Randi is quoting Capitol Hill Blue on Abramoff

[helderheid]

[jasmeel]

1. What's she say?

[helderheid]

3. she was quoting from this article

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_8013.shtml

[kstewart33]

2. I wouldn't.

[in_cog_ni_to]

4. Someone needs to give her a heads up about the site.

I would think Randi would know better, but maybe not.:shrug:

[helderheid]

5. I couldn't believe my ears

[dchill]

6. I've said it before, I'll say it again...

Capitol Hill Blue is at the very least more credible than any of the statements from this administration. What's not to like about the idea that a certain president might be on medication to control his rage - seems right to me! So what if it's not documentable? This kind of stuff is used by the Bushies against their "enemies" every single day. Now they're using the NSA. This can't hurt.

[TomInTib]

7. DU and CHB....

I think the real reason some people on DU have a negative opinion of CHB is that the founder was full throttle on Clinton the same as he is on Bush.
Doug has actually turned the site over to a group of people recently.
Folks here should just grow up, get past the Clinton stuff, and ralize CHB's batting average has been pretty good over the last year.

[dchill]

8. Oh.

Didn't know that. Thanks.

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

9. That's less the problem than the fact that the "talk generating" articles

that appear there (like shrubya saying the Constitution is "just a piece of paper", chimpy going crazy etc.) are generally of the sort that are hearsay from some anonymous source, therefore can't be backed up by any other source.

It's gossip of the type that many of us would believe to be consistent with the truth, but no more proveable than something like the Polier intern rumors about Kerry during primaries.