Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Censure Vote Breakdown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:33 PM
Original message
Censure Vote Breakdown

It takes 51 votes to pass...

Assuming loyal opposition (Huge assumption, I know...):
There is 44 Democrats and one Independent = 45 yes votes.


Who are the other six? Some possibilities:

Allen (Chance to distance himself before '08, he did some distancing from Bush on MTP yesterday)
Brownback (Chance to distance himself before '08... believes pres. broke the law)
Chafee (Join us, Lincoln, we can be friends!)
Craig (Libertarian-leaning conservative, opposed earlier version of new Patriot Act. Has publicly opposed the wiretapping program)
Collins (Homeland Security and Govt. Affairs Cmte. Chairwoman, has said they should look into wiretapping)
DeWine (Has a huge reelection challenge... Has basically led the Republicans who are against this program)
Graham (Also Grilled Gonzales in Judiciary cmte. hearing)
Hagel (Chance to distance himself before '08, Has expressed discontent with program in Intelligence Committee)
Specter (Has spoken against wiretaps)
Lott (What better way to hit back for his dethroning that still irks him?)
McCain (Believes pres. broke the law...)
Snowe (Has expressed discontent with program in Intelligence Committee)

Any others?


Things to remember:
- Even John Ashcroft had reservations about this program.
- Admins has offered shifting justifications of the program that most agree are crap
- There's a good chance some of those Republicans up there would rather support changing the FISA laws rather than a censure
- We might lose some Dems (Holy Joe, Ben Nelson, ?)
- Senators take an oath:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks For The Effort....
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 02:37 PM by OrangeCountyDemocrat
But you're wasting your time. Here's the breakdown:

Perhaps you'll get 35-40 Dems on board. I'd say there's about 10% chance you would have more than 40.

There won't be Any Repubs. Zero! Zilch! NONE!

The sooner we stop living in this fantasy world, where elected leaders have any conviction or conscience....the better.

The vote will be something like 35-65 in favor, assuming it even gets that far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think you're being optimistic.
I will be surprised if a dozen Democrats vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I can only think of about three or four
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. I Was Afraid Of Being Called A Pessimist
You're right though. Probably under 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Having the craveness of repukes...
on the record will be useful; perhaps sooner rather than later. I think it is important for Feingold to try, to show that only Democrats stand up for the rule of law. (Wait...could that be a campaign position for the fall?...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think a censure has a chance of passing.
C'mon- these are Republicans. They're trying to write new laws to make Bush's crimes legal, and the people who report on them criminals themselves. If they had any sense of morality or duty, they'd have displayed it a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't think we can count on McCain as he's trying to get *'s fundraising
machine on his side for '08 pres election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. does Censure take Impeachment off the table?
If it does, then I don't support it.

I heard a Feingold sound bite on CNN... something to the effect of introducing censure to avoid impeachment (not verbatim, but that was the jist).

Sorry, censure insteadof impeachment doesn't cut it- for me. Impeach the bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jane_pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. No. From Russ' diary on Kos:
"Congress may consider a range of other actions, including investigations, an independent counsel, or even impeachment. But at a minimum, and as a first step, Congress should censure a president who has so plainly broken the law."

http://senator-russ-feingold.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/13/114144/941
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. oh, thank you.
I've been trying to get that answered.

I think we really may win back Congress in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. When censure is rejected, post-Nov Dem Congress can present impeachment
and say "We TRIED to censure and you wouldn't let us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll be (pleasantly) amazed if it get's 20 yes votes.
I can't imagine any Republican voting for it, and far too few trembling Dems. Tho' I do have high hopes for my Senator Patty Murray who usually has the backbone to actually stand for something that's obviously right - even if it isn't "smart" politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for the breakdown of votes.
No matter what the real chance of censure is it is vital that a record be made and real pressure be brought on possible aye votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not a single Republican will vote to Censure Bush
and probably only half of the dems will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You're probably right
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 02:48 PM by Nutmegger
The house of cards will fall yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sadly, It's going to be a party line toe the line thing
Republicans have put it squarely into "playing politics" and will vote against it; then they'll blame Democrats as being un-patriotic, un-supportive of the Commander in Chief (and in a time of WAR!!! *gasp*), and un-resolved over the country's National Security.

If they could find a way to squeeze in a tax and spend or liberal smack they'll do that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not even
If more than 28 Dems vote for censure I'll kiss your ass in Macy's window. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm taking a leap of faith and going for 38
45 minus the 7 "gang of 14" Dems.

You're probably correct, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. 38? ROFL...You're mad
If it's over thirty I'll do pirouettes while wearing a mint green tutu in the friggin' town square! 38? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Of course I'm mad!
Crazy as a loon! The Cons tell me every day on news and talk radio that I'm angry, loony, crazy, rabid, intolerant, unpatriotic, weak, ...did I get them all?

I really thought there would be an organized effort to put pressure on the Senators, especially Democratic Sentors to vote for this resolution. Apparently the call tree didn't get activated or something. They don't lose single thing by voting yes, and gain by showing unity...for once.

oh, well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Don't count on it.
I think very few Democrats are going to support this. It won't be party line, it will be a bi-partisan defeat.

I hope I'm wrong. Party line would make me very happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. boohoo! You're smashing my dream!
*wags finger*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think CNN said Reid was not supporting censure
the MSM keeps telling us "American support B*sh's warrantless wiretap program".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Figures!
Somehow it doesn't surprise me one bit. :(

People should be calling him and jamming that phone line. There's an 800 number to do it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I hate it....
when they call it a program. For all we know Bush is listening in on Dems phone conversation and maybe Kerry's during the 2004 election. If Bush does not want to go to the FISA court even retroactively for a warrant then he must be up to something no good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. If that's true, Reid should not only step down from his leadership post,
but should vacate his seat before being incarcerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. Why would he? He's only the leader of the "opposition". :-( (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. The spineless wonders voting to censure??
Not a prayer - maybe 10-12 Dems, tops.

Maybe.

If it's a nice day.

And the sun is shining.

(more like 3 or 4, however)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. Lieberman Vote For Censure?
Don't think so. I'll be surprised if he gets 10 support votes. But hey, you know, everything has to start somewhere and I count this as a nice beginning. Look how long Watergate took to reach it's inevitable conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. LMAO!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicofaraby Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. They either support warrantless wiretaps on citizens
or they don't.

The issue is stark and clear.

American voters are watching.

Feingold is brillliant. There are only two choices. What'll it be Senators?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Hi chicofaraby!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. Maria Cantwell will vote Nay
I have $10 saying she will vote not to censure. She has a noteable record of supporting the President, after all, Democrat though she may (allegedly) be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. smart move by Russ F--public vote to hold the Pres. accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC