Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prisons Often Shackle Pregnant Inmates in Labor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:36 AM
Original message
Prisons Often Shackle Pregnant Inmates in Labor
New York Times
March 2, 2006
Prisons Often Shackle Pregnant Inmates in Labor
By ADAM LIPTAK

Shawanna Nelson, a prisoner at the McPherson Unit in Newport, Ark., had been in labor for more than 12 hours when she arrived at Newport Hospital on Sept. 20, 2003. Ms. Nelson, whose legs were shackled together and who had been given nothing stronger than Tylenol all day, begged, according to court papers, to have the shackles removed. Though her doctor and two nurses joined in the request, her lawsuit says, the guard in charge of her refused. "She was shackled all through labor," said Ms. Nelson's lawyer, Cathleen V. Compton. "The doctor who was delivering the baby made them remove the shackles for the actual delivery at the very end."

Despite sporadic complaints and occasional lawsuits, the practice of shackling prisoners in labor continues to be relatively common, state legislators and a human rights group said. Only two states, California and Illinois, have laws forbidding the practice. The New York Legislature is considering a similar bill. Ms. Nelson's suit, which seeks to ban the use of restraints on Arkansas prisoners during labor and delivery, is to be tried in Little Rock this spring. The California law, which came into force in January, was prompted by widespread problems, said Sally J. Lieber, a Democratic assemblywoman from Mountain View. "We found this was going on in some institutions in California and all over the United States," Ms. Lieber said. "It presents risks not only for the inmate giving birth, but also for the infant." ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/02/national/02shackles.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, you can't have them jumping off the table and escaping!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. (while you're in labor)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. She was shackled for a reason....
She was an inmate. All inmates remain shackled when out on a round trip from the Prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. With babies trying to get out through legs pressed together?
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 10:24 AM by SoCalDem
makes for a tight squeeze..Wonder what happens when lawsuits pop up over brain damaged babies:shrug:

Surely they could figure a way to strap her legs to the stirrup thingie so she wouldn;t bolt and run away..

She'd be easy to catch..what with the blood trail she would leave as she hobbled down the hall...before she came to the locked door
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Your sarcasm is foolish.
Without 100% security in an unsecured community style hospital......people get hurt or dead. Additionally, there is plenty of chain length with the shackles to permit a vaginal delivery......

The reference article is bias.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. So, I'm guessing they don't get to walk around during labor either
even though it helps the labor. but as a nurse you know that.

It's a stupid rule, and it should be ammended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They can walk with shackles.
They are a security risk. The fact that they are pregnant will not erase the fact that are convicted criminals who will and have attempted to harm non-security staff in such situations. Serious injuries have occurred to well intended care givers. Believe me, the mental pathology is frighteningly dangerous. To trust and be empathetic can be ones last mistake to make.

it is my understanding that some prisons do not have a maternity/LD set up and need to use a community setting. When a community setting is use, all safety measure must be precisely followed.

Think about it. If a family/friend of the prisoner knows about the hospitalization via another inmate calling to them from prison, guaranteed, an escape is imminent.

The best resolution is a hospital wing designed for inmates where the security perimeter has been well established. Community settings are not secure, thus this step must be taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. just wondering, have you had a baby?
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 12:26 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
I've had 3, and there is no way you can escape once hard labor sets in.

from that 'biased' article...

"Many states justify restraints because the prisoners remain escape risks, though there have apparently been no instances of escape attempts by women in labor."

I'm googling, and finding no reports.

as far as women in labor being dangerous, I really wanted to slug the dad, who was next to me during the first labor! He had bruises on his arm for weeks after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Once the standard is set and the word is
out on the street....That when you go in labor, all security is off..............the plans will commence. The next thought is when does security resume? Is it a judgement call and by whom?

The best way to deal with it is to avoid the need to access the public hospitals for incarcerated inmates.

Option:

Set-up secure a floor-wing for prisons at the hospital for inmates only and provide a birthing center with nursery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Your clinical manner is always impressive
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 05:55 AM by buddyhollysghost
but...have you ever been in labor?

I've never heard of an inmate in labor attacking anyone, though I'm sure at one time or another this may have happenned. Nevertheless, most female prisoners in the US are "in" for non-violent drug offenses.


This IS cruel and unusual punishment when a prisoner has shown zero propensity to be a flight risk and is not prone to assault others. I am amazed at how cold-hearted you appear to be about this issue and other issues involving restraining people. Always. It just amazes me, really.

I hope I never reach the level of losing my humanity or my concern for others. I hope I never reach the point where I am quick to use the most force and to believe the very worst about other human beings.

Sometimes, our fear of others makes us lose our own humanity, and we become the abusive thing we fear.

Y'think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I understand you do not have any
responsibility for others while under your employment. So, your reference point is clearly not contemporary to this issue of safety. Humanity is not limited to the moment. It is negligent to place non-security trained medical staff in harms way, without security measures. The inmate and the baby are all alive and well in this article as is the medical staff.


If you take the time and visit the associated thread you can read my other posts for details on the rationale.

A final note, I appreciate your affable nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. And you know this....how?
As far as my employment that is....I have to deal with law enforcement in my business regularly, and have never found reason to call them to restrain anyone. I've been able to handle any problems by being A HUMAN.

And you gave birth......when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I see you want to be
disrespectful.

Bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. kudos
the constant, shrill apologetics for this barbarity is getting old fast.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And not only on this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I know
The one in LBN was rather "enlightening" also. Such compassion. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yup... does this noble profession proud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Thanks
It's getting old, and it makes my heart hurt :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thread in LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. & an earlier thread in GD...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks, I missed that one. Here's an Amnisty International report
from 1999

"Giving birth while incarcerated was one of the most horrifying experiences of my life. While enduring intense labour pains, I was handcuffed while being taken to the hospital, even though I was in a secured vehicle with a metal grating between the driver's and passenger's compartments and with no interior door handles on the passenger doors. With the handcuffs on, I could not even hold my stomach to get some comfort from the pain...At the hospital I was shackled to a metal bed post by my right ankle throughout seven hours of labour, although a correctional officer was in the room with me at all times. The shackles were not removed until 30 minutes prior to my delivery...Imagine being shackled to a metal bedpost, excruciating pains going through my body, and not being able to adjust myself to even try to feel any type of comfort, trying to move and with each turn having hard, cold metal restraining my movements. Not only was this painful, it was traumatizing, and very stressful for myself and also for my child...Even animals would not be shackled during labour, a household dog or a cow on a farm..The birth of a child is supposed to be a joyous experience, and I was robbed of the joy of my daughter's birth..Is it really necessary to handcuff and shackle mothers who are in labour? With all the other security measures that were in place, and with my minimum security status, did they really have to put me and my infant through that torture?"
Statement of Warnice Robinson, imprisoned in Illinois for shoplifting

http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/women/report5.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. so much for the person upthread who claimed...
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 02:45 PM by VelmaD
that pregnant inmates in labor are violent criminals and security risks. The woman quoted above was a minimum security prisoner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. there's more stories at that link...
but it's hard to read thru tears...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Check the original thread -- lots of good stats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. I've worked in hospitals with prison units
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 03:02 AM by Horse with no Name
and I hardly see the need for leg shackles during labor.
Handcuffing would serve the purpose quite fine, and if someone really felt the need, soft leg restraints would work out much better and are much more sanitary.
I can only imagine what kind of horrible and nasty germs live on the chains of shackles (since I am quite certain they don't clean them before labor), it is horrible to imagine what an innocent infant might come into contact with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Make_Mistakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Not referring to pregnancy, but there was an incident or two in
Philly with prison transports, and yes, I believe at least one inmate shot a security guard. Well, the hospital personnel are already stressed to the max with long hours, and now, they have to get shot by inmates? If that inmate shot someone, do you really need to believe, they shouldn't have been in prison in the first place?

Here we go, completely private hospitals, no one, but those who can pay for their services admitted. Just sometimes, things aren't as they seem. I hope you have money for those non public hospitals, because if you can't glimpse into the issue, the RW'ers will get away with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. You don't have to put someone in leg shackles
to have them physically restrained. The hospital that I worked at had an inmate take the metal hanger that the IV fluid hung on and break it in half and held it to their carotid so I know the dangers.
WHEN instances such as this happen, it means someone didn't do their job.
The guards get lax.
I had a patient who was an inmate and I pulled back the covers to do an assessment and he was completely unrestrained. The guard was standing there with a gun, yes, however, they have strict orders to never shoot in the hospital.
No matter what the inmate patient does. I told the guard if he didn't restrain the inmate that I would call his commanding officer.
Transports and inpatient status are two different animals.
Don't confuse the issues. That is EXACTLY where clever misdirection is getting you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thank you for sharing.
Your experience is just one reality example of the acute danger EVERY inmate presents when at a public facility. I hope you and I have enlightened a few here of the seriousness and need to protect the non-security medical personnel when dealing with inmates.

I would of called the Lieutenant anyways. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. There are ways to take the necessary precautions
humanely and with much more dignity than leg shackles allow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. I agree with utilizing
an alternative restraint...if at all possible. Leathers can be just as affective and be locked. Cloth restraints pose another risk.

You are so right about the nosocomial source of infection with the shackles. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. Sick people!
Oh yeah I'm sure the person is going to run away while they're in major labor pains. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC