Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O.K.,looks like the Repukes have found their "Mr Personality" (ROMNEY)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:38 AM
Original message
O.K.,looks like the Repukes have found their "Mr Personality" (ROMNEY)
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 10:44 AM by UTUSN
The sL-IMUS circus was live in Boston today. The audience was clearly Repuke, later booed KERRY, and ROMNEY was relaxed, witty, articulate, easily connecting without regard to partisanship based on LIKEABILITY. (Do NOT misread my description with regard to my Dem-ness.) I have long said (wow, my pomposity overwhelms even me) that this is what we need, that personality needs to come first before issues, because ANY good Dem will be good on the issues later. We should have learned from the RAYGUN experience that somebody can be TRAINED as a performer, that just "B"-actor-in-Hollywood status translates into "A+" status in D.C. (with regard to personality, NOT to political performance).

I don't know anything about this ROMNEY dude except that he might have a wingnut-fundie-problem over his Mormon religion. So my impression is just from how he was able to project his personality over t.v.

Later, before KERRY appeared, sL-IMUS asked the audience their opinion of him. There were a few positive yells, but mostly loud groaning and booing. sL-IMUS then said, "When he comes out you bastards are going to be polite and pretend to like him, the way I'm pretending to like you."

For (my) comparison right after ROMNEY, KERRY was pedestrian with forced jokes, but intelligent, well versed in the serious part of his talk. (I was a KERRY supporter from the start of the primaries in '04, based on my believing he would be the most aggressive, strongest, against the Repukes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. We had that in Edwards, but Lurch had to go all-out Rambo on us and
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 10:40 AM by DS1
show up in Boston as part as a pseudo-amphibious assault :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now, now - *I* would not call an outstanding Dem "Lurch" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Did you mean to reply to me (post #2)? If so, you're barking up the wrong
tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Lurch?"
Come on, now. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep, he thought about contesting the vote in Ohio for about
45 seconds.

I'll call him whatever the hell I damn want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Fair enough.
I'm still bitter about it as well, but I also remember all of the things he has done over his career and have more respect for him than you.

But more power to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. get over it, same old tired talking point. I think he did the only thing
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 11:21 AM by wisteria
he could do under the circumstances. He would have been perceived as a joke if he would have tried to fight the results at that time. He is not a fool, unlike some other people who use this poor excuse to bash him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. get over it., i've heard that before too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Romney is as faux-charming as his plastic hair
"Likeability"? I couldn't stop laughing at how very akin to J Danforth Quayle he is. I fail to see him as any sort of repuke triple-threat for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good. I drift in and out of dozing through sL-MUS so maybe
my perception is impaired. I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. wouldn't you have said the same thing about GWB in say 1998?
I know I DID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. You did? My condolences
I paid little heed to him early on, but as late as 2000 I knew Junior was a stealth wingnut candidate masquerading as a moderate. But then I'm prejudiced, of course. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. oh I knew he WHAT he was....
I just didn't think he had a snowball's chance in hell of EVER being elected President!

Of course, he never really was - so I should rephase that to say

I just didn't think he had a snowball's chance in hell of EVER being President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. The Supreme Court made that decision for us
so your assumption was a fair one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Romney
ICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. lying, conniving, manipulating Mormon trying to fulfill mormon prophecy
Be afraid, be very afraid of this one.....IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. he cracked another funny on Imus:
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 11:06 AM by npincus
Imus: "Did your wife ever think in her wildest dreams that you would run for President?"

Romney: "I'm not in my wife's wildest dreams".

Gotta admit, that was funny- and very daring for a Mormon. That said, the CRAP that he spouted on Iraq made me very afraid that he may charm enough idiots to.... (oh, Lord, I can't say it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Also said that he believed marriage only between a man and a woman and
a woman and a women and a women .......

Not ready for Late Night - but he does have good writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. he has some charisma
better then most GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Surprisingly he didn't drag out "Take my wives...please!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. tee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. He'd probably be the most formidable candidate the GOP could put up
As a resident of Massachusetts, he's always reminded me of a game show host. Very good looking, very glib and very shallow.

Not a very good governor, but a great candidate.

There's a certain chamelian quality to him. He's like an empty vessel that people can project whatever they want onto him. You want a moderate reasonable Main St. Republican? He can be your guy. But on the other hand, if you want a right-wing family valuses fundy, he can also be your guy.

Red meat for the Red States, and a Wall St. Republican who can make it among moderates in a blue states. A formidable combination.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. "Formidable" not really, however
there are plenty of shallow voters who willingly allow themselves to be thoroughly snowed by an empty vessel like Romney. Most people believe what they want to believe and projection is definitely a possibility. Guess we'll just have to conjure a dark horse Dem candidate with many of the same qualities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. You hit the nail on the head with "Game Show Host"
But you forget he's Mormon, and I can't imagine some of those religious whackos voting for a non-fundie candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. I watched today because I knew Kerry
would be on, but not what time.

Romney was as you described. I didn't see all of him being there, but enough. Until he talked about gays adopting children as though it were bad for children he seemed very pleasant.

I like that historian (Doris something something) who came on after Kerry, I always enjoy her. She talked about how intelligent and really good Kerry was and wishing he could come across better when he talked. She joked Imus should give him lessons. Well no.

But I thought of charm school or really acting lessons, kind of the idea you have.
My sister is an actress and they can present anything well and be believable even when they don't really know what they are talking about. She and her friends that are actors get hired between plays for a variety of things some do part time pharmaceutical sales or other things that should require expertise, but they have none. What they do have is the ability to learn a script and deliver it in persuasive ways and make a lot of money for whoever they work for.

I know a lot of entertainers and knew a lot of politicians growing up. The most successful have a lot in common in being able to charm, amuse and sway others effortlessly.

Neither Gore nor kerry had that with a crowd. They shouldn't have to, that's not what a president needs...but it helps you get the votes to get there.

When Kerry ran I really believed the country would appreciate his gravitas and intelligence given the seriousness of the times and prefer that over bush's shallow goofiness. (I still think Kerry won, but that's not the point)

But even without an actors charm is someone is just very comfortable in themselves and talks straight rather then spinning and is experienced and well qualified...like Feingold or Clark. Maybe he is funny too, haven't heard him enough. But he does know how to express complex issues in simpler terms, he is a straight talker. People with that quality should do well too.

But if they run a Romney we do need someone who knows how to connect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. #s 15 & 17, thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. I watched Imus this am
Mitt was charming indeed, but a Mormon for pres will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Shit Romney is an empty suit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. It was awful, and I am so angry about this. Kerry was absolutely
wonderful under the circumstances. It was nothing more than a Republican Love in on Imus this morning. I was so angry, I wrote and told him how bad that show was and that if he wanted his wife to continue getting orders for her environmental friendly cleaning products, he had better watch out how he treated Dem's, since we are more concerned about the environment than amy repub would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
26. Since Mormons told the existing church to fuck off
I kind of doubt that he could be elected nationally. JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC