Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Cadaver Dogs are engaged as heavy debris removal begins in 9th ward

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:17 PM
Original message
CNN: Cadaver Dogs are engaged as heavy debris removal begins in 9th ward
How sad. They said that up to two thousand people are still listed as "missing" from this area.

FEMA just recently released funds to continue this work.

CNNs reporting has moved up a notch. They had a very interesting piece on Skid Row early this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Q: how many official NOLA dead?
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 05:30 PM by leveymg
Found this at Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina#Death_toll_.28summary.29

;(
Death toll (summary)
State Official
State total County/
Parish Confirmed deaths Direct deaths Reported missing
Alabama 2
<4>
Washington 2 <5> 0
Florida 14
<6>
Broward 6 <7> 3
Miami-Dade 5 <8><9> 1
Georgia 2
<10>
Carroll 2 <11> 2
Kentucky 1
<12>
Christian 1 <13> 1
Louisiana 1,104
<14>
Ascension 9 <15> ?
Assumption 3 <16> ?
Caddo 11 <17> 0
East Baton Rouge 72 <18> 2 (?)
Iberia 6 <19> ?
Jefferson 30 <20><21> 22
Lafourche 2 <22>
Livingston 5 <23> 1 (?)
Orleans 720+ <24> 155
Plaquemines 3 <25> 3
St. Bernard 127 <26> 125 47 <27>
St. Charles 8 <28> ?
St. Landry 1 <29> 0
St. Tammany 7 <30> 6
Tangipahoa 26 <31> 0 (?)
Terrebonne 19 <32> 0 (?)
West Baton Rouge 3 <33> 0 (?)
Mississippi 238
<34>
Adams 2 <35> 2
Forrest 7 <36> ?
Harrison 91 <37> ?
Hancock 51 <38> ?
Hinds 1 <39> 1
Jackson 12 <40><41> ?
Jones 12 <42> ?
Lauderdale 2 <43> 2
Leake 1 <44> 1
Pearl River 17 <45> 17
Simpson 1 <46> 1
Stone 1 <47> 1
Warren 1 <48> 1
Ohio 2
<49>
Jefferson 2 <50> 0
Other 0
<51>
Evacuees 57 <52> 0
Totals 1,420<53> 1326+ 346+ 6,644 <54>
Note: Because of differences in the timing of reports from different sources, states' State sub-totals may not match their individual county State sub-totals.

As of January 27, the confirmed death toll stood at 1,420, mainly from Louisiana (1,104) and Mississippi (238). (Unlike some published figures, this includes deaths in Ohio (2), Kentucky (1), and among evacuees (57).) <38>

Direct deaths indicate those caused by the direct effects of the winds, flooding, storm surge or oceanic effects of Katrina. Indirect deaths indicate those caused by hurricane-related accidents (including car accidents), fires or other incidents, as well as clean-up incidents and health issues.

The New Orleans Times Picayune newspaper ran a story in November 2005 noting that 5000 missing New Orleans residents are still unaccounted for.

In hard-hit St. Bernard Parish, which was 100% flooded by Katrina, the search for the missing was slow. According to an interview in the Times Picayune, the coroner was still trying to get a list of missing from the Red Cross in November 2005. The initial list of missing persons of around 200 residents was published at several local media outlets. <39> While there were some victims on this list whose bodies were found in their homes as recently as December 2005; the vast majority were tracked down through word-of-mouth and credit card records.

As of December 2005, the official missing list in St. Bernard Parish stood at 47 <40>. It was feared that shrimpers and oystermen who usually ride out storms in their boats may have been swept into the marshes by the surge. While there were news reports of marsh searches reported on CNN, a more comprehensive search of the marshes of Eastern St. Bernard Parish was to begin in January 2006.

After protracted arguments over who would handle the costs, DNA testing began in early December to identify approximately 263 bodies that could not be identified by other means.<41>

;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Who knows? 1,000 and 1,000s. More than on 9-11 although you'll never
hear Chimpy admit it. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. 1420
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina#Death_toll_.28summary.29
<snip>
Death toll (summary)
As of January 27, the confirmed death toll stood at 1,420, mainly from Louisiana (1,104) and Mississippi (238). (Unlike some published figures, this includes deaths in Ohio (2), Kentucky (1), and among evacuees (57).) <38>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there anything left for cadaver dogs to detect after 6 months?
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. they said yes, there would be an odor for them to recognize
they said as heavy debris was finally going to be removed, that they were expecting to find many of the missing bodies.

How sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here it comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. heavy debris removal . . .
. . . has taken six months to get in full swing?

Honest to jeebus, I don't understand how they are getting away with such mass negligence. Mind-boggling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. they said it was because the funds were just released for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. WHAT! there were no funds for NO yet there is for IRAQ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. it is absolutely sickening and unbelievable
people who think this isn't about both race AND poverty have their heads clear up their ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. right ON
i can only add that their soul may be there as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harald Ragnarsson Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Compare that to evidence at WTC complex
They had the entire WTC cleaned up in a shorter time than this and the steel shipped off to China for recycling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Once the TV cameras
left the public was on to other matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yes.
welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is a damn shame........
What's it been now......6 months?? This should have been done long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. it is very sad.
the poor families involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BEZERKO Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. OMG,
Edited on Sat Mar-04-06 02:27 AM by BEZERKO
I don't mean to sound naive, but the thought never occured to me that the incompetence over clearing the massive debris from Katrina and Rita was not due to incopetence. I think they mean to minimize the death tool. It gives more time for animals to scavenge, bodies to decompose, and the true death toll never to be known for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. honestly - if it is under heavy debris,
Edited on Sat Mar-04-06 11:40 AM by FLDem5
I do not think scavenging animals would be able to reach it.

At least I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. They've tunred us into a 3rd world country.
One needs look no further than the Gulf Coast to realize this.

When Bush calls them "people from that part of the world" shows just how fucking detached this monster truely is. These are AMERICANS he calls "people from that part of the world". As if they were some 3rd world nation with no funds to take care of themselves...

Welcome to Bush's ownership society.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC