Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those who think there is some desire by Congress to impeach, read this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:32 AM
Original message
For those who think there is some desire by Congress to impeach, read this:
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 04:49 AM by Dover
It is a discussion with four members, both Republican AND Democrats, of the Armed Services Committee.
Granted, CSIS that hosted this event is the think tank and bastion of people like Kissinger, Brzezinski, and many others of their ilk. But they likely represent the majority of both party reps that now sit in our Congress.

This talk basically regurgitates the same old stuff, but skip to the last full page (p.25) and read the question and answer. In their discussions there was no question by either the Republican or Democratic 'representatives' about our role and purpose for being in Iraq. Or even an issue with the lies that the public was told to get us there. Both party reps seemed to agree on this invasion of Iraq, and only differed in its operational fulfillment. The last questioner from the audience identified himself as being a member of LYM. I looked that up and think it stands for LaRouche Youth Movement. Nonetheless, the answer he got about impeachment is probably very much the majority thinking. Just a little dose of Washington reality for those hoping this Democratic Congress would be withdrawing from Iraq or impeaching the current regime.

http://www.csis.org/images/stories/congress/070108_iraq_forward.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think this was the committee that was 'more gentle' on Condi also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Funny, that's precisely the sense I get from most of Congress
"In their discussions there was no question by either the Republican or Democratic representatives about our role and purpose for being in Iraq. Or even an issue with the lies that the public was told to get us there. Both party reps seemed to agree on this invasion of Iraq, and only differed in its operational fulfillment."

Too many of them still don't seem to know, or have the courage to say, that Bush** lied us into Iraq. Ignoring that fact makes it all the more difficult to deal with him and his plans now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What do you mean? They point blank tried to tell the American people
that the reason they signed on for this war and empowered Bush was because they believed his lies.
Do you believe THEM? Or perhaps they were fully aware of and onboard with this invasion from the get-go. I seriously doubt there will be any impeachment, or withdrawal, or striking of the damaging legislative changes and policies, such as the Patriot Act. Sorry to say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. If they did believe his lies
...then they weren't doing their jobs. Because there were a handful in Congress who managed to deduce that Bush** was lying and refused to vote for his war. I don't pretend to know why so many of them went along. But too many of that lot are still hesitant to come right out and accuse Bush** of lying. Naturally in that case I don't expect they'd go whole hog and impeach him or change his damnable policies. And that's all I was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. You're forgetting that Waxman and Conyers are going to start
investigating. With some proof of crazy crap going down the public will get more agitated and this will push congress to impeach. It won't happen overnight. But, it's only my prediction. I'm usually a pessimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hope springs eternal...
But as long as people continue to wait.....and hope....and wait some more....meanwhile sh*t happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't care what Congress desires. I want this criminal impeached.
I don't pay Nancy to desire, I pay her to represent me.

And Congress has a choice. They can deal with a pissed off American public now or they can deal with us in 08.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, while they hand pick their own people to run.
Sorry the game is rigged. But by all means continue to play....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Dover, I have only two words for you.

Kobayashi Maru

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Aye, Captain.
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 05:58 AM by Dover
Perhaps the way to win is not to play in their game in the first place or to change the game completely?:patriot:

'They' are just players, afterall, in a much bigger 'game'...eh?

But tis true...it's not the win but how you play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Something that caught my attention:

Let me just say one little thing by way of introduction. One of the first things I
did when I came to CSIS – this was about six years ago – was we held a war game that
was called Dark Winter, and it simulated a smallpox attack on America, and it was very
realistic and very frightening. And I remember sitting in the middle of this National
Security Council meeting and it was truly scary
, and I came to realize the only two
people at that table that I trusted were politicians. (Laughter.) Now, I say that very
intentionally. I mean it. It was true. I mean, we had people that had been former
Cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries, but the only two people in that room were the
guy that was a sitting governor who was playing the role of a governor, and a former
senator was playing the role of the president – two politicians. And I came to realize
what a very, very powerful expertise it is that they have. It isn’t that these guys are
smarter than these experts that they bring around them in the National Security Council,
but they do something nobody else does. They go back and they talk to average citizens,
and they have to make sense to average citizens. And what a powerful thing that is.


So, the NSC held a war game called Dark Winter that they let certain priveleged think tanks attend. There's something very wrong about this.
Was there any Think Tanks involved with Dick's war games on September 11, 2001?
If so I wonder who would benefit by being ask for their input, or for whatever other reason they would be there!

Thanks for posting, I will try to finish reading when I get more time.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Good catch and good question...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. If They Desire To Be Re-elected
They better start regarding investigation and impeachment as a career move. I am sick to death of Congress voting poorly and using their electability as an excuse. Well, this time the people have spoken and there is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think Marshall's final answer on p. 25 sums it all up nicely.
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 07:42 AM by Dover
Just give those young Iraqi boys some guns and pickups (that's Silverado Pickups, BTW), then they'll get the job done on their own. Then they'll be REAL cowboys just like us. And isn't that what everyone wants to be? Yeeeehaw! I'm so excited I've got a war-on!


It it weren't so serious, sad and pathetic it would be downright funny...an SNL skit.

Well I guess they'll unload all those gas guzzlers by selling them to US via the military.
Makes sense. Plenty of cheap oil/gas in Iraq afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC