Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate panel rejects bid for NSA inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:20 PM
Original message
Senate panel rejects bid for NSA inquiry
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 07:24 PM by Rose Siding
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republicans on Tuesday agreed to expand oversight of President George W. Bush's domestic spying program but rejected Democratic pressure for a broad inquiry into eavesdropping on U.S. citizens.

Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, Republican chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said the committee voted to create a new seven-member subcommittee that would scrutinize the eavesdropping under a plan approved by the White House.
.....
In addition, the White House has begun discussions with several Republican lawmakers on legislative language that could further regulate the program.

"I believe the president is prepared to sign a bill once the Congress does work its will," Roberts told reporters after a closed-door committee meeting.

"When it comes to national security, I prefer accommodation over confrontation whenever possible. We should fight the enemy. We should not fight each other."
.....
"The committee, to put it bluntly, is basically under the control of the White House through its chairman," said a visibly frustrated Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia, ranking Democrat on the intelligence committee.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/07/AR2006030701321.html

And for good measure, DeWine's bill (which lured Hagel and Snowe) has an chillingly interesting, forward-thinking feature:

snip>
His bill does not require that the terror groups must be foreign. Nor does it rely on the State Department's Foreign Terrorist Organization list, which is often used in government as a reference about which organizations are considered most dangerous.

When asked last week why he didn't use the State Department's list, DeWine said he wanted to give the president flexibility, particularly so he did not have to come to Congress to update the organizations that could be monitored.

"You might have a terrorist group come up in six months that would be equally as bad as al-Qaida," DeWine said.

http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/washington/index.ssf?/base/politics-9/1141770577300310.xml&storylist=washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. so, once agian Roberts protects Bush! damm damm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. This needs to be used in the elections to strangle the Pukes.
Spying on citizens can not be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every one of us needs to CALL, WRITE, FAX to PROTEST THIS
immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. "I prefer accommodation over confrontation"


...."When it comes to national security, I prefer accommodation over confrontation whenever possible. We should fight the enemy. We should not fight each other."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well, if they push this, they are MY enemy and I'm going to FIGHT it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. WHERE THE HELL IS PHASE TWO???!!!
You rat bastard.:puke:!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. He foisted that off onto the DoD (investigating the DoD)
in a maneuver calculated to stall, taking up to a couple of years according to Rockefeller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. BTW Roberts still owes us Phase II (which will be another whitewash)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. committee members list here.
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 07:37 PM by rodeodance

http://intelligence.senate.gov/members.htm

MEMBERSHIP


REPUBLICANS

Pat Roberts, Kansas, Chairman,
Orrin G. Hatch, Utah
Mike Dewine, Ohio
Christopher S. Bond, Missouri
Trent Lott, Mississippi
Olympia J. Snowe, Maine
Chuck Hagel, Nebraska
Saxby Chambliss, Georgia


DEMOCRATS
John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia, Vice Chairman
Carl Levin, Michigan
Dianne Feinstein, California
Ron Wyden, Oregon
Evan Bayh, Indiana
Barbara A. Mikulski, Maryland
Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Take back congress in 06'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. wish we could find a bog for Roberts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. "a plan approved by the White House"
Oh FFS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. These people are traitors-- they took an oath and they are breaking it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lldu Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, we let the criminal rat bastard in the White House
write it so it MUST be legal!


We republican bastards of congress would never ever do anything wrong. Wait, was that last statement approved by the rat bastard in the White House?

God! Someone make sure the rat bastard in the white house said it was Ok for us to talk. Wouldn't want the rat bastard in the white house to get upset with us republican bastards in congress.

He is a god! He can't do any wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. What IS the matter with Kansas.....kick that SOB out already.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Executive Tyranny!
GW Bush and Cheney must be Impeached, found guilty, thrown out and then indicted for their crimes, period!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC