Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

168 Safety Violations = $3,600.00 (From dKos)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 08:50 AM
Original message
168 Safety Violations = $3,600.00 (From dKos)
(snip....)

So I looked at the Mine's violations, and I found a lot of them. A heck of a lot. Most for about $60 (less than a speeding ticket), some for as much as $200 at some times and wow, there was even one for $440! Now that's tough enforcement!

In reality, the slow creep away from enforcement, led by people like Cass Ballenger and Petetr Hoekstra and their GOP allies is what really caused this. Just think, what is more profitable?

Paying a total of $3,600 for 168 fines or paying a couple hundred thousand to fix those problems?

Sad as it is, it's more profitable to pay those cheap fines, especially when you know the inspectors are going to come ahead of time anyways.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/3/111733/1034

:( :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. This really pisses me off!
I hope it opens the eyes of some of the deluded (it is no longer PC to refer to them as sheeple).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody Is On The Take
A $60 dollar fine? I've been around industry for a long, long time, and i've never heard of any gov't agency fining someone $60. The owners of this mine are obviously paying somebody off. This stinks to high heaven.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Washington Post article goes into some of the violations
But in MSHA's reports, 18 of the 46 most recent violations were listed as "significant and substantial." Among the problems cited: inadequate safeguards against the collapse of the mine roof and inadequate ventilation to guard against the buildup of deadly gases.

Other inspection reports over the past two years fault the mine for "combustibles," including a buildup of flammable coal dust and a failure to adequately insulate electric wires. Sparks from electrical equipment can ignite coal dust and methane gas, triggering fires and explosions.

The mine is contesting some of the violations, while agreeing to pay more than $24,000 in penalties to settle others.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/03/AR2006010301433.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, That Settles It
Now i believe more than ever that someone was paid off. Significant and substantial violations carry with them, by OSHA and MSHA regulations, criminal penalties for failure to comply after first offense.

The only way they got away with this is bribery.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. $3,600....
... the price of 12 lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Which works out to a tidy $300 per life
Easy to calculate, huh?

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. what the hell?
when i was in the tower industry we would get a 10,000$ fine just for someone forgetting to use a hard hat, non negotiable. Evidently they knew who's back to scratch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rachel Maddow was talking about this earlier and also how the company
that owned the mine, made it a practice to buy bankrupted mines that had no unions to contend with. By doing so, the workers had absolutely no leverage as to the safety issues being resolved. I hope that the families in turn, bankrupt the owners for every dime they have, and that the owners are thrown into prison for negligent homicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC