When they ask, "would you want President Hillary to have wiretap power"

[Inland]

it doesn't faze the freepers. They don't plan for there ever to be an election that changes power to anyone but another right wing fascist wannabe, as part of the point of the fight against civil liberties and voting rights, and the electoral college, uncontrolled contibutions, swift boating, free speech areas, and the rest, is to make sure that doesn't happen.

All it does is reinforce their desire to take the task to completion, because one can't have half-fascist state. Sad, but true.

[boobooday]

1. Clear and compelling evidence

That they do not intend to ever peacefully hand over power, if we ever get a fair election process.

If they thought that they would have to hand power back to the Democrats at some point, they wouldn't be amassing such power in the executive branch.

On the other hand, they could be counting on the fact that those of us who care about democracy would never nominate nor elect someone who says, during the campaign, that "a dictatorship would be a heckuva lot easier."

[Hubert Flottz]

2. As long as you didn't have nothing to hide I guess it'd be elegant

Least That's what all the repubes say, about the Fuhrer! So I guess what's fair for the gander, is fair for the goose. So it would be cool for her to take a little gander, at the Freepers blind and not so blind trusts and the like! Hill could Pilfer the freepers digs to her hearts consent when they're out of town to the NASCAR races and so on. They'll just have to trust Mrs. Clinton, right?

Since we don't have anything to hide I guess it's okay to just go ahead and let it all hang out...right?