Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm thinking some really fucking nasty thoughts about Schumer and Reid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:46 PM
Original message
I'm thinking some really fucking nasty thoughts about Schumer and Reid
Why I am is because what they did to Hackett so they could pump up some nobidy from Avon Lake which will allow Dewine to win easily in my state. If I was to post what I'm thinking it would surely get me banned from this forum and I do not want that to happen.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought Hackett was resisting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springsteen4senate Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. they are chickenshits, hackett was exactly what we needed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Hackett is one now too if he's doing this because of
what other people said. I thought he was a fighting democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Schumer's always been
a baldly opportunistic Senator - the joke was that the most dangerous place in DC was between Chuck Schumer and a camera.

But Reid's just a dingbat. I've always thought his selection as Minority Leader was idiotic, and now I KNOW it was idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hackett made the decision.
Why aren't you mad at him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm not mad at him because I know how politics works
they are supporting Brown, Hackett's fundraising sources dry up, the race becomes more and more difficult. Same situation, different players this year with the MN Senate race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So why didn't HE stand up and say no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Say no, to what? to who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. They're not telling him to drop out of politics; just run for Congress
instead. And if Hackett is dropping out because of what they say how would he do in the Senate? He can't even stand up for his own campaign. How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. There are three candidates running in the district that got
in the race after Hackett assured them he would not run in 2006. To run now would betray what he told them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Bullshit, they're telling him he's not good enough to be a Senator
And that turns away canidates more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. what they really mean is he's too progressive to be a senator . . .
and how stupid is it to discourage a candidate who's garnering interest and support from across the country? . . . isn't that the kind of candidate we should most want? . . .

no wonder Democrats can't win elections . . . they suck at politics . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Damn straight OneBlueSky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC