Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've started wearing my "eat the rich" pin again.......and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:05 PM
Original message
I've started wearing my "eat the rich" pin again.......and
some stupid people have to ask me what it means. I have a crossed knife and fork pin under the eat the rich one, and one woman says "I don't get it, what does it mean." I just shrugged and walked away. She's a lock step repub and I can't ever talk to her about this administration, and she's bit of an air head anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can we learn from Bush and torture them first before we eat them?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptolle Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Nope
First- I, and IMO we all ought to object to torture in all ways as a matter of principle and secondly that much stress puts all sorts of bad biochemicals in the bloodstream and might ruin the meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. What about softening the meat like we do with veal?
We can put their children in little boxes so the sun doesn't ruin the meat. That's not torture is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. while I agree with the frustration
I think it should be clear that it is not the richness that is the problem, but the evil. I personally know a wonderful 88 year old woman in that tax category who spends as much of her time and money giving back as she can, and it doesn't seem so great to broad brush her along with the vile rich types. I also know enough of the "poor" who deserve the same fate as the "rich", in terms of their support for evil.

All I'm saying is, we need to use the knives and forks on the bad guys, not necessarily all the "rich". This "hate the rich" trope comes up enough that I think we should be careful about its use. It smacks of the rise of violent leftist movements bad enough to be compared to the evil right wing movements we fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. When the rich give back their tax cuts
then I'll feel sympathy for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm asking for accuracy, not sympathy
Evil is evil; rich isn't necessarily synonymous. We can expect a higher standard of proof for evil than income.

You really want rich people to give back money to this government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. This is exactly why I wear this pin:
(This has been posted elsewhere on DU)

A Cancer Drug Shows Promise, at a Price That Many Can't Pay
By ALEX BERENSON
Published: February 15, 2006
Doctors are excited about the prospect of Avastin, a drug already widely used for colon cancer, as a crucial new treatment for breast and lung cancer, too. But doctors are cringing at the price the maker, Genentech, plans to charge for it: about $100,000 a year.

(snip)
Until now, drug makers have typically defended high prices by noting the cost of developing new medicines. But executives at Genentech and its majority owner, Roche, are now using a separate argument — citing the inherent value of life-sustaining therapies.If society wants the benefits, they say, it must be ready to spend more for treatments like Avastin and another of the company's cancer drugs, Herceptin, which sells for $40,000 a year.

"As we look at Avastin and Herceptin pricing, right now the health economics hold up, and therefore I don't see any reason to be touching them," said William M. Burns, the chief executive of Roche's pharmaceutical division and a member of Genentech's board. "The pressure on society to use strong and good products is there.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/15/business/15drug.html?_r=2&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=login&emc=th&adxnnlx=1140028175-YXDwM0rLfwiNkycPeVeHnA&oref=slogin


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=429661&mesg_id=429661





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't see the relevance of a disgusting pharma company
and the government that supports it to my 88 year old wealthy friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reminds me of this "Rushmore" quote:
"Now, for some of you, It doesn't matter. You were born rich, and you're going to stay rich. But here's my advice to the rest of you: Take dead aim on the rich boys. Get them in the crosshairs and take them down. Just remember: They can buy anything, but they can't buy backbone. Don't let them forget that. Thank you." -Herman Blume
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They can buy anything but backbone. Kind of sums up the last five years
quite succinctly. Thanks for posting that quote, great movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL! I want one of those! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. too much fat
they're off the Atkins menu . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe she isn't hungry enough yet? Or is she rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. my fave pin is my "war is terrorism" one--but "poverty is a weapon of mass
destruction" is a close, close second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC