Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Senate Committee Hearing - Electronic Surveillance - Thread 11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:05 PM
Original message
Official Senate Committee Hearing - Electronic Surveillance - Thread 11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Senator Feingold up next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. yes he is :^)
Senator Feingold joked during the Alito hearings that his testimony always preceeds or follows a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yay! This should be good.
Do you know if Leahy gets another shot at Gonzales? I want Gonzales to produce that start dates of this program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you Viva_La_Revolution for putting these threads
together! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. You are doing a great job
A great big Thanks from me too:thumbsup::hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every question from a Dem should be prefaced with....
"I cannot believe the chairman will not put you under oath, Mr. Gonzales. Therefore, I have no faith in your answers to the questions I'm about to ask you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Excellent!
Or...at the very least, ask Gonzo if he will agree to be put under oath..before each question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Well put!
Like I'm suppose to believe what he's saying...:eyes:

At least if they lie under oath they *might* face punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Link for Powerline News......the guy who questioned Durbin. Is this it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Guy was SUCH a douchebg
Was that a veiled threat about Rather, or how he swift-boated him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Power Line and Rathergate -
http://www.vanityfair.com/commentary/content/printables/051114roco01?print=true

Mary Mapes, producer of story writes:

<snip>

Things began to change at about 11 a.m., when I started hearing rumbles from some producers at CBS News that a handful of far-right Web sites were saying the documents had been forged.

I was incredulous. That couldn't be possible. When we'd shown the president's people the memos, the White House hadn't attempted to deny the truth of the documents. In fact, the president's communications director, Dan Bartlett, had claimed that the documents supported their version of events: that then Lieutenant Bush had asked for permission to leave the unit.

Within a few minutes, I was visiting Web sites I had never heard of: Free Republic, Little Green Footballs, Power Line. They were hard-core, politically angry, hyperconservative sites loaded with vitriol about Dan Rather and CBS. People posted their questionable recollections that electric typewriters in the 1970s did not do "superscripts," the small "th" or "st" suffixes following a number and lifted higher than the other letters. This was important because, in the Killian memos, "111th" was sometimes typed with a superscript. Other bloggers claimed there was no proportional spacing on old typewriters—using different widths for different characters—even though some of the old official documents had proportional spacing. The claims snowballed.

I remember staring, disheartened and angry, at one posting. "60 Minutes is going down," the writer crowed.

<snip>

much more in story if you get a chance

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
107. That was Jeff Gannon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. here's an interesting little bit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. surprise, surprise! They have a Stop the ACLU ad on their site..
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:24 PM by in_cog_ni_to
that explains where that guy was coming from. No wonder he was so rude!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
114. If you watch the video of Durbin
you know that's Jeff Gannon. When Durbin asks him who he is with he says at first "Talon" and than very quickly corrects himself (or maybe to let us know he's back).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is Leahy angling to get the Buffalo video played?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Specter has already said he will NOT allow it to be played.
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:10 PM by in_cog_ni_to
rat bastard.

That's why they played it on the lunch break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Can't the Senators quote it in their questioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes and DiFi read the entire quote from the tape when she questioned
Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. DiFi brought it up, but Gonzalez said that The President was
referring to the Patriot Act when he answered that question. It was some nice tap dancing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. So was Gonzalez saying that warrantless wiretaps were ok b4 Patriot act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. He didn't answer ANY of her questions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. He wiggled around that question.
Leahy tried to pin him down on the dates that these activities started. LEahy asked if they happened after Sept 11th and before the signing of the Patriot Act. Gonzales said he didn't know the dates. Leahy demanded that he return with the dates after the lunch break. We shall see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It is time to bombard his office with
calls, letters, emails, and faxes and let him know how we feel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
124. but cspan played it earlier in a newsconference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
120. what is the buffalo video?
Sorry for being so clueless- I'm cube-bound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well this should tell you where powerline stands
Pat Leahy was completely over the top:

"My concern is for peaceful Quakers who are being spied upon, and other law-abiding Americans and babies and nuns who are placed on terrorist watch lists," Leahy said.
Seems like they are really in the RW kool aid drinking crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. oops
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:19 PM by dogday
sorry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Powerline was a part of the Gannon thing.
They are a huge part of the swiftboating of Senator Daschle in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pajamas Media - interesting article here
http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/20/but-seriously-folks/

I’ll start the ball rolling: I think you should be a conservative Huffington Post. Stop trying to act fair and balanced; have a worldview and be proud of it. Thank your liberal tokens who were kind enough to join in and give you beard and come out and be right and be proud.

To be Huffington, you’d need to convince some blogless conservative celebrities to contribute. That may ber tough, considering your PR now. But I’d try to call in a few debts.

Ask for suggestions not just in content but also in business: in advertising and, Lord knows, in PR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. What is pajamas media and how does it relate to
Senate Committee Hearing - Electronic Surveillance? I must've missed something...thanks in advance for any explanations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Pajamas Media asked questions of the dems in their hearings
break press conference. I am doing some research on who they are and what their mission is.

Example: Charles Johnson, Founder & Chief Technology Officer of PJ Media appears to be the guy that "broke" the story about the AWOL/CBS Rathergate bullshit. Check out this link -


http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:gbWSDgPH_roJ:www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/%3Fentry%3D12526_Bush_Guard_Documents-_Forged+Charles+Johnson&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
50. Oh, okay, I did miss that
Although, were they the ones questioning Kennedy during the lunch break? I caught part of that and the 'reporter' seemed pretty aggressive with the questions and, especially, in attitude. But, trying to keep track at work, so I'm missing a heck of a lot! Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Roger L. Simon, Founder & Chief Executive Officer PJ Media
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0800363/

Screenwriter and Novelist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Charles Johnson, Founder & Chief Technology Officer PJ Media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
58. Jill Stewart, Western US Editor PJ Media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. B*sh's 2007 budget plan is being released today...
interesting. Which story will be the one covered on faux?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Shrubs clean up man, we are protecting americans by spying on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. Back in 3 min... Is Snotty going to finish in time?
taking bets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. C-span cut off Les' weirdo question
in order to go back to the panel.

Spector says that they do not have enough time to finish today. They will return for another day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. They're baaaaaaaaaack! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. 2 days of Republican ass-kissing
whoopee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. Spector announcing a second round, Gonzo back tomorrow
till 5pm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. They will go until 5:00 ET and shedule a second hearing with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. Feingold !!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Go Russ!
Cut them no slack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
42. Someone posted that every Democrat should start their
questions with the swearing in issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Lindsey Graham having a bad hair day
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. Back to Gonzales credibility and respect for the rule of law!
Hot Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
69. Feingold is impeaching Gonzale's confirmation hearing testimony
Feingold is deep into a VERY serious charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
43. Feingold wished that the AG was sworn in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. Feingold - not happy Gonz isn't sworn in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. Feingold's up. He's praising the repukes on the other side? Huh?
Did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. No he is saying that this should be a bi-partisan issue...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. He named names from across the aisle who agree with this issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Admin has a pre-1776 mentality. LOL! Go Russ. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
49. Why do we need FISA? PLEASE, Russ, ask that question! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
51. Beautiful!
Duhboy has a pre-1776 view of the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
53. This is about possible WRONGDOING!
RUSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
giant_robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. YES!
It's so nice to see a democrat with balls take these bastards on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
55. Feingold: The Admin violated the law and is coming up
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:50 PM by myrna minx
with excuses to explain their actions. They mislead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
57. Feingold: "This hearing is not only about (making changes
in the future); this hearing is also about possible wrongdoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
59. I don't understand: who does AG work for?
Why is he an apologist for WH policies? Does he represent WH? Is he supposed to be independent? Is he catapulting the propaganda or offering the public an independent legal opinion? Does AG work under executive branch or judicial branch?

I understand when WH counsel comes out with defense of WH policies, trying to do the work of the WH. But Gonzales is no longer in that job and I don't understand why he is still acting that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Gonzales is a CRONY , Bushie YES-man :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. He has his roles confused--thinks he is still council to Jr--instead of
working for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #65
79. Fiengold is going after that scumball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #79
84. and tells gondo that the Pres has been very misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. Bottom line, he is a Bush appointee. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
60. Please nail him, Russ. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
61. Did you or anyone else ask the chairman to not have you sworn in?
Gonzales and Spector: No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
62. Ruh, Roh...did you ask to not be under oath? Did anyone ask Specter
to not swear you in? "not that I know of."

Russ must have caught him in a LIE. Here we go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
63. Russ is nailing him down about his previous testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
66. Gonzales is getting testy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Yes, and this is the wrong guy sent out with the wrong message.
I hope Russ hangs him out to dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
68. Go Russ!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
71. rat bastard's going to lose his temper soon.
:7 Can't WAIT. Russ is calling him a liar(in a round about way). Told him he deliberately misled the committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. gonzo raising voice! hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Oh I hope so.....Russ is calling him a LIAR !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #71
83. I can hear him seethe.
I'm waiting for him to say "Why do you hate America?"

I hope he says something STUPID and it all blows up.

I want a Tom Cruise/Jack Nicholson moment here, damn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
72. Let the semantics begin.
Does the president have the authority? Mr AG, you were misleading this committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. You wanted to be confirmed so you didn't tell us the truth.
K/O!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
73. Russ is basically calling Alberto a liar...I love it...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
74. holy crap, Feingold is going for the throat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #74
85. Go russ!!!!
:bounce: :bounce:

push him hard....

make him lose his temeper on TV

push him over the edge!!!! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #74
87. Ain't it great :))))))))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #74
91. When he said Mr. Chairman I thought he was going to move a motion
to condemn Gonzales for his confirmation hearing testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
78. Feingold to Gonzales: "You are taking mincing words to a new high" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
80. Nothing we do is against the law
Because we ARE the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
81. yehaw!
Feingold is ripping him up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #81
90. Bringing up the 1967 Katz case saying that
phone calls are protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #90
112. I don't remember the Katz case...
guess i'll have to do a google on that one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jane_pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
82. Go Russ!! Call this guy out!
:woohoo:

What did he say, Alberto is "taking mincing words to a new level?"

Go RUSS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
86. Russ eviscerating Gonzo. "You misled this committee;" "You didn't want
to jeopardize your confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
88. Russ told him he knew the question wasn't a hypothetical and he keeps
saying he was answering hypothetical questions when he LIED. Good grief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #88
92. kiss up time from Graham, what a fucking waste of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. UGH...every one of them (repukes) is covering up this crime! SICK
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM by in_cog_ni_to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #88
97. This is the best I have ever seen Feingold - he's well prepared.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
89. Sweet, calling the Roosevelt example irrelevant
which it definitely is. No FISA at that time, buddy boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #89
94. Oh no! His time went by so fast :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. but MY Senator used it well:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
93. Miss Lindsey up now-has an Alfalfa hair-do today n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #93
100. It's deliberate
it's the "aw-shucks-I'm-just-the-boy-nextdoor" look.... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #100
117. He forgot to comb over his bald spot n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #93
105. Miss Lindsey
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
95. Damn-I need a cigarette after that satisfying series of questions. Whoa. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
99. give me 5 mins alone with lyndsey
5 mins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. give ME 30 seconds
I would slap him silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. slap ? hehehe
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 02:00 PM by Twist_U_Up
slap ? hehehee im not usually a violent person but I can make exceptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #104
113. why? what were YOU going to do?
Twist him up, perhaps? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #102
121. He would "Clean your Clock," remember??
Tough guy Graham threathened the Dems last week.

God, I can't stand him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #99
122. He is having a BAD HAIR DAY
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
101. Oh, Robbed of Russ, here comes Rindsey...
I'm so Ronery for Russ.... :pffft:

Please be aware of how Graham's sliminess translates into "No, all of these Rwing Senators who feign concerned are, in fact, bought out already."

The question is not whether or not GONZALEZ believes he broke the law. The question is whether or not he DID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
103. Graham , ask a f'inq question already! Not a rhetorical one either!
It's the snarkiness that drives me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #103
118. Yes lets not NEUTER the Congress or Courts under President Hillary Clinton
ROTFL ... President Hillary is a freeper's worst nightmare. I don't agree with a lot Hillary does but she got big cajones and I'd love to see the Right Wing spontaneously combust with seething resentments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jane_pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
106. Who's this little weasel now? You can introduce a legislation if you think
a law was broken?

NOT WHEN YOU HAVE TO HAVE 'FORUMS' IN THE BASEMENT BECAUSE YOU'RE THE MINORITY! So take your little jabs about the courage of your convictions somewhere else, Droopy Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
108. Actually Graham is doing OK
He IS a sleaze, but he's at least giving lip service to concerns in a very finessed way. I don't doubt he'll sleaze out in the end, but still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
109. Lindsey seems a bit skeptical even if he is partisan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #109
119. its an act,its all an act
I'm surprised gonzos wife isnt balling her eyes out on camera yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
110. THREAD 12
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 02:02 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #110
123. this is one reason why this is important--posted in LBN
Mon Feb-06-06 11:33 AM
Original message
Telecoms let NSA spy on calls (AT&T, MCI and Sprint)


The National Security Agency has secured the cooperation of large telecommunications companies, including AT&T, MCI and Sprint, in its efforts to eavesdrop without warrants on international calls by suspected terrorists, according to seven telecommunications executives.

The executives asked to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the program. AT&T, MCI and Sprint had no official comment.

The Senate Judiciary Committee begins hearings today on the government's program of monitoring international calls and e-mails of a domestic target without first obtaining court orders. At issue: whether the surveillance is legal, as President Bush insists, or an illegal intrusion into the lives of Americans, as lawsuits by civil libertarians contend. (Related: Committee chief says program violates law)

In domestic investigations, phone companies routinely require court orders before cooperating.

SNIP

The New York Times, which disclosed the clandestine operation in December, previously reported that telecommunications companies have been cooperating with the government, but it did not name the companies involved. (Related: Bush says NSA program is legal)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-02-05-nsa-...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
111. Schumer is next...
New York in da house...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
115. The President's liar just said we do not engage in torture.
I hope he has a good confessor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
116. There you have it....
not one Republican senator willing to stand up to the Bush administration. Why bother with these sham hearings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #116
125. but Lindsey Grahmn asked good questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
126. Hey Sam Brokeback!
If there are people talking to "Al Qaeda" members why are they still allowed to carry on with their lives.


Personally I think "Al Qaeda" and "Osama" are made up to keep the masses in fear of the unknown and trustful of their goverment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC