Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's NSA Spying Jeopardizes National Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Marleyb Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:37 AM
Original message
Bush's NSA Spying Jeopardizes National Security
Now it appears that besides massively violating the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against illegal search and seizure, this illegal spying may have put the U.S. at risk by undermining the prosecution of possible terror suspects.

By illegally snooping on people's email and phone conversations, without first making a showing to a judge of some probable cause for the monitoring, the administration has opened the door for defense attorneys to seek new trials for their clients based upon a claim of improperly obtained evidence. Other cases that have yet to be brought to trial may end up being thrown out on the same grounds. ...

"What this means is that George Bush, by violating the rules on domestic surveillance by the NSA, has compromised national security," says Bonifaz. "This scandal effectively prevents the prosecution of people, some of whom may actually be culpable as terrorists."

He explains that as the public learns from public court proceedings just what the extent of the NSA domestic spying campaign has been, and how it has damaged legitimate prosecutions, and as higher courts begin to rule on the impact of and illegality of that campaign, there could be growing calls for impeachment on that issue alone.
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff12302005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. So does offshoring. But he says that's a good thing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. But, the Bush team has NO intention of pursuing legal recourse against
terrorists.

It simply wants to be able to identify people as "enemy combatants," deny them the right of habeous corpus, and place them in detention where they will be subjected to torture until they die from the brutality in a prolonged, dehumanizing and very painful death.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yup that sounds like the
Edited on Sun Jan-01-06 11:06 AM by billybob537
American way to me.:evilfrown: :wtf: :spank:
spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. just like everything Bush touches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Law of Unintended Consequences
I guess that's what happens when you never think through the consequences of your actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if Padilla is one of those people?
Maybe that is one reason they don't wish for him to have an attorney or a trial..I suspect it is the case and they will just so so what????? Eat me..... Republicans are known for their civility...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC