on Dec. 28th Ney claimed that he would be proven innocent

[salin]

and pushes the idea that because he was "fifteenth" on the list of congressional folks recieving money from abramoff as 'evidence' of his claim.

http://www.wtrf.com/story.cfm?func=viewstory&storyid=7638

read this little item - just a week or so ago... wonder what ole Bob is saying today.

[Skidmore]

1. Maybe someone should have told him earlier they weren't

ranking them, just listing them.

[salin]

2. no kidding. also like his 'believable' claim:

He also added that he won't dwell on the contribution contraversy, because he doesn't really know that much about it.

Ya, Bob. You haven't heard a word about the controversial timing of $ and your congressional comments read into the record for Sun Cruz - given the lack of coverage since the arrest and plea bargain of Kidan. Oh, you must only watch Faux - and they don't even mention republicans being implicated in scandals.

[EST]

3. Interesting, isn't it?

That our evaluation of a particular politician is supposed to hinge on whether or not he's been indicted, yet.

[ohio_liberal]

4. Hah!

That's my local news station. I wish the local newspaper kept stories online for more than a few days. Mr Ney has a nasty habit of responding to LTTE's, accusing the letter writers of being shills for MoveOn. It's a hoot.