Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK IT'S OFFICIAL: CHENEY LIED TO A POLICE OFFICER!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:54 PM
Original message
OK IT'S OFFICIAL: CHENEY LIED TO A POLICE OFFICER!
Here we have that Cheney told Officer Gilberto San Miguel that Whittington was 30 YARDS away: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0216061cheney1.html

And Here we have that it is IMPOSSIBLE for Whittington to have sustained that kind of damage at 30 yards: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x438089

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. He lied? Geez, I'm shocked.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obstruction of Justice Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not in this instance.
In fact, it doesn't translate to lying. Giving an estimate of the distance is not anything that police look at as an objective or scientific measure. It's an estimate.

30 feet would be about right for the pattern of the shot, and for it to have penetrated the clothing and done internal damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. My obstruction of justice question was for the delay in having Cheney
speaking to the sheriff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The sheriff
agreed to the meeting the following day. That error -- and it obviously is an error -- belongs to the sheriff. If the department had looked for Cheney, and he and others did things to hide him, it would be an offense. As it is, the sheriff's behavior is offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. This bothers me/ why didn't they just blame someone else inst. of Cheney?
Something just popped into my head earlier --

OK obviously there's something funny going on (cover up of some sort)

I believe they intended to sweep the whole thing under the rug and the public would never even get wind of this so why did she REALLY call that local paper?
I don't buy that Armstrong was told to go through the local media to report the *accident* by Cheney.

Further...If everyone in that hunting party was going along with the flow and there were no outsiders present who would squeal later wouldn't the obvious thing have been to say someone else shot Harry sparing Cheney all together?

I am not sure why this bothers me and comes to mind.

Could it be that Armstrong may have gotten cold feet and called the paper on her own fearing some type of blame for this incident?

Is my logic here flawed?

I know we have been told she was coached by M.Matalin but for someone that was coached she certainly made some stupid remarks that added even more grounds for speculation---such as the beer in the cooler etc.

Just some things I have been kicking around in my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. yes. Which is reason for arrest and trial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obstruction of Justice!
Obstruction of justice!
Just like they nailed Clinton about Monicagate. But worse, because someone got badly injured.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Actually, here in New Hampshire we have "Unsworn falsification"
Actually, here in New Hampshire we have an interesting
crime called "Unsworn falsification". I'm not sure of the
exact parameters of the crime, but I think if you knowingly
tell the cops lies in the interest of concealing a possible
crime, they're likely to charge you with this (as well as
whatever else they finally dig up).

I wonder if Texas has a similar crime?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. You don't expect a CLOSED investigation to be reopened over algebra?
It's closed they were being discreet before.

Now the reports will disappear into Secret Service custodu and become part of those secret presidential archives that will remain sealed for 200 years.

You know they COULD reveal how an Al Qaeda lawyer posing as a republican contributer could get within gunshot of a Vice-presidential hunting party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. But he wasn't under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. See my post above re: "Unsworn falsification" (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. In Washingtons State as in many other states...
you can be arrested for giving a false statement under oath or not under oath to any law enforcement or regulatory agency!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. The investigating officer should have assumed as much.



Once he saw all those goppers' lips move.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. And also this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cheney didn't necessarily lie, he's just unqualified to judge length...
heck, even with Viagra, he thinks his slong is twelve inches long. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Then he HAS NO BUSINESS HUNTING!
Otherwise, it's RECKLESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. What he was doing ain't called HUNTING in my world
Canned hunt? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Isn't that aka "Obstruction of Justice" nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Think he'll go to
jail, or even pay a political price? 'Cause I think they've got this story locked down, and it will disappear in a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. The story will never disappear.
The vice president shot a guy. Nothing will happen to Cheney, of course, but the story will go down in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. True, but
as a political issue it will soon die. I fail to see it gaining any traction. Although, if we can show he was drunk, it might then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. He's lied to tens of thousands of police officers, and firemen and
school teachers and doctors and all other types of citizens,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. i don't consider that lying
if he told the officer he wasn't drinking and then later admitted on fox news that he may have actually started in on the beer as early as lunch...that is a lie

however being able to estimate distance accurately and tell by eye exactly how many yards away something is -- that is a skill many claim to have but damn few if any actually do have -- i don't consider that a lie but a common misapprehension about perception shared by almost everyone

all birders know that size and distance deceives, i have to assume that most hunters have observed this basic truth as well

the human eye and ability to perceive distance is not as good as we think it is

i'm not interested in second-guessing someone else's second guess as to how far away he was standing when he accidentally shot someone

i'm interested in his blood alcohol level at the time of the shooting

focus, grasshopper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. He stays under the radar because he LIES, that's what he DOES K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe you can add the part of the transcript from his interview
with Hume where he said he was 30 feet away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. another test
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ugh, NPR has Alan Simpson on now, saying how Cheney
"gave up on" the media because they asked stupid questions. He's talking about how he never calls them (yeah, sure) and downgrading people who don't like Cheney because "he kills birds", before they had some guy on saying he couldn't believe people were making a big deal out of this shooting thing when Cheney is such a "well qualified" man bla bla. NPR has become so scary, but I can't get AAR reception in my house (only car)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh, the irony. After all of this
if Cheney goes down for lying to a cop about drinking..... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Hope the cop read Cheney his rights.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC