Impeachment of Bush will show the true face of the Conservative Movement

[ck4829]

This is another reason why we must work for the Impeachment of Bush.

The Far Right has been working for decades to do this 'work' on America.

We know this: What they have started with Raygun, they plan to finish with Bush.

And we know this as well: It's being pushed through the RW Media, that they should work to keep Democrats out, just so Bush won't be impeached.

IF we get enough Democrats and Pro-Impeachment Republicans in Congress, the 'compassionate' Conservative will quickly disappear and the Malicious Conservative willing to do ANYTHING to preserve their agenda will be revealed.

(And by ANYTHING, I'm hoping it's just Smear Campaigns and Propaganda BUT I might just be wrong)

We have to do this BTW, if we can reveal the Conservatives in their true form and defeat them then an Age of Progressivism will most likely begin in the US.

And, I think we're ready to deal with anything they throw at us.

[Sammy Pepys]

1. Well, of course they're going to do anything...

...to maintain power. Whenever someone or some group gets it, it's one of the first things they become preoccupied with.

But beyond that, I'm afraid we're not ready for whatever they might have coming. We need to get focus, get some real leadership in Congress, and get folks active. We've got too little of all of the above at this moment. 2006 will be our earliest and perhaps only opportunity to get things rolling, so we've got to make it count.

[seeminer21]

2. I agree with you...

That IS a lame comparison! Ha ha. Oh, and they'll fight like cornered rats.

[populistdriven]

3. The Neocons make Liberal opinions look Conservative

There is nothing conservative about these assholes.


If you can show people how far from true Conservatives the Neocons are then moderate Conservatives will shift Democratic.

[otohara]

4. Didn't Yesterday's Election in Texas

show the true face of the Conservative Movement?

[Ufomammut]

6. Never happen

...and if it does, it'll be "for show" as was Clinton's "impeachment" - to help smear the dems image in the public mind to better shift the focus for their then upcoming power grab/2000 coup/staged 9/11/phony "war on terror" which repugs began during the Reagan admin.

The power structure fears a people's revolution, so they may sacrifice W, spin the damage to the repug party, allow a dem to be "elected" in 08 in order to put a "friendlier face" on American fascism, and then stage the next big attack. Sort of lulling the public into a false sense of security ...haha, no pun intended.

Besides, I still maintain that's one of the key reasons "they" picked W, he's an easy target, and if someone has to be made an "example" of, better him than Jeb, from their POV anyway.

[JNelson6563]

5. Yep, like Nixon.

But they won't change.