Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Caller calls Limbaugh Drug Addict on today's show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:39 PM
Original message
Caller calls Limbaugh Drug Addict on today's show
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 06:51 PM by thefloyd
I don't want to post a link to the transcript for obvious reasons. Did anyone else happen to hear
the caller from Pennsylvania? Caller starts discussing how Rush will react when Democrats take power and direct the NSA to spy on 'DRUG ADDICTS LIKE RUSH'. Wow. Very funny.


Edit: Portion of the call

RUSH: Wait a minute, now. If you want to stay stuck in the notion that you got cheated out of the election in 2000, and if you then want to jump forward from that and say Bush is spying on you, then I'm going to get out of the way and let you deliver the rest of your monolog because I want the whole country to hear where you Democrats are, so go ahead, Joe, and let me have it.

CALLER: Good, Rush. When people who are your enemies come to power, they can use the tools that Bush now has. Guys like you, drug addicts like you, better watch your butt.

RUSH: Hey, Joe? Don't stop there. Don't stop there, Joe. You're doing a fine job of portraying yourself. Your buddies have already tried stuff like that with me, Joe, when they're not even in power. Did he hang up?

CALLER: No, I didn't hang up.



http://tinyurl.com/7mgdd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. How did he get through?
That must have been a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow! How did Rush respond to this call?
I'm surprised a lib got through the massive, phone-screening system on Rush's show.

Rush doesn't handle unscripted jabs at himself very well. He's fine, if he's behind the confines and safety of his tightly controlled itinerary.

I wish I had heard this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I only read the transcript from Rush's site
but yes Rush let the caller continue to talk. I really cannot bring myself to posting a link to Limbaugh's site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Have you tried to get through before Sparkles?
Sounds like you have some firsthand experience. Tell us more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I have tried to get through before...but I was never shut out...
...I just got a busy signal for a couple of hours.

Rush used to say that he puts liberal callers at the front of the line. A year ago, he said this policy was now dead. He was angry at some liberal caller, and decided that he will no longer automatically put liberals at the front of the line.

I've heard a couple of Dems on lately. All of them were venting about their frustration with the Dem party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. How embarassing
Be sure not to kick this thread and accidentally remind people that Rush "Anal Cyst Absentee" Limbaugh is a drug addict and law VIOLATOR, who uses his influence for old-fashioned, low-grade demagogery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. wow, was he disconnected right away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Nope
Rush "let" him speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. you just made my day.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please post the link - your computer won't get cooties n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, see OTHER people are drug addicts, not people like Rush.
You're only a drug addict if you are poor or a person or color. See, rich white guys like Rush just have a little substance abuse problem and it's definitely NOT their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Exactly
Always someone elses fault because he or she 'did not work hard enough'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Good thing The ACLU is defending Limbaugh's right to medical privacy
ACLU Asks Court to Protect Confidentiality of Rush Limbaugh's Medical Records (1/12/2004)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PALM BEACH, FL - In a motion filed today, the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida said state law enforcement officers violated Rush Limbaugh's privacy rights by seizing the conservative radio talk show host's medical records as part of a criminal investigation involving alleged "doctor-shopping."

"While this case involves the right of Rush Limbaugh to maintain the privacy of his medical records, the precedent set in this case will impact the security of medical records and the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship of every person in Florida," said Howard Simon, Executive Director of the ACLU of Florida.

The ACLU's request to submit a "friend-of-the-court" brief on behalf of Limbaugh was filed today with the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The ACLU said in its motion that the state infringed on Florida's constitutional right to privacy when it failed to follow well-established protocol, mandated by law, when confiscating Limbaugh's medical files. The organization stated that its interest in the case was "to vindicate every Floridian's fundamental right to privacy by ensuring that the state be required to comply" with the law.

Because of heightened concerns about medical privacy, the Florida Legislature mandated a process - outlined in Sections 456.057(5)(a) and 395.3025(4)(d) of the Florida Statutes - that requires law enforcement officers to notify the person whose medical records they seek to obtain and give that person the opportunity to object before the subpoena is issued and before the records are seized.

"The legislature has enacted procedures that carefully balance the interests of law enforcement against the right of every citizen to maintain the privacy of their communications with their physician," said Ft. Lauderdale attorney Jon May, who is serving as counsel for the ACLU. "In this case the State Attorney has circumvented this carefully crafted scheme. If the state can do this to Rush Limbaugh, then the privacy rights of every citizen in Florida are in jeopardy."

In October, Limbaugh checked himself into a rehabilitation clinic after telling listeners on his radio program that he is addicted to painkillers. The ACLU has long recognized the need for a viable public health approach for drug control. Criminal prosecutions are the government's primary weapons to stamp out illicit drugs in the "War on Drugs." However, the ACLU has maintained that the so-called "War on Drugs" has led to a dramatic increase in the nation's prison population, while doing little to curb the drug trade. The organization believes there are better ways, other than criminal prosecution and incarceration, to address drug abuse that will ultimately lead to a healthier, freer and less crime-ridden society.

"Limbaugh's case demonstrates that the 'War on Drugs' is not working," said Anthony Romero, Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union. "This case provides a stark example of how the government chooses to prosecute non-violent drug offenses, rather than provide treatment for drug users."

The ACLU of Florida's Simon added: "For many people, it may seem odd that the ACLU has come to the defense of Rush Limbaugh. But we have always said that the ACLU's real client is the Bill of Rights and we will continue to safeguard the values of equality, fairness and privacy for everyone, regardless of race, economic status or political point of view."

"We have defended the rights of every group on the political spectrum from anti-war protesters and Oliver North to church-state separation activists and Jerry Falwell," Simon noted.

The case is Rush Limbaugh v. State of Florida, Case No. 4D03-4973. In addition to May, Randall Marshall, ACLU of Florida's Legal Director, is counsel of record.
To read the ACLU's motion to file an amicus on behalf of Limbaugh, visit: http://www.aclufl.org/limbaughmotiontofile.html

DU rules allow posting of press releases in entirety.

More:
http://www.aclu.org/privacy/medical/14969prs20040112.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. here's a link to the transcript--didn't hurt to get it :-)
and for those who want, take a read:

http://tinyurl.com/7mgdd

Now, am going to go read a book for a few minutes and refresh my brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC