue. While SRAM is faster than Flash, storing voting data is NOT a high speed operation.

The only reason I can think of is so the salesmen can soak the user by inflating the price of the card, and justifying it to the clueless yob that the data has a "battery backup".

Can anyone think of any reason (security, etc), that they would use SRAM with a battery rather than Flash RAM?

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. This geek
can not think of one good reason to use SRAM in these devices. While the newer flash memory clips are very fast, if you are writting 8 Meg files (one jpg), even the slow drives will be good for this type device.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not to mention that
the data being written is not anywhere that large for a single ballot. These are in OpScan systems which would just be recording a data string and a record ID (precinct, ballot, race, etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ummm, actually the ACTUAL BALLOTS are on the PCMCIA card
If you look at the 1999 ES&S v. Global Patent Infringement lawsuit, you'll find that's the only difference in the 2 systems - and the only reason ES&S lost the suit.

In precincts with hundreds of ballots, space AND load time become a major issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. These are OpScan units
not DREs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't see why they can't go to the local
computer discount story and buy a bunch of cheap PC's, write a program to count votes in a database other then Access, and do it for less then $1000 per machine, with a printer if you really want to splurge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure there's a great reason...
It is called the 'Brother-in-Law Effect.' One of the top guys at the factory has a relative (the BIL) who owns a battery company, so you design his batteries into every project, whether it makes good engineering sense or not. Need to sell a couple of hundred thousand voting machines? Let's design in some obsolete circuits so BIL can make some money selling his batteries, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC